约翰内斯堡证券交易所上市公司在使用Twitter时采用的印象管理技术

Naledi Nkhi, Zakiyyah Varachia, Dannielle Cerbone
{"title":"约翰内斯堡证券交易所上市公司在使用Twitter时采用的印象管理技术","authors":"Naledi Nkhi, Zakiyyah Varachia, Dannielle Cerbone","doi":"10.36615/jcssa.v40i2.1314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study investigates if companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) use impression management techniques when disclosing earnings-related information on Twitter. A content analysis was followed as a research methodology to conduct the study. The findings indicate that Twitter is not widely used by listed companies to disclose earnings information. However, where Twitter is used, companies do employ impression management techniques. The impression management techniques differ depending on whether the earnings information distributed is positive or negative. This was evident as tweets with a positive tone were circulated much more than tweets with a negative or neutral tone. The use of self-presentational and dissemination patterns also differed significantly across the tone of tweets. Positive tweets contained more narratives compared to negative tweets, indicating that negative information is concealed. Negative tweets predominantly did not contain hashtags, once again indicating that companies often conceal negative information. Most positive and neutral tweets contained hashtags, illustrating that companies often use Twitteras a means to alter users’ perceptions towards a positive image. Understanding how companies use impression management techniques will assist users in interpreting and using the information shared. The research may also be beneficial to regulators who may consider drafting guidance and standards regarding the use of social media by companies.","PeriodicalId":51949,"journal":{"name":"Communicare-Journal for Communication Sciences in Southern Africa","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impression management techniques employed by listed companies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange when using Twitter\",\"authors\":\"Naledi Nkhi, Zakiyyah Varachia, Dannielle Cerbone\",\"doi\":\"10.36615/jcssa.v40i2.1314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study investigates if companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) use impression management techniques when disclosing earnings-related information on Twitter. A content analysis was followed as a research methodology to conduct the study. The findings indicate that Twitter is not widely used by listed companies to disclose earnings information. However, where Twitter is used, companies do employ impression management techniques. The impression management techniques differ depending on whether the earnings information distributed is positive or negative. This was evident as tweets with a positive tone were circulated much more than tweets with a negative or neutral tone. The use of self-presentational and dissemination patterns also differed significantly across the tone of tweets. Positive tweets contained more narratives compared to negative tweets, indicating that negative information is concealed. Negative tweets predominantly did not contain hashtags, once again indicating that companies often conceal negative information. Most positive and neutral tweets contained hashtags, illustrating that companies often use Twitteras a means to alter users’ perceptions towards a positive image. Understanding how companies use impression management techniques will assist users in interpreting and using the information shared. The research may also be beneficial to regulators who may consider drafting guidance and standards regarding the use of social media by companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communicare-Journal for Communication Sciences in Southern Africa\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communicare-Journal for Communication Sciences in Southern Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36615/jcssa.v40i2.1314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicare-Journal for Communication Sciences in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36615/jcssa.v40i2.1314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项研究调查了在约翰内斯堡证券交易所(JSE)上市的公司在Twitter上披露收益相关信息时是否使用了印象管理技术。采用内容分析作为研究方法进行研究。研究结果表明,Twitter并未被上市公司广泛用于披露收益信息。然而,在使用Twitter的地方,公司确实采用了印象管理技术。印象管理技术的不同取决于所发布的收益信息是正面的还是负面的。这一点很明显,因为带有积极语气的推文比带有消极或中性语气的推文传播得更多。自我呈现和传播模式的使用也因推文的语气而有显著差异。与负面推文相比,积极推文包含了更多的叙述,表明负面信息被隐藏了。负面推文主要不包含标签,这再次表明公司经常隐瞒负面信息。大多数积极和中立的推文都包含标签,这表明公司经常利用推特来改变用户对积极形象的看法。了解公司如何使用印象管理技术将有助于用户解释和使用共享的信息。这项研究也可能有利于监管机构,他们可能会考虑起草有关公司使用社交媒体的指导和标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impression management techniques employed by listed companies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange when using Twitter
The study investigates if companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) use impression management techniques when disclosing earnings-related information on Twitter. A content analysis was followed as a research methodology to conduct the study. The findings indicate that Twitter is not widely used by listed companies to disclose earnings information. However, where Twitter is used, companies do employ impression management techniques. The impression management techniques differ depending on whether the earnings information distributed is positive or negative. This was evident as tweets with a positive tone were circulated much more than tweets with a negative or neutral tone. The use of self-presentational and dissemination patterns also differed significantly across the tone of tweets. Positive tweets contained more narratives compared to negative tweets, indicating that negative information is concealed. Negative tweets predominantly did not contain hashtags, once again indicating that companies often conceal negative information. Most positive and neutral tweets contained hashtags, illustrating that companies often use Twitteras a means to alter users’ perceptions towards a positive image. Understanding how companies use impression management techniques will assist users in interpreting and using the information shared. The research may also be beneficial to regulators who may consider drafting guidance and standards regarding the use of social media by companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI PENYULUH AGAMA HINDU DI ERA TRASFORMASI DIGITAL GAMBELAN SARON SEBAGAI MEDIA KOMUNIKASI SOSIAL DI DESA ADAT TUMBAKBAYUH MENGWI BADUNG Organisational factors as determinants for online knowledge-sharing behaviour (Re-)Positioning and recognising the influence of internal communication on employee engagement for maximum organisational performance Educators' perceptions on the benefits and barriers of oral PrEP uptake among adolescent girls and young women in Vulindlela, KwaZulu-Natal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1