英国脱欧与优惠贸易协定:终止条款与生存条款问题

Eirini Kikarea
{"title":"英国脱欧与优惠贸易协定:终止条款与生存条款问题","authors":"Eirini Kikarea","doi":"10.54648/leie2019004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the fate of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) concluded between the United Kingdom (UK), the European Union (EU) and third States after Brexit. It examines EU-only and mixed PTAs separately. Regarding mixed PTAs, it is argued that Brexit will not lead to their automatic termination. The UK will possess all rights and obligations under these agreements, unless they contain provisions limiting their scope, such as respective powers and territorial application clauses, often found in bilateral mixed PTAs. The effect of the former is that the UK will remain Party to mixed PTAs but will not fall within the personal scope of rights and obligations thereunder. This situation gives rise to a series of questions, among others, whether the UK will be able to terminate the treaties and whether survival clauses will be triggered. It is argued that the UK will be able to rely on PTAs’ termination provisions and potentially Article 62 VCLT (fundamental change in circumstances), and that survival clauses are also triggered by permanent de facto termination events. Regarding EU-only treaties, it is argued the UK will be neither bound thereby under international law nor obliged to act in conformity with them under European law.","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brexit and Preferential Trade Agreements: Issues of Termination and Survival Clauses\",\"authors\":\"Eirini Kikarea\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/leie2019004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the fate of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) concluded between the United Kingdom (UK), the European Union (EU) and third States after Brexit. It examines EU-only and mixed PTAs separately. Regarding mixed PTAs, it is argued that Brexit will not lead to their automatic termination. The UK will possess all rights and obligations under these agreements, unless they contain provisions limiting their scope, such as respective powers and territorial application clauses, often found in bilateral mixed PTAs. The effect of the former is that the UK will remain Party to mixed PTAs but will not fall within the personal scope of rights and obligations thereunder. This situation gives rise to a series of questions, among others, whether the UK will be able to terminate the treaties and whether survival clauses will be triggered. It is argued that the UK will be able to rely on PTAs’ termination provisions and potentially Article 62 VCLT (fundamental change in circumstances), and that survival clauses are also triggered by permanent de facto termination events. Regarding EU-only treaties, it is argued the UK will be neither bound thereby under international law nor obliged to act in conformity with them under European law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2019004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2019004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考察了英国(UK)、欧盟(EU)和第三国在英国脱欧后达成的优惠贸易协定(pta)的命运。它分别考察了欧盟贸易协定和混合贸易协定。对于混合pta,有人认为英国脱欧不会导致其自动终止。英国将拥有这些协议下的所有权利和义务,除非它们包含限制其范围的条款,例如双边混合自由贸易协定中经常出现的各自权力和领土适用条款。前者的影响是,英国仍将是混合贸易协定的缔约方,但不属于该协定项下个人权利和义务的范围。这种情况引发了一系列问题,其中包括英国是否能够终止条约以及是否会触发生存条款。有人认为,英国将能够依赖pta的终止条款和潜在的第62条VCLT(情况的根本变化),并且生存条款也由永久性事实上的终止事件触发。关于欧盟条约,有人认为英国既不受国际法约束,也没有义务按照欧洲法律行事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brexit and Preferential Trade Agreements: Issues of Termination and Survival Clauses
This article examines the fate of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) concluded between the United Kingdom (UK), the European Union (EU) and third States after Brexit. It examines EU-only and mixed PTAs separately. Regarding mixed PTAs, it is argued that Brexit will not lead to their automatic termination. The UK will possess all rights and obligations under these agreements, unless they contain provisions limiting their scope, such as respective powers and territorial application clauses, often found in bilateral mixed PTAs. The effect of the former is that the UK will remain Party to mixed PTAs but will not fall within the personal scope of rights and obligations thereunder. This situation gives rise to a series of questions, among others, whether the UK will be able to terminate the treaties and whether survival clauses will be triggered. It is argued that the UK will be able to rely on PTAs’ termination provisions and potentially Article 62 VCLT (fundamental change in circumstances), and that survival clauses are also triggered by permanent de facto termination events. Regarding EU-only treaties, it is argued the UK will be neither bound thereby under international law nor obliged to act in conformity with them under European law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The EU’s Anti-coercion Instrument: A Return of Unlawful Unilateral Trade Countermeasures in Disguise? Editorial: Investment Protection in an Integrated Europe – The Non-Enforcement of Intra-EU Investment Arbitration Awards as the Ultimate Test Case for Strasbourg’s Deference Doctrines Why Do (High-Income) Countries Wish to Green Their Trade Agreements? The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment The ESM Reform and Its Missing Legitimacy in Non-Euro Area Member States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1