静脉注射异丙嗪与地西泮减轻急诊部周围性眩晕症状的双盲临床试验

S. Hayati, R. Yazdani, S. Fallahi, Zivar Atashbar, Seyed, Ashkan Tabibzadeh Dezfuli
{"title":"静脉注射异丙嗪与地西泮减轻急诊部周围性眩晕症状的双盲临床试验","authors":"S. Hayati, R. Yazdani, S. Fallahi, Zivar Atashbar, Seyed, Ashkan Tabibzadeh Dezfuli","doi":"10.33945/sami/ecc.2019.6.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research aimed at comparing the effectiveness of promethazine and diazepam in patients suffering from acute peripheral vertigo. This is a double blind clinical trial with a sample of 154 patients visiting the emergency section of Shahid Mohammadi Hospital in Bandar Abbas in 2017-18. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of 77, one treated with intravenous promethazine (50 mg) and the other with intravenous Diazepam (10 mg). The severity of vertigo was measured qualitatively and quantitatively 20 minutes later in both groups. Participants were 46 (29.9%) male and 108 (70.1%) female visiting the emergency section of hospital. The mean score of vertigo severity in Promethazine group was 44.44±17.94 and that of Diazepam group was 2.49±+3.87. The severity scores before and after the treatment in promethazine group were respectively 7.75±1.59 and 2.72±1.93. The mean scores of vertigo severity before and after the treatment in promethazine group was -5.04+2.10 and in the diazepam group it was -3.83+3.09. The intergroup difference was statistically significant (p=.013). The results revealed that intravenous promethazine and diazepam applied 20 minutes after prescription are both effective in controlling the severity of vertigo. Considering the probability of occurrence of extrapyramidal side-effects it can be suggested that the infusion of this medication can be done slowly as it takes longer time. Meanwhile, vital signs should be precisely controlled.","PeriodicalId":11871,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Chemical Communications","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous promethazine vs. diazepam to reduce symptoms of peripheral vertigo in emergency section: a double blind clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"S. Hayati, R. Yazdani, S. Fallahi, Zivar Atashbar, Seyed, Ashkan Tabibzadeh Dezfuli\",\"doi\":\"10.33945/sami/ecc.2019.6.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present research aimed at comparing the effectiveness of promethazine and diazepam in patients suffering from acute peripheral vertigo. This is a double blind clinical trial with a sample of 154 patients visiting the emergency section of Shahid Mohammadi Hospital in Bandar Abbas in 2017-18. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of 77, one treated with intravenous promethazine (50 mg) and the other with intravenous Diazepam (10 mg). The severity of vertigo was measured qualitatively and quantitatively 20 minutes later in both groups. Participants were 46 (29.9%) male and 108 (70.1%) female visiting the emergency section of hospital. The mean score of vertigo severity in Promethazine group was 44.44±17.94 and that of Diazepam group was 2.49±+3.87. The severity scores before and after the treatment in promethazine group were respectively 7.75±1.59 and 2.72±1.93. The mean scores of vertigo severity before and after the treatment in promethazine group was -5.04+2.10 and in the diazepam group it was -3.83+3.09. The intergroup difference was statistically significant (p=.013). The results revealed that intravenous promethazine and diazepam applied 20 minutes after prescription are both effective in controlling the severity of vertigo. Considering the probability of occurrence of extrapyramidal side-effects it can be suggested that the infusion of this medication can be done slowly as it takes longer time. Meanwhile, vital signs should be precisely controlled.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Chemical Communications\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Chemical Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33945/sami/ecc.2019.6.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Chemical Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33945/sami/ecc.2019.6.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Chemistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较异丙嗪和地西泮治疗急性周围性眩晕的疗效。这是一项双盲临床试验,样本为2017-18年在阿巴斯港沙希德·穆罕默德医院急诊科就诊的154名患者。参与者被随机分为两组,每组77人,一组静脉注射异丙嗪(50毫克),另一组静脉注射安定(10毫克)。20分钟后对两组眩晕程度进行定性和定量测量。在医院急诊科就诊的46名男性(29.9%)和108名女性(70.1%)。异丙嗪组眩晕严重程度平均评分为44.44±17.94分,地西泮组平均评分为2.49±+3.87分。异丙嗪组治疗前后严重程度评分分别为7.75±1.59和2.72±1.93。异丙嗪组治疗前后眩晕严重程度平均评分为-5.04+2.10,地西泮组治疗前后眩晕严重程度平均评分为-3.83+3.09。组间差异有统计学意义(p= 0.013)。结果显示,处方后20分钟静脉注射异丙嗪和地西泮均能有效控制眩晕的严重程度。考虑到发生锥体外系副作用的可能性,建议输液时间较长,可以缓慢进行。同时,要精确控制生命体征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intravenous promethazine vs. diazepam to reduce symptoms of peripheral vertigo in emergency section: a double blind clinical trial
The present research aimed at comparing the effectiveness of promethazine and diazepam in patients suffering from acute peripheral vertigo. This is a double blind clinical trial with a sample of 154 patients visiting the emergency section of Shahid Mohammadi Hospital in Bandar Abbas in 2017-18. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of 77, one treated with intravenous promethazine (50 mg) and the other with intravenous Diazepam (10 mg). The severity of vertigo was measured qualitatively and quantitatively 20 minutes later in both groups. Participants were 46 (29.9%) male and 108 (70.1%) female visiting the emergency section of hospital. The mean score of vertigo severity in Promethazine group was 44.44±17.94 and that of Diazepam group was 2.49±+3.87. The severity scores before and after the treatment in promethazine group were respectively 7.75±1.59 and 2.72±1.93. The mean scores of vertigo severity before and after the treatment in promethazine group was -5.04+2.10 and in the diazepam group it was -3.83+3.09. The intergroup difference was statistically significant (p=.013). The results revealed that intravenous promethazine and diazepam applied 20 minutes after prescription are both effective in controlling the severity of vertigo. Considering the probability of occurrence of extrapyramidal side-effects it can be suggested that the infusion of this medication can be done slowly as it takes longer time. Meanwhile, vital signs should be precisely controlled.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eurasian Chemical Communications
Eurasian Chemical Communications CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post corona: Chemicals, environmental factors, and public health The dual role of ammonium acetate as reagent and catalyst in the synthesis of 2, 4, 5-triaryl-1H-imidazoles Modified nano-γ-alumina with 2, 4-‌dinitrophenyl hydrazine as an efficient adsorbent for the removal of everzol red 3BS dye from aqueous solutions Catalytic evaluation of newly prepared GO-SB-H2PMo as an efficient and reusable nanocatalyst for the neat synthesis of amidoalkyl naphthols Hyaluronic acid hydrogel nanoscaffolds: production and assessment of the physicochemical properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1