{"title":"用迭代应力消除模型预测跨晶界剪切透射","authors":"Yang Su, Songyang Han, P. Eisenlohr, M. Crimp","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3730362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new model is proposed to quantitatively describe the accommodation of shear from multiple deformation systems at a grain boundary. The model uses an iterative approach to sequentially determine the accommodating slip systems and their relative shear. The outcome of this iterative stress relief model is mainly controlled by the continuity of Burgers vector in the grain boundary and the evolution of the impinging stress tensor at the grain boundary. The model was tested by comparing predictions with observations of shear accommodation in a -titanium quantified using orientation informed slip trace analysis and quantitative atomic force microscopy. Similar comparisons were conducted between tangential continuity model predictions and the experimental observations. These comparisons show that the iterative stress relief model agrees much better with the observations when used to predict the accommodating deformation system(s) compared to the tangential continuity model. Critical resolved shear stress ratios used in this iterative stress relief were optimized by maximizing the accuracy of the model predictions. The ranges of the optimized critical resolved shear stress ratios were determined to be basal 〈a〉: prism 〈a〉: pyramidal 〈a〉: pyramidal 〈c+a〉: T1 twin = 1.0 : (0.8–1.0) : (1.0–1.3) : (1.6–9.5) : (3.0–9.5).","PeriodicalId":9858,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering (Engineering) eJournal","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Shear Transmission Across Grain Boundaries with an Iterative Stress Relief Model\",\"authors\":\"Yang Su, Songyang Han, P. Eisenlohr, M. Crimp\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3730362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A new model is proposed to quantitatively describe the accommodation of shear from multiple deformation systems at a grain boundary. The model uses an iterative approach to sequentially determine the accommodating slip systems and their relative shear. The outcome of this iterative stress relief model is mainly controlled by the continuity of Burgers vector in the grain boundary and the evolution of the impinging stress tensor at the grain boundary. The model was tested by comparing predictions with observations of shear accommodation in a -titanium quantified using orientation informed slip trace analysis and quantitative atomic force microscopy. Similar comparisons were conducted between tangential continuity model predictions and the experimental observations. These comparisons show that the iterative stress relief model agrees much better with the observations when used to predict the accommodating deformation system(s) compared to the tangential continuity model. Critical resolved shear stress ratios used in this iterative stress relief were optimized by maximizing the accuracy of the model predictions. The ranges of the optimized critical resolved shear stress ratios were determined to be basal 〈a〉: prism 〈a〉: pyramidal 〈a〉: pyramidal 〈c+a〉: T1 twin = 1.0 : (0.8–1.0) : (1.0–1.3) : (1.6–9.5) : (3.0–9.5).\",\"PeriodicalId\":9858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Engineering (Engineering) eJournal\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Engineering (Engineering) eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3730362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering (Engineering) eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3730362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
提出了一种新的模型来定量描述晶界上多个变形系统的剪切调节。该模型采用迭代法依次确定容纳滑移系统及其相对剪切。该迭代应力消除模型的结果主要受晶界Burgers矢量的连续性和晶界处冲击应力张量的演化控制。通过将预测结果与使用定向滑移迹分析和定量原子力显微镜量化的-钛中剪切调节的观察结果进行比较,对该模型进行了测试。切向连续性模型的预测结果与实验观测结果也进行了类似的比较。这些比较表明,与切向连续模型相比,迭代应力释放模型在预测可容纳变形系统时与观测结果吻合得更好。通过最大化模型预测的准确性,优化了迭代应力释放中使用的临界分解剪应力比。优化后的临界分解剪应力比范围为:基底< a >:棱柱< a >:锥体< a >:锥体< c+a >: T1孪晶= 1.0:(0.8-1.0):(1.0 - 1.3):(1.6-9.5):(3.0-9.5)。
Predicting Shear Transmission Across Grain Boundaries with an Iterative Stress Relief Model
A new model is proposed to quantitatively describe the accommodation of shear from multiple deformation systems at a grain boundary. The model uses an iterative approach to sequentially determine the accommodating slip systems and their relative shear. The outcome of this iterative stress relief model is mainly controlled by the continuity of Burgers vector in the grain boundary and the evolution of the impinging stress tensor at the grain boundary. The model was tested by comparing predictions with observations of shear accommodation in a -titanium quantified using orientation informed slip trace analysis and quantitative atomic force microscopy. Similar comparisons were conducted between tangential continuity model predictions and the experimental observations. These comparisons show that the iterative stress relief model agrees much better with the observations when used to predict the accommodating deformation system(s) compared to the tangential continuity model. Critical resolved shear stress ratios used in this iterative stress relief were optimized by maximizing the accuracy of the model predictions. The ranges of the optimized critical resolved shear stress ratios were determined to be basal 〈a〉: prism 〈a〉: pyramidal 〈a〉: pyramidal 〈c+a〉: T1 twin = 1.0 : (0.8–1.0) : (1.0–1.3) : (1.6–9.5) : (3.0–9.5).