固定床吸附水污染物:一个警告指南,简单的分析模型和建模误解

K. Chu
{"title":"固定床吸附水污染物:一个警告指南,简单的分析模型和建模误解","authors":"K. Chu","doi":"10.1080/15422119.2022.2039196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This contribution is intended as a specific review of the modeling approaches used to describe breakthrough curves of water contaminants and as a cautionary guide to some common and persistent modeling misconceptions. Its intended audience is early career researchers working in the area of adsorptive water remediation. First, typical data- and mechanism-driven models are discussed. A brief description of numerical fixed bed models with multiple curve broadening mechanisms (axial dispersion; intraparticle diffusion; film mass transfer; reaction kinetics) is presented. Particular attention is paid to analytical fixed bed models constructed for linear and nonlinear trace systems. Because these models assume that a single curve broadening mechanism is operative, their functional forms are relatively simple. Examples of spreadsheet calculations with these models are provided. A summary describing several egregious misconceptions associated with the use of two phenomenological models based on reaction kinetics (Bohart–Adams and Thomas) and one empirical model (Yoon–Nelson) to fit breakthrough curves is presented. In many previous studies, the three models have been used blindly, resulting in meaningless findings. The author hopes that this article will help the early career researcher avoid repeating the same mistakes.","PeriodicalId":21744,"journal":{"name":"Separation & Purification Reviews","volume":"36 1","pages":"75 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fixed Bed Adsorption of Water Contaminants: A Cautionary Guide to Simple Analytical Models and Modeling Misconceptions\",\"authors\":\"K. Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15422119.2022.2039196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This contribution is intended as a specific review of the modeling approaches used to describe breakthrough curves of water contaminants and as a cautionary guide to some common and persistent modeling misconceptions. Its intended audience is early career researchers working in the area of adsorptive water remediation. First, typical data- and mechanism-driven models are discussed. A brief description of numerical fixed bed models with multiple curve broadening mechanisms (axial dispersion; intraparticle diffusion; film mass transfer; reaction kinetics) is presented. Particular attention is paid to analytical fixed bed models constructed for linear and nonlinear trace systems. Because these models assume that a single curve broadening mechanism is operative, their functional forms are relatively simple. Examples of spreadsheet calculations with these models are provided. A summary describing several egregious misconceptions associated with the use of two phenomenological models based on reaction kinetics (Bohart–Adams and Thomas) and one empirical model (Yoon–Nelson) to fit breakthrough curves is presented. In many previous studies, the three models have been used blindly, resulting in meaningless findings. The author hopes that this article will help the early career researcher avoid repeating the same mistakes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Separation & Purification Reviews\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"75 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Separation & Purification Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15422119.2022.2039196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation & Purification Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15422119.2022.2039196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

这一贡献旨在作为用于描述水污染物突破曲线的建模方法的具体回顾,并作为一些常见和持久的建模误解的警示指南。它的目标受众是在吸附水修复领域工作的早期职业研究人员。首先,讨论了典型的数据和机制驱动模型。具有多种曲线展宽机制的数值固定床模型(轴向弥散;intraparticle扩散;膜传质;反应动力学)。特别注意对线性和非线性轨迹系统建立的解析固定床模型。由于这些模型假设单一的曲线展宽机制是有效的,所以它们的函数形式相对简单。提供了使用这些模型进行电子表格计算的示例。摘要描述了与使用基于反应动力学的两个现象学模型(Bohart-Adams和Thomas)和一个经验模型(Yoon-Nelson)来拟合突破曲线相关的几个令人震惊的误解。在之前的许多研究中,这三种模型被盲目使用,导致研究结果毫无意义。作者希望本文能帮助初入职场的研究者避免重蹈覆辙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fixed Bed Adsorption of Water Contaminants: A Cautionary Guide to Simple Analytical Models and Modeling Misconceptions
ABSTRACT This contribution is intended as a specific review of the modeling approaches used to describe breakthrough curves of water contaminants and as a cautionary guide to some common and persistent modeling misconceptions. Its intended audience is early career researchers working in the area of adsorptive water remediation. First, typical data- and mechanism-driven models are discussed. A brief description of numerical fixed bed models with multiple curve broadening mechanisms (axial dispersion; intraparticle diffusion; film mass transfer; reaction kinetics) is presented. Particular attention is paid to analytical fixed bed models constructed for linear and nonlinear trace systems. Because these models assume that a single curve broadening mechanism is operative, their functional forms are relatively simple. Examples of spreadsheet calculations with these models are provided. A summary describing several egregious misconceptions associated with the use of two phenomenological models based on reaction kinetics (Bohart–Adams and Thomas) and one empirical model (Yoon–Nelson) to fit breakthrough curves is presented. In many previous studies, the three models have been used blindly, resulting in meaningless findings. The author hopes that this article will help the early career researcher avoid repeating the same mistakes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Latest Development of Matrix Solid Phase Dispersion Extraction and Microextraction for Natural Products from 2015-2021 Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Hydrometallurgical Methods Separation of Plutonium from Other Actinides and Fission Products in Ionic Liquid Medium Fixed Bed Adsorption of Water Contaminants: A Cautionary Guide to Simple Analytical Models and Modeling Misconceptions Application of Aqueous Biphasic Systems Extraction in Various Biomolecules Separation and Purification: Advancements Brought by Quaternary Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1