老年人和年轻人的样本匹配表现

Anette Brogård-Antonsen, E. Arntzen
{"title":"老年人和年轻人的样本匹配表现","authors":"Anette Brogård-Antonsen, E. Arntzen","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2020.1863068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present experiment studied the influence of simultaneous matching-to-sample (SMTS) or delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS 0 s) using the many-to-one (MTO) or one-to-many (OTM) training structures on the formation of equivalence classes in older and younger adults. Sixty older adults and 16 younger adults were divided into four groups: (1) SMTS-MTO, (2) SMTS-OTM, (3) DMTS 0 s-MTO, and (4) DMTS 0 s-OTM. All of the younger adults established conditional discriminations, whereas only 35 of the 60 older adults did the same. The SMTS-OTM had the lowest number of trials to mastery criterion for the older adults, and the SMTS-MTO group had the highest number of participants forming equivalence classes. In the younger adults, the differences in trials to mastery criterion were minimal, and there were no differences in the equivalence tests across groups. The older adults had a higher reaction time to comparison stimuli than the younger adults.","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Matching-to-sample performance in older and younger adults\",\"authors\":\"Anette Brogård-Antonsen, E. Arntzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15021149.2020.1863068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The present experiment studied the influence of simultaneous matching-to-sample (SMTS) or delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS 0 s) using the many-to-one (MTO) or one-to-many (OTM) training structures on the formation of equivalence classes in older and younger adults. Sixty older adults and 16 younger adults were divided into four groups: (1) SMTS-MTO, (2) SMTS-OTM, (3) DMTS 0 s-MTO, and (4) DMTS 0 s-OTM. All of the younger adults established conditional discriminations, whereas only 35 of the 60 older adults did the same. The SMTS-OTM had the lowest number of trials to mastery criterion for the older adults, and the SMTS-MTO group had the highest number of participants forming equivalence classes. In the younger adults, the differences in trials to mastery criterion were minimal, and there were no differences in the equivalence tests across groups. The older adults had a higher reaction time to comparison stimuli than the younger adults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2020.1863068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2020.1863068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本实验采用多对一(MTO)或一对多(OTM)训练结构,研究了同步匹配-样本(SMTS)或延迟匹配-样本(DMTS)对老年人和年轻人等价类形成的影响。60名老年人和16名年轻人被分为4组:(1)SMTS-MTO, (2) SMTS-OTM, (3) DMTS 0 - mto和(4)DMTS 0 - otm。所有的年轻人都建立了条件歧视,而60名老年人中只有35人建立了条件歧视。SMTS-OTM组对老年人掌握标准的试验次数最少,而SMTS-MTO组形成等效班级的参与者人数最多。在较年轻的成年人中,掌握标准的试验差异很小,各组之间的等效性测试没有差异。老年人对比较刺激的反应时间高于年轻人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Matching-to-sample performance in older and younger adults
ABSTRACT The present experiment studied the influence of simultaneous matching-to-sample (SMTS) or delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS 0 s) using the many-to-one (MTO) or one-to-many (OTM) training structures on the formation of equivalence classes in older and younger adults. Sixty older adults and 16 younger adults were divided into four groups: (1) SMTS-MTO, (2) SMTS-OTM, (3) DMTS 0 s-MTO, and (4) DMTS 0 s-OTM. All of the younger adults established conditional discriminations, whereas only 35 of the 60 older adults did the same. The SMTS-OTM had the lowest number of trials to mastery criterion for the older adults, and the SMTS-MTO group had the highest number of participants forming equivalence classes. In the younger adults, the differences in trials to mastery criterion were minimal, and there were no differences in the equivalence tests across groups. The older adults had a higher reaction time to comparison stimuli than the younger adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Behavior Analysis
European Journal of Behavior Analysis Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Examining implicit and explicit anti-Black racial bias in children: A repeated measure design using the Function Acquisition Speed Test (FAST) Where engagement happens: Parent perspectives on engagement in behavioural interventions Gather ‘round and listen close: Increasing responding to voices in children with autism Comparing the stimulus-pairing yes/no procedure to match-to-sample to establish equivalence classes with adults Geographic affiliation of authors and cooperative research in the Mexican , European , and Brazilian journal of behavior analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1