Yi Liu, M. Junaid, Naima Hamid, Chun-Di Chen, Desheng Pei
{"title":"重点物质(ps)和新兴关注污染物(CECs)的环境问题和毒理学终点:综合综述","authors":"Yi Liu, M. Junaid, Naima Hamid, Chun-Di Chen, Desheng Pei","doi":"10.3844/AJESSP.2018.129.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Priority Substance (PSs) and Contaminant of Emerging Concerns (CECs) exhibited a wide range of environmental and public health concerns worldwide. This review summarized the documented studies related to the current surface water occurrence, spatial distribution, ecological risks and toxicity of selected PSs, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and CECs, such as Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP) and Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs). The spatial distribution analysis revealed alarming levels of PAHs in the surface waters of Asian counties, e.g., 84210 ng L-1 in Gomti River, India, 29325 ng L-1 in Daya Bay, China and 1287 ng L-1 in Chenab River, Pakistan. As for DEHP, the highest concentrations of 13050 µg L-1 in Liao River, China, and 2306 µg L-1 in Rivers of Eastern Cape, South Africa were reported. These environmental levels of PAHs and DEHP were many folds higher than the surface water permissible levels devised by WHO and USEPA. Contrarily, the emerging PPCPs were reported in relatively lower levels in the surface waters globally, compared to that of PAHs and DEHP. Consistent with the environmental levels, PAHs and DEHP revealed alarming ecological risks in the surface water sources, compared to that of PPCPs. Regarding to the sources of PSs and CECs, PAHs emissions were mostly linked to the incomplete combustion of petroleum products, DEHP contamination was associated to its applications in consumption and production of plastic appliances and PPCPs emissions were largely related to the domestic and industrial effluents. As for toxic endpoints of PAHs, DEHP and PPCPs, all of these were reported to cause DNA damage, genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity and immunotoxicity, as revealed in reviewed in vitro/vivo studies. In addition, the current review also highlighted the existing environmental regulations to control the emissions of these pollutants to the environmental matrices. Taken together, this review concluded that despite the existing environmental regulations, the current levels of organic pollutants are still on rising, especially in Asian countries. Therefore, the strict implementation of the existing regulations is highly necessary to control these pollutants to ensure public health and ecological integrity.","PeriodicalId":7487,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Environmental Sciences","volume":"207 1","pages":"129-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Concerns and Toxicogenetic Endpoints of Priority Substances (PSs) and Contaminants of Emerging Concerns (CECs): A Comprehensive Review\",\"authors\":\"Yi Liu, M. Junaid, Naima Hamid, Chun-Di Chen, Desheng Pei\",\"doi\":\"10.3844/AJESSP.2018.129.155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Priority Substance (PSs) and Contaminant of Emerging Concerns (CECs) exhibited a wide range of environmental and public health concerns worldwide. This review summarized the documented studies related to the current surface water occurrence, spatial distribution, ecological risks and toxicity of selected PSs, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and CECs, such as Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP) and Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs). The spatial distribution analysis revealed alarming levels of PAHs in the surface waters of Asian counties, e.g., 84210 ng L-1 in Gomti River, India, 29325 ng L-1 in Daya Bay, China and 1287 ng L-1 in Chenab River, Pakistan. As for DEHP, the highest concentrations of 13050 µg L-1 in Liao River, China, and 2306 µg L-1 in Rivers of Eastern Cape, South Africa were reported. These environmental levels of PAHs and DEHP were many folds higher than the surface water permissible levels devised by WHO and USEPA. Contrarily, the emerging PPCPs were reported in relatively lower levels in the surface waters globally, compared to that of PAHs and DEHP. Consistent with the environmental levels, PAHs and DEHP revealed alarming ecological risks in the surface water sources, compared to that of PPCPs. Regarding to the sources of PSs and CECs, PAHs emissions were mostly linked to the incomplete combustion of petroleum products, DEHP contamination was associated to its applications in consumption and production of plastic appliances and PPCPs emissions were largely related to the domestic and industrial effluents. As for toxic endpoints of PAHs, DEHP and PPCPs, all of these were reported to cause DNA damage, genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity and immunotoxicity, as revealed in reviewed in vitro/vivo studies. In addition, the current review also highlighted the existing environmental regulations to control the emissions of these pollutants to the environmental matrices. Taken together, this review concluded that despite the existing environmental regulations, the current levels of organic pollutants are still on rising, especially in Asian countries. Therefore, the strict implementation of the existing regulations is highly necessary to control these pollutants to ensure public health and ecological integrity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Environmental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"207 1\",\"pages\":\"129-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Environmental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3844/AJESSP.2018.129.155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/AJESSP.2018.129.155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
优先物质(ps)和新出现的关注污染物(CECs)在世界范围内表现出广泛的环境和公共卫生问题。本文综述了国内外有关多环芳烃(PAHs)和CECs(邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)、药品和个人护理用品(PPCPs)等)在地表水中的分布、空间分布、生态风险和毒性的研究进展。空间分布分析显示,印度贡提河(Gomti River)、中国大亚湾(Daya Bay)和巴基斯坦切纳布河(Chenab River)表层水体多环芳烃含量分别为84210 ng L-1、29325 ng L-1和1287 ng L-1。DEHP的最高浓度分别为13050 µg L-1和2306 µg L-1,分别为中国辽河和南非东开普省。这些多环芳烃和DEHP的环境水平比世界卫生组织和美国环境保护局规定的地表水允许水平高出许多倍。相反,与多环芳烃和DEHP相比,全球地表水中新出现的PPCPs的含量相对较低。与环境水平一致,与PPCPs相比,PAHs和DEHP在地表水水源中显示出惊人的生态风险。多环芳烃的排放主要与石油产品的不完全燃烧有关,DEHP的污染主要与塑料器具的消费和生产有关,PPCPs的排放主要与家庭和工业废水有关。对于多环芳烃、DEHP和PPCPs的毒性终点,体外/体内研究表明,它们都有DNA损伤、遗传毒性、生殖毒性、发育毒性和免疫毒性的报道。此外,目前的审查还强调了控制这些污染物向环境基质排放的现有环境条例。综上所述,本次审查的结论是,尽管现有的环境法规,目前的有机污染物水平仍在上升,特别是在亚洲国家。因此,严格执行现有法规是非常必要的,以控制这些污染物,以确保公众健康和生态完整性。
Environmental Concerns and Toxicogenetic Endpoints of Priority Substances (PSs) and Contaminants of Emerging Concerns (CECs): A Comprehensive Review
Priority Substance (PSs) and Contaminant of Emerging Concerns (CECs) exhibited a wide range of environmental and public health concerns worldwide. This review summarized the documented studies related to the current surface water occurrence, spatial distribution, ecological risks and toxicity of selected PSs, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and CECs, such as Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP) and Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs). The spatial distribution analysis revealed alarming levels of PAHs in the surface waters of Asian counties, e.g., 84210 ng L-1 in Gomti River, India, 29325 ng L-1 in Daya Bay, China and 1287 ng L-1 in Chenab River, Pakistan. As for DEHP, the highest concentrations of 13050 µg L-1 in Liao River, China, and 2306 µg L-1 in Rivers of Eastern Cape, South Africa were reported. These environmental levels of PAHs and DEHP were many folds higher than the surface water permissible levels devised by WHO and USEPA. Contrarily, the emerging PPCPs were reported in relatively lower levels in the surface waters globally, compared to that of PAHs and DEHP. Consistent with the environmental levels, PAHs and DEHP revealed alarming ecological risks in the surface water sources, compared to that of PPCPs. Regarding to the sources of PSs and CECs, PAHs emissions were mostly linked to the incomplete combustion of petroleum products, DEHP contamination was associated to its applications in consumption and production of plastic appliances and PPCPs emissions were largely related to the domestic and industrial effluents. As for toxic endpoints of PAHs, DEHP and PPCPs, all of these were reported to cause DNA damage, genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity and immunotoxicity, as revealed in reviewed in vitro/vivo studies. In addition, the current review also highlighted the existing environmental regulations to control the emissions of these pollutants to the environmental matrices. Taken together, this review concluded that despite the existing environmental regulations, the current levels of organic pollutants are still on rising, especially in Asian countries. Therefore, the strict implementation of the existing regulations is highly necessary to control these pollutants to ensure public health and ecological integrity.