菲律宾学者跨学科的第二语言学术研究写作的句法复杂程度如何?

Q3 Arts and Humanities Language Related Research Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.52547/lrr.13.5.3
H. Hernandez
{"title":"菲律宾学者跨学科的第二语言学术研究写作的句法复杂程度如何?","authors":"H. Hernandez","doi":"10.52547/lrr.13.5.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Syntactic complexity has received much attention in English for academic purposes (EAP) research. However, it remains an ignored area of EAP research in the Philippines. This study cross-examined syntactic complexity in research articles (RAs) authored by Filipino researchers (FRs) in Communication, Curriculum and Instruction, and Psychology. Major findings revealed that attributive adjectives, nominal prepositional phrases, and noun premodifiers most dominantly co-occurred across disciplinary RAs. A significant difference exists between the three nominal pre- and postmodifiers and other compressed and implicit and elaborated and explicit syntactic features. As such, Filipino-authored disciplinary RAs are characterized by a compressed and implicit discourse style. Therefore, L2 academic research writing by FRs regardless of the disciplines is syntactically complex with the use of the three compressed and implicit phrasal features. It is likewise filled with very dense packaging of information by the three nominal phrases. The study has practical implications for academic research writing instruction, academic research journals, and professional development training.","PeriodicalId":53465,"journal":{"name":"Language Related Research","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Syntactically Complex is L2 Academic Research Writing by Filipino Researchers across Disciplines?\",\"authors\":\"H. Hernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/lrr.13.5.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Syntactic complexity has received much attention in English for academic purposes (EAP) research. However, it remains an ignored area of EAP research in the Philippines. This study cross-examined syntactic complexity in research articles (RAs) authored by Filipino researchers (FRs) in Communication, Curriculum and Instruction, and Psychology. Major findings revealed that attributive adjectives, nominal prepositional phrases, and noun premodifiers most dominantly co-occurred across disciplinary RAs. A significant difference exists between the three nominal pre- and postmodifiers and other compressed and implicit and elaborated and explicit syntactic features. As such, Filipino-authored disciplinary RAs are characterized by a compressed and implicit discourse style. Therefore, L2 academic research writing by FRs regardless of the disciplines is syntactically complex with the use of the three compressed and implicit phrasal features. It is likewise filled with very dense packaging of information by the three nominal phrases. The study has practical implications for academic research writing instruction, academic research journals, and professional development training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Related Research\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/lrr.13.5.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/lrr.13.5.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语法复杂性在学术英语研究中受到了广泛的关注。然而,它仍然是菲律宾EAP研究中一个被忽视的领域。本研究对菲律宾研究人员在《传播学》、《课程与教学》、《心理学》等领域的研究论文的句法复杂性进行了交叉检验。研究发现,定语形容词、名词性介词短语和名词前置词在学科间共同出现的比例最高。三种名词性前、后修饰语与其他压缩与隐式、阐述与明示的句法特征存在显著差异。因此,菲律宾撰写的学科RAs的特点是压缩和含蓄的话语风格。因此,无论哪个学科的FRs的第二语言学术研究写作都是句法复杂的,使用了三个压缩和隐含的短语特征。它同样充满了非常密集的信息包装的三个名义短语。本研究对学术研究写作指导、学术研究期刊及专业发展训练均有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Syntactically Complex is L2 Academic Research Writing by Filipino Researchers across Disciplines?
Syntactic complexity has received much attention in English for academic purposes (EAP) research. However, it remains an ignored area of EAP research in the Philippines. This study cross-examined syntactic complexity in research articles (RAs) authored by Filipino researchers (FRs) in Communication, Curriculum and Instruction, and Psychology. Major findings revealed that attributive adjectives, nominal prepositional phrases, and noun premodifiers most dominantly co-occurred across disciplinary RAs. A significant difference exists between the three nominal pre- and postmodifiers and other compressed and implicit and elaborated and explicit syntactic features. As such, Filipino-authored disciplinary RAs are characterized by a compressed and implicit discourse style. Therefore, L2 academic research writing by FRs regardless of the disciplines is syntactically complex with the use of the three compressed and implicit phrasal features. It is likewise filled with very dense packaging of information by the three nominal phrases. The study has practical implications for academic research writing instruction, academic research journals, and professional development training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Related Research
Language Related Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Language Related Research is a platform to develop scientific thought in the specific fields of language sciences, enunciation and discourse. Accordingly, Language Related Research journal welcomes the original articles with theoretical, analytical and field work backgrounds. The Journal highly recommends the scholars avoid clichés and tautology with special focus on the diversity in the field of theorizing and applied background of language, corpus based studies and reference to the main domestic and international research. In the own field of theorizing and mindfulness however, issue-driven analysis based on original hypothesis, field works with quantitative and applied domain have the scientific priority for the journal.
期刊最新文献
Word-initial Voicing Contrast in Khuzestani Arabic Stops Developing and Validating a Questionnaire on EFL Teachers’ Beliefs about Task-based Language Teaching (TBLT) L2 Grit and Foreign Language Enjoyment: Arguments in Light of Control-Value Theory and Its Methodological Compatibility Revisiting Research on Positive Psychology in Second and Foreign Language Education: Trends and Directions The Effect of Topic on EFL Writing by Vietnamese Tertiary Students: Insights from Combining a Lexical Richness Analysis with Student Self-Reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1