砂面与螺纹光滑Gfrp筋的粘结性能

Antony Kodsy
{"title":"砂面与螺纹光滑Gfrp筋的粘结性能","authors":"Antony Kodsy","doi":"10.19080/cerj.2019.08.555743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Steel Reinforcement corrosion has been reported to be a major contributor in the deterioration of concrete structures. The use of FRP bars as reinforcement in concrete structures has proven to provide an effective solution for this durability issue [1]. The physical and mechanical properties and surface shape of GFRP bars are significantly different from steel bars. This difference cause GFRP bars to have lower bonding properties with concrete than steel bars causing bond performance to be a major concern when designing GFRP reinforced concrete elements [2]. Several pullout tests have been done to evaluate bond strength of FRP bars which is a major factor in estimating development length [3-5]. The ACI 440.1R-15 [3] defines development length as the embedment in concrete required to transfer the force in the bar through bond (equation 10.1a). The used GFRP bars in this study had a guaranteed tensile strength (mean tensile strength of test specimens minus three times standard deviation [3] of 121 ksi (834 MPa). This value falls within the range of the ACI 440.1R-15 GFRP bar tensile strength values of 70 to 230 ksi (483 to 690 MPa). Discussion and Results","PeriodicalId":30320,"journal":{"name":"Constructii Journal of Civil Engineering Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond Performance of Sanded Surface and Threaded Smooth Gfrp Bars\",\"authors\":\"Antony Kodsy\",\"doi\":\"10.19080/cerj.2019.08.555743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Steel Reinforcement corrosion has been reported to be a major contributor in the deterioration of concrete structures. The use of FRP bars as reinforcement in concrete structures has proven to provide an effective solution for this durability issue [1]. The physical and mechanical properties and surface shape of GFRP bars are significantly different from steel bars. This difference cause GFRP bars to have lower bonding properties with concrete than steel bars causing bond performance to be a major concern when designing GFRP reinforced concrete elements [2]. Several pullout tests have been done to evaluate bond strength of FRP bars which is a major factor in estimating development length [3-5]. The ACI 440.1R-15 [3] defines development length as the embedment in concrete required to transfer the force in the bar through bond (equation 10.1a). The used GFRP bars in this study had a guaranteed tensile strength (mean tensile strength of test specimens minus three times standard deviation [3] of 121 ksi (834 MPa). This value falls within the range of the ACI 440.1R-15 GFRP bar tensile strength values of 70 to 230 ksi (483 to 690 MPa). Discussion and Results\",\"PeriodicalId\":30320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constructii Journal of Civil Engineering Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constructii Journal of Civil Engineering Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19080/cerj.2019.08.555743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constructii Journal of Civil Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/cerj.2019.08.555743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,钢筋腐蚀是混凝土结构恶化的主要原因。在混凝土结构中使用FRP筋作为钢筋已被证明是解决这一耐久性问题的有效方法[1]。GFRP筋的物理力学性能和表面形状与钢筋有明显的不同。这种差异导致GFRP筋与混凝土的粘结性能低于钢筋,因此在设计GFRP筋混凝土构件时,粘结性能是一个主要问题[2]。为了评估FRP筋的粘结强度,已经进行了几次拉拔试验,这是估算开发长度的主要因素[3-5]。ACI 440.1R-15[3]将发展长度定义为通过粘结传递杆内力所需的混凝土嵌入长度(式10.1a)。本研究使用的GFRP筋具有保证抗拉强度(试件平均抗拉强度减去3倍标准差[3]121 ksi (834 MPa))。该值落在ACI 440.1R-15 GFRP筋抗拉强度值70 ~ 230 ksi (483 ~ 690 MPa)的范围内。讨论与结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bond Performance of Sanded Surface and Threaded Smooth Gfrp Bars
Steel Reinforcement corrosion has been reported to be a major contributor in the deterioration of concrete structures. The use of FRP bars as reinforcement in concrete structures has proven to provide an effective solution for this durability issue [1]. The physical and mechanical properties and surface shape of GFRP bars are significantly different from steel bars. This difference cause GFRP bars to have lower bonding properties with concrete than steel bars causing bond performance to be a major concern when designing GFRP reinforced concrete elements [2]. Several pullout tests have been done to evaluate bond strength of FRP bars which is a major factor in estimating development length [3-5]. The ACI 440.1R-15 [3] defines development length as the embedment in concrete required to transfer the force in the bar through bond (equation 10.1a). The used GFRP bars in this study had a guaranteed tensile strength (mean tensile strength of test specimens minus three times standard deviation [3] of 121 ksi (834 MPa). This value falls within the range of the ACI 440.1R-15 GFRP bar tensile strength values of 70 to 230 ksi (483 to 690 MPa). Discussion and Results
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Abductive Method to Generate Polymath Knowledge in Technical-Scientific Production Trends in the Addition of PET and Natural Fibers to the Concrete- Steel Reinforcement System Psychometric Properties of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Prevalence of Alcohol use Among SA Site-based Construction Workers Security & Happiness by Design for Happiness Initiated Behavioural Lead Intelligence Security System (HIBLISS) Groundwater Level Estimation for Slope Stability Analysis of a Coal Open Pit Mine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1