一项评估吸入皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂联合治疗COPD患者健康相关生活质量的研究

A. Kaur, V. Sehgal, Jasbir Singh, S. Singh, Meenakshi Raju
{"title":"一项评估吸入皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂联合治疗COPD患者健康相关生活质量的研究","authors":"A. Kaur, V. Sehgal, Jasbir Singh, S. Singh, Meenakshi Raju","doi":"10.18311/IJMDS/2021/26829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Do combined inhalers offer additional benefits or harms in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease compared with the bronchodilator alone? The present study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting beta agonist combination and to assess the health related quality of life among COPD patients.  Methods: A prospective, comparative study was conducted in department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala. A total of 80 patients were enrolled, and randomly allocated in two groups with 40 patients in each group. In group 1- Budesonide/formoterol (200/6 µg or 400/6 µg), and in group 2- Fluticasone/salmeterol (250/50 µg) was prescribed. The effectiveness was evaluated by assessing exacerbation rate, and breathlessness Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade. Health related quality of life was assessed using St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). All the observations thus made were statistically analyzed using chi-square test and t-test.  Results: In present study, male patients (n=63) were more than female patients (n=17). In group 1 significant improvement was observed in breathlessness mMRC grade between visit 0 and 2 nd (x2 = 8.50, p=0.004), and between visit 1 st and 2 nd (x2 = 7.24, p=0.007). Similarly, among group 2, significant improvement was seen in mMRC grade between visit 0 and 2 nd (x2 = 8.39, p=0.004), and between visit 1 st and 2 nd  (x2 = 5.05, p=0.025). But, no significant difference was seen between group 1 and 2 mMRC grade (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 exacerbation episodess (x2 = 2.13,p>0.05). In SGRQ mean total score, no significant difference was present between group 1 and 2 (p>0.05).  Conclusions: Budesonide Formoterol (BFC) and Fluticasone Salmeterol (FSC) belongs to same group of drug class i.e. inhaled corticosteroid with long acting beta agonist combination and are used to treat exacerbations in moderate to severe COPD patients. BFC and FSC are equally effective in present study.","PeriodicalId":14010,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","volume":"65 1","pages":"1968-1980"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Beta Agonist Combination and Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life Among COPD Patients on this Therapy\",\"authors\":\"A. Kaur, V. Sehgal, Jasbir Singh, S. Singh, Meenakshi Raju\",\"doi\":\"10.18311/IJMDS/2021/26829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Do combined inhalers offer additional benefits or harms in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease compared with the bronchodilator alone? The present study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting beta agonist combination and to assess the health related quality of life among COPD patients.  Methods: A prospective, comparative study was conducted in department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala. A total of 80 patients were enrolled, and randomly allocated in two groups with 40 patients in each group. In group 1- Budesonide/formoterol (200/6 µg or 400/6 µg), and in group 2- Fluticasone/salmeterol (250/50 µg) was prescribed. The effectiveness was evaluated by assessing exacerbation rate, and breathlessness Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade. Health related quality of life was assessed using St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). All the observations thus made were statistically analyzed using chi-square test and t-test.  Results: In present study, male patients (n=63) were more than female patients (n=17). In group 1 significant improvement was observed in breathlessness mMRC grade between visit 0 and 2 nd (x2 = 8.50, p=0.004), and between visit 1 st and 2 nd (x2 = 7.24, p=0.007). Similarly, among group 2, significant improvement was seen in mMRC grade between visit 0 and 2 nd (x2 = 8.39, p=0.004), and between visit 1 st and 2 nd  (x2 = 5.05, p=0.025). But, no significant difference was seen between group 1 and 2 mMRC grade (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 exacerbation episodess (x2 = 2.13,p>0.05). In SGRQ mean total score, no significant difference was present between group 1 and 2 (p>0.05).  Conclusions: Budesonide Formoterol (BFC) and Fluticasone Salmeterol (FSC) belongs to same group of drug class i.e. inhaled corticosteroid with long acting beta agonist combination and are used to treat exacerbations in moderate to severe COPD patients. BFC and FSC are equally effective in present study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"1968-1980\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18311/IJMDS/2021/26829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18311/IJMDS/2021/26829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与单独使用支气管扩张剂相比,联合吸入器对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者是否有额外的益处或危害?本研究旨在评估吸入皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂联合治疗的有效性,并评估COPD患者的健康相关生活质量。方法:对帕提亚拉市政府医学院肺内科与拉金德拉医院进行前瞻性比较研究。共纳入80例患者,随机分为两组,每组40例。1组布地奈德/福莫特罗(200/6µg或400/6µg), 2组氟替卡松/沙美特罗(250/50µg)。通过评估加重率和呼吸困难程度(mMRC)评分来评估疗效。采用圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评估健康相关生活质量。所有观察结果采用卡方检验和t检验进行统计学分析。结果:本组患者中,男性63例,女性17例。第1组患者呼吸困难mMRC评分在第0 ~ 2次就诊期间(x2 = 8.50, p=0.004)和第1 ~ 2次就诊期间(x2 = 7.24, p=0.007)均有显著改善。同样,在第2组中,mMRC分级在第0至第2次就诊期间(x2 = 8.39, p=0.004)和第1至第2次就诊期间(x2 = 5.05, p=0.025)均有显著改善。mMRC分级1组与2组间差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。1组与2组急性加重发作次数比较,差异无统计学意义(x2 = 2.13,p>0.05)。SGRQ平均总分1组与2组比较差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。结论:布地奈德福莫特罗(BFC)与氟替卡松沙美特罗(FSC)同属吸入性皮质类固醇与长效受体激动剂联用一类药物,可用于治疗中重度COPD患者的加重期。BFC和FSC在本研究中同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Beta Agonist Combination and Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life Among COPD Patients on this Therapy
Background: Do combined inhalers offer additional benefits or harms in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease compared with the bronchodilator alone? The present study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting beta agonist combination and to assess the health related quality of life among COPD patients.  Methods: A prospective, comparative study was conducted in department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala. A total of 80 patients were enrolled, and randomly allocated in two groups with 40 patients in each group. In group 1- Budesonide/formoterol (200/6 µg or 400/6 µg), and in group 2- Fluticasone/salmeterol (250/50 µg) was prescribed. The effectiveness was evaluated by assessing exacerbation rate, and breathlessness Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade. Health related quality of life was assessed using St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). All the observations thus made were statistically analyzed using chi-square test and t-test.  Results: In present study, male patients (n=63) were more than female patients (n=17). In group 1 significant improvement was observed in breathlessness mMRC grade between visit 0 and 2 nd (x2 = 8.50, p=0.004), and between visit 1 st and 2 nd (x2 = 7.24, p=0.007). Similarly, among group 2, significant improvement was seen in mMRC grade between visit 0 and 2 nd (x2 = 8.39, p=0.004), and between visit 1 st and 2 nd  (x2 = 5.05, p=0.025). But, no significant difference was seen between group 1 and 2 mMRC grade (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 exacerbation episodess (x2 = 2.13,p>0.05). In SGRQ mean total score, no significant difference was present between group 1 and 2 (p>0.05).  Conclusions: Budesonide Formoterol (BFC) and Fluticasone Salmeterol (FSC) belongs to same group of drug class i.e. inhaled corticosteroid with long acting beta agonist combination and are used to treat exacerbations in moderate to severe COPD patients. BFC and FSC are equally effective in present study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Topical Application of Citrus limon Peel Essential Oil Increased Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines Expression on Type IV Hypersensitivity Reaction Role of Intraoral Scanners in Pediatric Dentistry The Wider Meaning of Addiction Antibacterial Power of Nano Brown Anchovy (Stolephorus insularis) Against Mixed Bacteria in Deep Dentin Caries Scientific Integrity-Overcoming Challenges in Medical Research and Publication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1