合宪性的界限?法律及政策上的中央资助计划

Anupama Kumar
{"title":"合宪性的界限?法律及政策上的中央资助计划","authors":"Anupama Kumar","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2021.1998754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS) as a means of Union-State fiscal transfers in light of Article 282 of the Constitution. CSS are programmes designed and funded by the Union government on subjects in the State and Concurrent Lists, to be implemented by various State governments. In this paper, I argue that CSS permit the Union to exercise a high degree of control over the use of finances by the States. In effect, therefore, the Union’s spending power to frame CSS can intrude on States’ powers to frame and execute programmes on subjects that ought properly to be in their exclusive competence. I argue that even though CSS are constitutional under Article 282, they nevertheless have important practical consequences for Indian federalism","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The limits of constitutionality? Centrally Sponsored Schemes in law and policy\",\"authors\":\"Anupama Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24730580.2021.1998754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper examines Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS) as a means of Union-State fiscal transfers in light of Article 282 of the Constitution. CSS are programmes designed and funded by the Union government on subjects in the State and Concurrent Lists, to be implemented by various State governments. In this paper, I argue that CSS permit the Union to exercise a high degree of control over the use of finances by the States. In effect, therefore, the Union’s spending power to frame CSS can intrude on States’ powers to frame and execute programmes on subjects that ought properly to be in their exclusive competence. I argue that even though CSS are constitutional under Article 282, they nevertheless have important practical consequences for Indian federalism\",\"PeriodicalId\":13511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2021.1998754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2021.1998754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文根据宪法第282条,研究了中央赞助计划(CSS)作为联盟-国家财政转移的一种手段。CSS是由联邦政府设计和资助的关于邦和并行清单主题的方案,由各邦政府实施。在本文中,我认为CSS允许联盟对各州的财政使用行使高度控制。因此,实际上,欧盟制定CSS的支出权力可能会侵犯各国制定和执行有关主题的方案的权力,而这些主题本应属于它们的专属权限。我认为,尽管CSS符合宪法第282条,但它们对印度联邦制具有重要的实际影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The limits of constitutionality? Centrally Sponsored Schemes in law and policy
ABSTRACT This paper examines Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS) as a means of Union-State fiscal transfers in light of Article 282 of the Constitution. CSS are programmes designed and funded by the Union government on subjects in the State and Concurrent Lists, to be implemented by various State governments. In this paper, I argue that CSS permit the Union to exercise a high degree of control over the use of finances by the States. In effect, therefore, the Union’s spending power to frame CSS can intrude on States’ powers to frame and execute programmes on subjects that ought properly to be in their exclusive competence. I argue that even though CSS are constitutional under Article 282, they nevertheless have important practical consequences for Indian federalism
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interpreting without bannisters? The abstraction problem afflicting the basic structure doctrine Courts, mining conflicts, and Adivasi rights: a case study from central India (2000–2022) “ Mutated Sumangali Scheme ”: challenges in enforcement of labour laws in spinning mills of Tamil Nadu Protection of stakeholders’ interests in the Indian corporate landscape: examining the “ifs and buts” The maze of interpretation: abortion laws and legal indeterminacy in Indian courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1