基于轴向三维磁共振成像的颈神经孔狭窄分级的可靠性

{"title":"基于轴向三维磁共振成像的颈神经孔狭窄分级的可靠性","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.02.13783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the reliability of cervical neural foramen stenosis (CNFS) grading by using three-dimensional (3D) T1W, 3D T2W, and twodimensional (2D) T2W images in axial plane.\n\nMaterials and Methods: The authors enrolled 32 patients between December 2019 and February 2020 who underwent cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with clinical manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Two blinded radiologists interpreted the axial 3D T1W TSE, 3D T2W TSE, and 2D T2W TSE images using a 4-point visual scale for CNFS grading in all cervical levels. Intra-observer agreement of CNFS grading on the three imaging pulse sequences for each observer and inter-observer agreement between both observers were analyzed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).\n\nResults: Three hundred eighty-four neural foramina were evaluated. The overall mean intra-observer agreement of CNFS grading was strong on the axial 3D T1W TSE, 3D T2W TSE, and 2D T2W TSE images for each observer with ICC values of 0.79 and 0.82. The overall mean inter-observer agreement for CNFS grading was strong on 3D T1W TSE, 3D T2W TSE, and 2D T2W TSE images with ICC values of 0.79, 0.79, and 0.86, respectively.\n\nConclusion: Axial 3D T1W TSE, 3D T2W TSE, and 2D T2W TSE images exhibited comparable strong reliability in the grading of cervical neural foramen stenosis without the significant benefit of 3D over 2D technique.\n\nKeywords: Cervical spine; Neural foramen stenosis; MRI; Grading","PeriodicalId":17486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Cervical Neural Foramen Stenosis Grading Based on Axial Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Images\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.02.13783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To assess the reliability of cervical neural foramen stenosis (CNFS) grading by using three-dimensional (3D) T1W, 3D T2W, and twodimensional (2D) T2W images in axial plane.\\n\\nMaterials and Methods: The authors enrolled 32 patients between December 2019 and February 2020 who underwent cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with clinical manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Two blinded radiologists interpreted the axial 3D T1W TSE, 3D T2W TSE, and 2D T2W TSE images using a 4-point visual scale for CNFS grading in all cervical levels. Intra-observer agreement of CNFS grading on the three imaging pulse sequences for each observer and inter-observer agreement between both observers were analyzed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).\\n\\nResults: Three hundred eighty-four neural foramina were evaluated. The overall mean intra-observer agreement of CNFS grading was strong on the axial 3D T1W TSE, 3D T2W TSE, and 2D T2W TSE images for each observer with ICC values of 0.79 and 0.82. The overall mean inter-observer agreement for CNFS grading was strong on 3D T1W TSE, 3D T2W TSE, and 2D T2W TSE images with ICC values of 0.79, 0.79, and 0.86, respectively.\\n\\nConclusion: Axial 3D T1W TSE, 3D T2W TSE, and 2D T2W TSE images exhibited comparable strong reliability in the grading of cervical neural foramen stenosis without the significant benefit of 3D over 2D technique.\\n\\nKeywords: Cervical spine; Neural foramen stenosis; MRI; Grading\",\"PeriodicalId\":17486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.02.13783\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.02.13783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用三维(3D) T1W、三维(3D) T2W和二维(2D) T2W轴位图像评价颈椎神经孔狭窄(CNFS)分级的可靠性。材料与方法:作者在2019年12月至2020年2月期间招募了32名临床表现为颈椎病的患者进行颈椎磁共振成像(MRI)检查。两名盲法放射科医生对轴向三维T1W TSE、三维T2W TSE和二维T2W TSE图像进行解读,采用4点视觉评分法对所有颈椎水平进行CNFS分级。利用类内相关系数(intracclass correlation coefficient, ICC)分析每个观测者对三个成像脉冲序列CNFS分级的观测者内一致性和观测者间一致性。结果:共检查384个神经孔。在每个观察者的轴向3D T1W TSE、3D T2W TSE和2D T2W TSE图像上,CNFS分级的总体平均观察者内部一致性很强,ICC值为0.79和0.82。在3D T1W TSE、3D T2W TSE和2D T2W TSE图像上,CNFS分级的总体平均观察者间一致性很强,ICC值分别为0.79、0.79和0.86。结论:轴向3D T1W TSE、3D T2W TSE和2D T2W TSE图像对颈椎神经孔狭窄的分级具有相当强的可靠性,3D技术没有明显优于2D技术。关键词:颈椎;神经孔狭窄;核磁共振;分级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of Cervical Neural Foramen Stenosis Grading Based on Axial Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Images
Objective: To assess the reliability of cervical neural foramen stenosis (CNFS) grading by using three-dimensional (3D) T1W, 3D T2W, and twodimensional (2D) T2W images in axial plane. Materials and Methods: The authors enrolled 32 patients between December 2019 and February 2020 who underwent cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with clinical manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Two blinded radiologists interpreted the axial 3D T1W TSE, 3D T2W TSE, and 2D T2W TSE images using a 4-point visual scale for CNFS grading in all cervical levels. Intra-observer agreement of CNFS grading on the three imaging pulse sequences for each observer and inter-observer agreement between both observers were analyzed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Three hundred eighty-four neural foramina were evaluated. The overall mean intra-observer agreement of CNFS grading was strong on the axial 3D T1W TSE, 3D T2W TSE, and 2D T2W TSE images for each observer with ICC values of 0.79 and 0.82. The overall mean inter-observer agreement for CNFS grading was strong on 3D T1W TSE, 3D T2W TSE, and 2D T2W TSE images with ICC values of 0.79, 0.79, and 0.86, respectively. Conclusion: Axial 3D T1W TSE, 3D T2W TSE, and 2D T2W TSE images exhibited comparable strong reliability in the grading of cervical neural foramen stenosis without the significant benefit of 3D over 2D technique. Keywords: Cervical spine; Neural foramen stenosis; MRI; Grading
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) and Conventional Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) Behavioral Risk Score for Predicting Well-Controlled HbA1c Level in Diabetes Type 2 Patients The Choice of Anesthesia after First Failed Spinal Block and Its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study Efficacy of Levetiracetam versus Phenytoin in Neonatal Seizure in Rural Area of Thailand Spontaneous Sternal Fracture in Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1