经颅直流电刺激对外伤性脑损伤和脑血管意外后意识改变患者运动恢复的影响:一项随机临床试验

IF 0.2 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Indian Journal of Neurotrauma Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1761937
Raj Kumar, Suraj Kumar, H. Prajapati, G. Potturi, Rahul Sharma
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激对外伤性脑损伤和脑血管意外后意识改变患者运动恢复的影响:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Raj Kumar, Suraj Kumar, H. Prajapati, G. Potturi, Rahul Sharma","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1761937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and Purpose  Altered levels of consciousness resulting from a vascular insult to the brain can vary from confusion to coma. A disruption in the function of the brain stem reticular activating system in the brain stem or both cerebral hemispheres and thalami causes coma. This study is aimed at finding the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor recovery in altered conscious patients after traumatic brain injury and cerebrovascular accident. Materials and Methods  A total of 100 patients admitted to the neurology and neurosurgery unit of the university hospital were screened and 40 subjects who satisfied inclusion criteria were recruited and randomly divided into two groups, group A (experimental) ( n  = 20) and group B (control)(n = 20), by computerized randomization. Written informed consent was taken from all the caregivers before recruitment. After taking the preliminary assessment, anodal tDCS is given to the motor area (C3/C4 ipsilesional), sensory area (P3/P4 ipsilesional), and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3) according to the 10/20 electroencephalogram montage for two sessions of 20 min/day for 7 consecutive days. Routine physiotherapy was also given the same as group B. Results  At baseline, there were no significant group differences in the baseline characteristics. The groups passed the normality test. The results were tested for statistical significance between the groups by Mann–Whitney U test and by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey Honest Significant Difference for post-hoc comparison; the results were statistically different with p -value less than 0.05 with a large effect size. Conclusion  We conclude, based on the results of this study, that tDCS can be effective in motor recovery in altered consciousness patients. It is noninvasive, cost-effective with minimal contraindications, and does not interfere with other modalities in the intensive care unit. Hence, it can be administered safely under the supervision of a qualified therapist.","PeriodicalId":43198,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Recovery in Altered Conscious Patients after Traumatic Brain Injury and Cerebrovascular Accident: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Raj Kumar, Suraj Kumar, H. Prajapati, G. Potturi, Rahul Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1761937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background and Purpose  Altered levels of consciousness resulting from a vascular insult to the brain can vary from confusion to coma. A disruption in the function of the brain stem reticular activating system in the brain stem or both cerebral hemispheres and thalami causes coma. This study is aimed at finding the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor recovery in altered conscious patients after traumatic brain injury and cerebrovascular accident. Materials and Methods  A total of 100 patients admitted to the neurology and neurosurgery unit of the university hospital were screened and 40 subjects who satisfied inclusion criteria were recruited and randomly divided into two groups, group A (experimental) ( n  = 20) and group B (control)(n = 20), by computerized randomization. Written informed consent was taken from all the caregivers before recruitment. After taking the preliminary assessment, anodal tDCS is given to the motor area (C3/C4 ipsilesional), sensory area (P3/P4 ipsilesional), and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3) according to the 10/20 electroencephalogram montage for two sessions of 20 min/day for 7 consecutive days. Routine physiotherapy was also given the same as group B. Results  At baseline, there were no significant group differences in the baseline characteristics. The groups passed the normality test. The results were tested for statistical significance between the groups by Mann–Whitney U test and by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey Honest Significant Difference for post-hoc comparison; the results were statistically different with p -value less than 0.05 with a large effect size. Conclusion  We conclude, based on the results of this study, that tDCS can be effective in motor recovery in altered consciousness patients. It is noninvasive, cost-effective with minimal contraindications, and does not interfere with other modalities in the intensive care unit. Hence, it can be administered safely under the supervision of a qualified therapist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的脑血管损伤引起的意识水平改变可从意识模糊到昏迷。脑干网状激活系统在脑干或大脑半球和丘脑的功能中断导致昏迷。本研究旨在探讨经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对外伤性脑损伤和脑血管意外后意识改变患者运动恢复的影响。材料与方法筛选大学附属医院神经内科神经外科收治的患者100例,选取符合纳入标准的患者40例,采用计算机随机化方法随机分为A组(试验组)20例和B组(对照组)20例。招募前获得所有护理人员的书面知情同意。经初步评估后,按10/20脑电图蒙太奇对运动区(C3/C4同侧)、感觉区(P3/P4同侧)、左背外侧前额叶皮质(F3)进行阳极tDCS,每次20分钟/天,连续7天。常规物理治疗与b组相同。结果基线时,各组基线特征无显著差异。各组均通过正态性检验。采用Mann-Whitney U检验,事后比较采用单因素方差分析和Tukey Honest显著性差异检验;结果有统计学差异,p值< 0.05,效应量较大。结论基于本研究的结果,我们认为tDCS对意识改变患者的运动恢复是有效的。它是非侵入性的,成本效益低,禁忌症最小,并且不会干扰重症监护病房的其他模式。因此,它可以在合格治疗师的监督下安全地进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Recovery in Altered Conscious Patients after Traumatic Brain Injury and Cerebrovascular Accident: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract Background and Purpose  Altered levels of consciousness resulting from a vascular insult to the brain can vary from confusion to coma. A disruption in the function of the brain stem reticular activating system in the brain stem or both cerebral hemispheres and thalami causes coma. This study is aimed at finding the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor recovery in altered conscious patients after traumatic brain injury and cerebrovascular accident. Materials and Methods  A total of 100 patients admitted to the neurology and neurosurgery unit of the university hospital were screened and 40 subjects who satisfied inclusion criteria were recruited and randomly divided into two groups, group A (experimental) ( n  = 20) and group B (control)(n = 20), by computerized randomization. Written informed consent was taken from all the caregivers before recruitment. After taking the preliminary assessment, anodal tDCS is given to the motor area (C3/C4 ipsilesional), sensory area (P3/P4 ipsilesional), and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3) according to the 10/20 electroencephalogram montage for two sessions of 20 min/day for 7 consecutive days. Routine physiotherapy was also given the same as group B. Results  At baseline, there were no significant group differences in the baseline characteristics. The groups passed the normality test. The results were tested for statistical significance between the groups by Mann–Whitney U test and by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey Honest Significant Difference for post-hoc comparison; the results were statistically different with p -value less than 0.05 with a large effect size. Conclusion  We conclude, based on the results of this study, that tDCS can be effective in motor recovery in altered consciousness patients. It is noninvasive, cost-effective with minimal contraindications, and does not interfere with other modalities in the intensive care unit. Hence, it can be administered safely under the supervision of a qualified therapist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Neurotrauma and Cerebrospinal Fluid in Homer's Poems Impact of Single Blast Exposure on Neuronal Damage and Protein Levels in the Rat Brain at Varying Pressures An Unusual Case of Teeth in Neck: An Interesting Case Report Cognitive Outcomes following Virtual Reality Rehabilitation in Patient with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Techniques and Surgical Nuances of Management of Comminuted Fronto-Orbital Depressed Fractures: A Single-Surgeon Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1