n -乙酰半胱氨酸辅助治疗女性慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的疗效观察

IF 0.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Current Women s Health Reviews Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.2174/1573404819666221230145013
M. Mehrpooya, M. Mohseni, S. Rahimi, Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili, Y. Mohammadi
{"title":"n -乙酰半胱氨酸辅助治疗女性慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的疗效观察","authors":"M. Mehrpooya, M. Mohseni, S. Rahimi, Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili, Y. Mohammadi","doi":"10.2174/1573404819666221230145013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nConsidering supportive evidence on N-acetylcysteine (NAC) effectiveness in neuropathic pain syndromes, we conducted this study to evaluate its effect on women suffering from chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS).\n\n\n\nIn a randomized, double-blind study, 106 women with CPPS were assigned to receive NAC+amitriptyline or placebo+amitriptyline treatment. Amitriptyline was administrated at a dose of 25 mg/daily and NAC and placebo at 600 mg twice daily. The effect of treatment was assessed on the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and its domain scores, including pain, urinary symptoms, and quality of life impact scores at weeks 4 and 8 after treatment. The global response was also assessed on the 7-point patient-reported Global Response Assessment (GRA) scale at the end of the study.\n\n\n\nBy week 4, comparative improvements were noticed in the two groups' NIH-CPSI total score and domain scores. From week 4 to week 8, we noted the superior efficacy of NAC+amitriptyline treatment over placebo+amitriptyline in improving the NIH-CPSI total score and its domain scores, as the proportion of patients responding to treatment (the subjects with ≥ 6-point reduction in the total NIH-CPSI score), as well those reporting marked or moderate improvements in their overall symptoms on GRA was significantly more significant in patients receiving NAC+amitriptyline treatment relative to those receiving placebo+amitriptyline treatment.\n\n\n\nThese findings provided preliminary evidence regarding the possible role of NAC as an adjunct therapy in the management of CPPS in women, which needs to be validated in future studies.\n","PeriodicalId":11030,"journal":{"name":"Current Women s Health Reviews","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of N-Acetylcysteine as Add-on Therapy for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome in Women\",\"authors\":\"M. Mehrpooya, M. Mohseni, S. Rahimi, Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili, Y. Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1573404819666221230145013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nConsidering supportive evidence on N-acetylcysteine (NAC) effectiveness in neuropathic pain syndromes, we conducted this study to evaluate its effect on women suffering from chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS).\\n\\n\\n\\nIn a randomized, double-blind study, 106 women with CPPS were assigned to receive NAC+amitriptyline or placebo+amitriptyline treatment. Amitriptyline was administrated at a dose of 25 mg/daily and NAC and placebo at 600 mg twice daily. The effect of treatment was assessed on the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and its domain scores, including pain, urinary symptoms, and quality of life impact scores at weeks 4 and 8 after treatment. The global response was also assessed on the 7-point patient-reported Global Response Assessment (GRA) scale at the end of the study.\\n\\n\\n\\nBy week 4, comparative improvements were noticed in the two groups' NIH-CPSI total score and domain scores. From week 4 to week 8, we noted the superior efficacy of NAC+amitriptyline treatment over placebo+amitriptyline in improving the NIH-CPSI total score and its domain scores, as the proportion of patients responding to treatment (the subjects with ≥ 6-point reduction in the total NIH-CPSI score), as well those reporting marked or moderate improvements in their overall symptoms on GRA was significantly more significant in patients receiving NAC+amitriptyline treatment relative to those receiving placebo+amitriptyline treatment.\\n\\n\\n\\nThese findings provided preliminary evidence regarding the possible role of NAC as an adjunct therapy in the management of CPPS in women, which needs to be validated in future studies.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Women s Health Reviews\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Women s Health Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404819666221230145013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Women s Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404819666221230145013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到n -乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)在神经性疼痛综合征中的有效性,我们进行了这项研究,以评估其对慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CPPS)女性患者的影响。在一项随机双盲研究中,106名患有CPPS的女性被分配接受NAC+阿米替林或安慰剂+阿米替林治疗。阿米替林的剂量为25毫克/天,NAC和安慰剂的剂量为600毫克,每天两次。在治疗后第4周和第8周,通过美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)及其领域评分(包括疼痛、泌尿系统症状和生活质量影响评分)评估治疗效果。在研究结束时,还对患者报告的7分全球反应评估(GRA)量表进行了全球反应评估。到第4周,两组的NIH-CPSI总分和领域得分均有比较改善。从第4周到第8周,我们注意到NAC+阿米替林治疗在改善NIH-CPSI总分及其域评分方面优于安慰剂+阿米替林治疗,因为对治疗有反应的患者比例(NIH-CPSI总分降低≥6分的受试者),同时,与接受安慰剂+阿米替林治疗的患者相比,接受NAC+阿米替林治疗的患者总体症状有显著或中度改善。这些发现为NAC作为一种辅助治疗在女性CPPS管理中的可能作用提供了初步证据,这需要在未来的研究中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of N-Acetylcysteine as Add-on Therapy for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome in Women
Considering supportive evidence on N-acetylcysteine (NAC) effectiveness in neuropathic pain syndromes, we conducted this study to evaluate its effect on women suffering from chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS). In a randomized, double-blind study, 106 women with CPPS were assigned to receive NAC+amitriptyline or placebo+amitriptyline treatment. Amitriptyline was administrated at a dose of 25 mg/daily and NAC and placebo at 600 mg twice daily. The effect of treatment was assessed on the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and its domain scores, including pain, urinary symptoms, and quality of life impact scores at weeks 4 and 8 after treatment. The global response was also assessed on the 7-point patient-reported Global Response Assessment (GRA) scale at the end of the study. By week 4, comparative improvements were noticed in the two groups' NIH-CPSI total score and domain scores. From week 4 to week 8, we noted the superior efficacy of NAC+amitriptyline treatment over placebo+amitriptyline in improving the NIH-CPSI total score and its domain scores, as the proportion of patients responding to treatment (the subjects with ≥ 6-point reduction in the total NIH-CPSI score), as well those reporting marked or moderate improvements in their overall symptoms on GRA was significantly more significant in patients receiving NAC+amitriptyline treatment relative to those receiving placebo+amitriptyline treatment. These findings provided preliminary evidence regarding the possible role of NAC as an adjunct therapy in the management of CPPS in women, which needs to be validated in future studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Women s Health Reviews
Current Women s Health Reviews OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Current Women"s Health Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on obstetrics and gynecology. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms with Herbal Medicines: A Review Menstrual Cup Awareness and Future Usage Possibilities of Consumers: A Cross-sectional Study Comparison of the Effectiveness of Endometrial Scratching in Follicular and Luteal Phases in Pregnancy Rate of Frozen Embryo Transfer Candidate Women Marital Satisfaction in Postpartum Women: The Role of Personality, Body Image Satisfaction, Anxiety, and Sexual Function A Complex Condition; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Review of its Recent Advanced Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1