为外国利益而战的俄国:1747年英俄外交官关于补贴公约的谈判

T. Labutina
{"title":"为外国利益而战的俄国:1747年英俄外交官关于补贴公约的谈判","authors":"T. Labutina","doi":"10.31857/s013038640025910-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1740–1748, the War of the Austrian Succession took place in Europe, which involved France, Britain, Prussia, Austria and a number of other countries seeking to conquer territories both within and outside Europe. In 1748 Russia, which had no such objectives, also entered the war. In fact, Russia had been drawn into the war by Great Britain through the signing of the three Subsidy Conventions of 1747. This involved the use of a Russian military corps by the British in return for the payment of monetary subsidies. The British Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, John Carmichael, 3rd Earl of Hyndford, was a witness to these events and also one of the principal negotiators of the conventions. Drawing on reports from the Ambassador to the Russian court to the British Secretary of State, the author provides the first detailed analysis of the negotiation process, showing its inner workings through the diplomat's reports, which allows one to determine which position each side took and what goals they were pursuing. Attention is drawn to the complex nature of the negotiations and the difficulties that diplomats on both sides had to face in negotiating a number of issues, including the manner and amount of subsidies, the choice of commanders, the cost of food and medical treatment for troops from the Russian corps, etc. This issue is addressed for the first time in historical scholarship. As analysis of both Hyndford's reports and the Secretary of State's dispatches demonstrates, persistence in pursuing objectives, the pursuit of one's own interests alone, firmness of position, as well as blackmail and bribery, were all used by British diplomacy in the negotiation process. In turn, the Russian govern-ment, represented by Empress Elizabeth Petrovna and Chancellor Alexey Bestuzhev-Rumin, persistently and consistently defended the interests of the Russian Empire. Through the subsidy conventions, which provided support for Britain and the Netherlands, the War of the Austrian Succession soon came to an end, but as a result Russia was not among the beneficiaries.","PeriodicalId":82203,"journal":{"name":"Novaia i noveishaia istoriia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russia in War for Foreign Interests: Negotiations Between British and Rus-sian Diplomats on the Subsidy Conventions of 1747\",\"authors\":\"T. Labutina\",\"doi\":\"10.31857/s013038640025910-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1740–1748, the War of the Austrian Succession took place in Europe, which involved France, Britain, Prussia, Austria and a number of other countries seeking to conquer territories both within and outside Europe. In 1748 Russia, which had no such objectives, also entered the war. In fact, Russia had been drawn into the war by Great Britain through the signing of the three Subsidy Conventions of 1747. This involved the use of a Russian military corps by the British in return for the payment of monetary subsidies. The British Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, John Carmichael, 3rd Earl of Hyndford, was a witness to these events and also one of the principal negotiators of the conventions. Drawing on reports from the Ambassador to the Russian court to the British Secretary of State, the author provides the first detailed analysis of the negotiation process, showing its inner workings through the diplomat's reports, which allows one to determine which position each side took and what goals they were pursuing. Attention is drawn to the complex nature of the negotiations and the difficulties that diplomats on both sides had to face in negotiating a number of issues, including the manner and amount of subsidies, the choice of commanders, the cost of food and medical treatment for troops from the Russian corps, etc. This issue is addressed for the first time in historical scholarship. As analysis of both Hyndford's reports and the Secretary of State's dispatches demonstrates, persistence in pursuing objectives, the pursuit of one's own interests alone, firmness of position, as well as blackmail and bribery, were all used by British diplomacy in the negotiation process. In turn, the Russian govern-ment, represented by Empress Elizabeth Petrovna and Chancellor Alexey Bestuzhev-Rumin, persistently and consistently defended the interests of the Russian Empire. Through the subsidy conventions, which provided support for Britain and the Netherlands, the War of the Austrian Succession soon came to an end, but as a result Russia was not among the beneficiaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Novaia i noveishaia istoriia\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Novaia i noveishaia istoriia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31857/s013038640025910-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novaia i noveishaia istoriia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s013038640025910-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1740年至1748年,奥地利王位继承战争在欧洲爆发,法国、英国、普鲁士、奥地利和其他一些国家都试图征服欧洲内外的领土。1748年,没有这样目标的俄罗斯也加入了战争。事实上,俄国是通过签署1747年的三个补贴公约而被英国拖入战争的。这涉及到英国使用俄罗斯军队以换取货币补贴。英国特命全权大使约翰·卡迈克尔,第三代海因福德伯爵,是这些事件的见证人,也是公约的主要谈判者之一。根据驻俄罗斯法院大使向英国国务卿提交的报告,作者首次详细分析了谈判过程,通过外交官的报告展示了谈判过程的内部运作,从而使人们能够确定双方采取的立场和他们追求的目标。委员会提请注意,谈判的复杂性以及双方外交官在谈判若干问题时所面临的困难,这些问题包括补贴的方式和数额、指挥官的选择、俄罗斯军团部队的食品和医疗费用等。这是历史学界第一次讨论这个问题。通过分析Hyndford的报告和国务卿的电报可以看出,英国外交在谈判过程中使用了坚持追求目标、只追求自己的利益、立场坚定以及敲诈和贿赂等手段。反过来,以伊丽莎白·彼得罗夫娜皇后和总理阿列克谢·别斯图热夫·鲁明为代表的俄罗斯政府坚持不懈地维护俄罗斯帝国的利益。通过向英国和荷兰提供支持的补贴公约,奥地利王位继承战争很快就结束了,但结果俄罗斯并不是受益者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Russia in War for Foreign Interests: Negotiations Between British and Rus-sian Diplomats on the Subsidy Conventions of 1747
In 1740–1748, the War of the Austrian Succession took place in Europe, which involved France, Britain, Prussia, Austria and a number of other countries seeking to conquer territories both within and outside Europe. In 1748 Russia, which had no such objectives, also entered the war. In fact, Russia had been drawn into the war by Great Britain through the signing of the three Subsidy Conventions of 1747. This involved the use of a Russian military corps by the British in return for the payment of monetary subsidies. The British Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, John Carmichael, 3rd Earl of Hyndford, was a witness to these events and also one of the principal negotiators of the conventions. Drawing on reports from the Ambassador to the Russian court to the British Secretary of State, the author provides the first detailed analysis of the negotiation process, showing its inner workings through the diplomat's reports, which allows one to determine which position each side took and what goals they were pursuing. Attention is drawn to the complex nature of the negotiations and the difficulties that diplomats on both sides had to face in negotiating a number of issues, including the manner and amount of subsidies, the choice of commanders, the cost of food and medical treatment for troops from the Russian corps, etc. This issue is addressed for the first time in historical scholarship. As analysis of both Hyndford's reports and the Secretary of State's dispatches demonstrates, persistence in pursuing objectives, the pursuit of one's own interests alone, firmness of position, as well as blackmail and bribery, were all used by British diplomacy in the negotiation process. In turn, the Russian govern-ment, represented by Empress Elizabeth Petrovna and Chancellor Alexey Bestuzhev-Rumin, persistently and consistently defended the interests of the Russian Empire. Through the subsidy conventions, which provided support for Britain and the Netherlands, the War of the Austrian Succession soon came to an end, but as a result Russia was not among the beneficiaries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Two-Faced Janus”: Was Chancellor Alexey Bestuzhev-Ryumin in the Service of the British? “Germany and the Balkan Feud”: The Russian Press Assessment of German Policy During the Two Balkan Wars of 1912–1913 The Egyptian Campaign and the Middle East Heraldic America The Image of Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in the Russian Press During the Sanction Pressure on the Country, 1992–1995
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1