{"title":"作为抵抗的怪物:重新思考超越错误身体修辞的跨化身","authors":"C. Nirta","doi":"10.1080/14735784.2022.2084130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While the production of monsters through political and cultural discourses has never been as dominant as in recent years, the method through which this phenomenon is framed often remains engulfed in comparative essentialism reducing monsters to acts of transgression, with the inevitable result of articulating monstrosity as mere construction of the other. Such othered identity deprives monsters of reality, of their ontology, and confines them in a space of not-being, always defined through what they are not. This article challenges the idea of monstrosity as categorical transgression and uses the narrative of the ‘wrong body’ commonly associated with trans embodiment as a conceptual framework to argue for an ontology of monstrosity.","PeriodicalId":43943,"journal":{"name":"Culture Theory and Critique","volume":"50 1","pages":"339 - 352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monstrosity as resistance: rethinking trans embodiment beyond the rhetoric of the wrong body\",\"authors\":\"C. Nirta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14735784.2022.2084130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT While the production of monsters through political and cultural discourses has never been as dominant as in recent years, the method through which this phenomenon is framed often remains engulfed in comparative essentialism reducing monsters to acts of transgression, with the inevitable result of articulating monstrosity as mere construction of the other. Such othered identity deprives monsters of reality, of their ontology, and confines them in a space of not-being, always defined through what they are not. This article challenges the idea of monstrosity as categorical transgression and uses the narrative of the ‘wrong body’ commonly associated with trans embodiment as a conceptual framework to argue for an ontology of monstrosity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture Theory and Critique\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"339 - 352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture Theory and Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2022.2084130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Theory and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2022.2084130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Monstrosity as resistance: rethinking trans embodiment beyond the rhetoric of the wrong body
ABSTRACT While the production of monsters through political and cultural discourses has never been as dominant as in recent years, the method through which this phenomenon is framed often remains engulfed in comparative essentialism reducing monsters to acts of transgression, with the inevitable result of articulating monstrosity as mere construction of the other. Such othered identity deprives monsters of reality, of their ontology, and confines them in a space of not-being, always defined through what they are not. This article challenges the idea of monstrosity as categorical transgression and uses the narrative of the ‘wrong body’ commonly associated with trans embodiment as a conceptual framework to argue for an ontology of monstrosity.