专业优势?19世纪上半叶哈布斯堡王朝时期医生和病人之间的接触

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Dynamis Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI:10.30827/dynamis.v41i2.24534
Vladan Hanulík
{"title":"专业优势?19世纪上半叶哈布斯堡王朝时期医生和病人之间的接触","authors":"Vladan Hanulík","doi":"10.30827/dynamis.v41i2.24534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Vienna, the tradition of clinical teaching began with Anton de Haen’s introduction of the newly established educational approach in the Buergerspital in 1754. In the second half of the 18th century, clinical teaching at medical faculties contributed to the shift of power relationships between doctors and patients. The medical gaze that the doctor and the patient directed towards each other regulated the patients’ as well as the physicians’ behavior in the setting of hospital medicine, but this does not mean that a wholesale transformation of the medical field took place. Patients were not mere passive objects of externally controlled processes but influential agents of medical process. Middle- and upper-class patients sought assistance from their family general practitioners even at the beginning of the 20th century, and the relationships between these family doctors and their patients were more equal. Up to the end of the 19th century, physician-patient contact often comprised traditional methods of consultation by letter, and physicians saw and treated their patients predominantly in the patient’s homes. A doctor’s medical authority was not solely based on his knowledge, skills, and reputation among colleagues at the medical faculty. As in the early modern tradition of doctor-patient encounters, patients continued to play the role of ultimate arbiter of the performativity of physicians.","PeriodicalId":50561,"journal":{"name":"Dynamis","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional dominance? Encounters between physicians and patients in the first half of the 19th century under the Habsburg Monarchy\",\"authors\":\"Vladan Hanulík\",\"doi\":\"10.30827/dynamis.v41i2.24534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Vienna, the tradition of clinical teaching began with Anton de Haen’s introduction of the newly established educational approach in the Buergerspital in 1754. In the second half of the 18th century, clinical teaching at medical faculties contributed to the shift of power relationships between doctors and patients. The medical gaze that the doctor and the patient directed towards each other regulated the patients’ as well as the physicians’ behavior in the setting of hospital medicine, but this does not mean that a wholesale transformation of the medical field took place. Patients were not mere passive objects of externally controlled processes but influential agents of medical process. Middle- and upper-class patients sought assistance from their family general practitioners even at the beginning of the 20th century, and the relationships between these family doctors and their patients were more equal. Up to the end of the 19th century, physician-patient contact often comprised traditional methods of consultation by letter, and physicians saw and treated their patients predominantly in the patient’s homes. A doctor’s medical authority was not solely based on his knowledge, skills, and reputation among colleagues at the medical faculty. As in the early modern tradition of doctor-patient encounters, patients continued to play the role of ultimate arbiter of the performativity of physicians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dynamis\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dynamis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30827/dynamis.v41i2.24534\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamis","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30827/dynamis.v41i2.24534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在维也纳,临床教学的传统始于安东·德·海恩(Anton de Haen)于1754年在伯格医院(Buergerspital)引入的新建立的教育方法。18世纪下半叶,医学院的临床教学促成了医患之间权力关系的转变。在医院医学的背景下,医生和病人对彼此的医疗凝视规范了病人和医生的行为,但这并不意味着医疗领域发生了大规模的转变。患者不再是外界控制过程的被动客体,而是医疗过程的影响主体。早在20世纪初,中上层社会的患者就开始向家庭全科医生寻求帮助,家庭医生与患者之间的关系更加平等。直到19世纪末,医患接触通常包括传统的写信咨询方式,医生主要在病人家里看病和治疗。医生的医学权威不仅仅是基于他的知识、技能和在医学院同事中的声誉。在早期的现代医患接触传统中,患者继续扮演着医生表现的最终仲裁者的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Professional dominance? Encounters between physicians and patients in the first half of the 19th century under the Habsburg Monarchy
In Vienna, the tradition of clinical teaching began with Anton de Haen’s introduction of the newly established educational approach in the Buergerspital in 1754. In the second half of the 18th century, clinical teaching at medical faculties contributed to the shift of power relationships between doctors and patients. The medical gaze that the doctor and the patient directed towards each other regulated the patients’ as well as the physicians’ behavior in the setting of hospital medicine, but this does not mean that a wholesale transformation of the medical field took place. Patients were not mere passive objects of externally controlled processes but influential agents of medical process. Middle- and upper-class patients sought assistance from their family general practitioners even at the beginning of the 20th century, and the relationships between these family doctors and their patients were more equal. Up to the end of the 19th century, physician-patient contact often comprised traditional methods of consultation by letter, and physicians saw and treated their patients predominantly in the patient’s homes. A doctor’s medical authority was not solely based on his knowledge, skills, and reputation among colleagues at the medical faculty. As in the early modern tradition of doctor-patient encounters, patients continued to play the role of ultimate arbiter of the performativity of physicians.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dynamis
Dynamis 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: DYNAMIS is an international journal devoted to the history of medicine, health and science, founded in 1981, that pays special attention to novel and interdisciplinary historiographic perspectives. It offers original, double peer-reviewed research studies (articles, notes or documents) and reviews in languages of the European Union.
期刊最新文献
Las láminas zootómicas del profesor Paul Pfurtscheller de Viena: un material científico renovador en las aulas españolas en el primer tercio de siglo XX El cuidado del cuerpo en la Edad Media y el Renacimiento: entre la cosmética y la salud La repuesta a las epidemias en los siglos XIX y XX: un estudio comparado entre Portugal y Chile Los inicios de la bacteriología en Buenos Aires en el siglo XIX: transformaciones institucionales y políticas sanitarias En pos de la belleza. Cuidado de rostro y cabellos en el corpus textual hebreo de medicina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1