灌氮管理对旱作水稻水分生产力和养分吸收的影响

S. Duary, K. Pramanik, Debasish Panda
{"title":"灌氮管理对旱作水稻水分生产力和养分吸收的影响","authors":"S. Duary, K. Pramanik, Debasish Panda","doi":"10.35709/ory.2022.59.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water and nitrogen fertilizer are the two important inputs for rice cultivation. A field experiment was carried out in split plot design, with three water management treatments, irrigation at (i) 75 % Cumulative Pan Evaporation (CPE), (ii) 100% CPE, (iii) 125% CPE in the main plot, and four nitrogen management strategies, (i) 100% nitrogen applied through chemical fertiliser, (ii) 75% through chemical fertiliser + 2.5 t ha-1 vermicompost, (iii) 50% through chemical fertiliser + 5.0 t ha-1 vermicompost, and (iv) 25% through chemical fertiliser +7.5 t ha-1vermicompost in subplot. The grain yield, straw yield, water productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of aerobic rice were considerably affected by irrigation and nitrogen management. Crops receiving irrigation at 125% CPE had the highest grain yield (3618 kg ha-1), which was comparable to crops receiving irrigation at 100 % CPE. Regardless of irrigation and nitrogen management, the straw yield of aerobic rice ranged from 4127 to 5092 kg ha-1. The highest total NPK uptake by grain was recorded with nitrogen at 100 % N through fertiliser (N1), which was significantly greater than what was obtained from other nitrogen treatments and irrigation management at 100 % CPE (I100) and 125 % CPE (I125) was significantly better than irrigation at 75 % CPE (I75). Irrigation management at 125 % CPE yielded the highest gross return, net return, and B: C ratio of aerobic rice, which was comparable to 100 % CPE and 100 % N through fertiliser, 75 % N through fertiliser + 2.5 t ha-1 vermicompost, and significantly higher than other nitrogen treatments.","PeriodicalId":19618,"journal":{"name":"ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of irrigation and nitrogen management on water productivity and nutrient uptake of aerobic rice\",\"authors\":\"S. Duary, K. Pramanik, Debasish Panda\",\"doi\":\"10.35709/ory.2022.59.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Water and nitrogen fertilizer are the two important inputs for rice cultivation. A field experiment was carried out in split plot design, with three water management treatments, irrigation at (i) 75 % Cumulative Pan Evaporation (CPE), (ii) 100% CPE, (iii) 125% CPE in the main plot, and four nitrogen management strategies, (i) 100% nitrogen applied through chemical fertiliser, (ii) 75% through chemical fertiliser + 2.5 t ha-1 vermicompost, (iii) 50% through chemical fertiliser + 5.0 t ha-1 vermicompost, and (iv) 25% through chemical fertiliser +7.5 t ha-1vermicompost in subplot. The grain yield, straw yield, water productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of aerobic rice were considerably affected by irrigation and nitrogen management. Crops receiving irrigation at 125% CPE had the highest grain yield (3618 kg ha-1), which was comparable to crops receiving irrigation at 100 % CPE. Regardless of irrigation and nitrogen management, the straw yield of aerobic rice ranged from 4127 to 5092 kg ha-1. The highest total NPK uptake by grain was recorded with nitrogen at 100 % N through fertiliser (N1), which was significantly greater than what was obtained from other nitrogen treatments and irrigation management at 100 % CPE (I100) and 125 % CPE (I125) was significantly better than irrigation at 75 % CPE (I75). Irrigation management at 125 % CPE yielded the highest gross return, net return, and B: C ratio of aerobic rice, which was comparable to 100 % CPE and 100 % N through fertiliser, 75 % N through fertiliser + 2.5 t ha-1 vermicompost, and significantly higher than other nitrogen treatments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35709/ory.2022.59.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35709/ory.2022.59.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

水肥和氮肥是水稻栽培的两大重要投入品。采用分地块设计进行田间试验,采用3种水分管理处理,分别在主地块以(i) 75%累积蒸发皿蒸发量(CPE)、(ii) 100%累积蒸发量(CPE)、(iii) 125%累积蒸发量(CPE)灌溉,以及4种氮肥管理策略,即(i) 100%施氮于化肥,(ii) 75%施于化肥+ 2.5 t ha-1蚯蚓堆肥,(iii) 50%施于化肥+ 5.0 t ha-1蚯蚓堆肥,(iv) 25%施用化肥+7.5 t ha- 1蚯蚓堆肥。灌溉和氮肥管理对旱作水稻的籽粒产量、秸秆产量、水分生产力、养分吸收和经济效益均有显著影响。以125% CPE灌溉的作物籽粒产量最高(3618 kg hm -1),与以100% CPE灌溉的作物相当。在不考虑灌溉和氮肥管理的情况下,旱作水稻秸秆产量在4127 ~ 5092 kg hm -1之间。100%氮肥处理(N1)的籽粒氮磷钾总吸收量最高,显著高于其他氮肥处理,100% CPE (I100)和125% CPE (I125)的灌溉管理显著优于75% CPE (I75)。125% CPE的灌溉处理产生的好氧水稻的总收益、净收益和B: C比最高,与100% CPE + 100%氮肥、75%氮肥+ 2.5 t hm -1蚯蚓堆肥相当,显著高于其他施氮处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of irrigation and nitrogen management on water productivity and nutrient uptake of aerobic rice
Water and nitrogen fertilizer are the two important inputs for rice cultivation. A field experiment was carried out in split plot design, with three water management treatments, irrigation at (i) 75 % Cumulative Pan Evaporation (CPE), (ii) 100% CPE, (iii) 125% CPE in the main plot, and four nitrogen management strategies, (i) 100% nitrogen applied through chemical fertiliser, (ii) 75% through chemical fertiliser + 2.5 t ha-1 vermicompost, (iii) 50% through chemical fertiliser + 5.0 t ha-1 vermicompost, and (iv) 25% through chemical fertiliser +7.5 t ha-1vermicompost in subplot. The grain yield, straw yield, water productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of aerobic rice were considerably affected by irrigation and nitrogen management. Crops receiving irrigation at 125% CPE had the highest grain yield (3618 kg ha-1), which was comparable to crops receiving irrigation at 100 % CPE. Regardless of irrigation and nitrogen management, the straw yield of aerobic rice ranged from 4127 to 5092 kg ha-1. The highest total NPK uptake by grain was recorded with nitrogen at 100 % N through fertiliser (N1), which was significantly greater than what was obtained from other nitrogen treatments and irrigation management at 100 % CPE (I100) and 125 % CPE (I125) was significantly better than irrigation at 75 % CPE (I75). Irrigation management at 125 % CPE yielded the highest gross return, net return, and B: C ratio of aerobic rice, which was comparable to 100 % CPE and 100 % N through fertiliser, 75 % N through fertiliser + 2.5 t ha-1 vermicompost, and significantly higher than other nitrogen treatments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity and resistance levels of phosphine against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and Sitophilus oryzae (L.) populations Severity and distribution of bacterial leaf blight of rice in different rice growing ecosystems of Karnataka state of India Morpho-genetic characterization of black-husked small-grain aromatic rice landrace Kalojira of West Bengal Effect of prohexadione-calcium onphotosynthetic and yield parameters in basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.) against lodging stress Use of plant essential oils for the management of sheath blight disease in rice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1