评估下颌骨骨折类型和治疗方法:一项单中心回顾性研究

C. Asan, Emil Mursalov, A. Demirba, E. Soylu, S. Bilge, C. Topan, Y. Kaba, A. Alkan
{"title":"评估下颌骨骨折类型和治疗方法:一项单中心回顾性研究","authors":"C. Asan, Emil Mursalov, A. Demirba, E. Soylu, S. Bilge, C. Topan, Y. Kaba, A. Alkan","doi":"10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.05.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Mandible fractures are among the most common bone fractures in the maxillofacial region. Correct and early treatment is important in mandible fractures. The aim of this study is to retrospectively examine and analyze the patterns and treatment methods of mandibular fractures seen in patients admitted with trauma. Methods: Patients treated for mandible fractures between 2006- 2021 years were included in this retrospective study. The files and archive records of the patients were scanned retrospectively. Demographic, clinical and radiological data were recorded. The treatment methods of the patients included in the study were evaluated. Results: 176 patients with a total of 246 fractures were included to the study. Simple fractures were found in 130 patients, green tree fractures in 12 patients, and comminuted fractures in 34 patients. There were 147 un-favorable and 29 favorable fractures in total. Fall was found to be the most common etiologic cause in all gender and age groups (n=55, 31.2%). Angle fracture was observed most frequently in single fracture cases, while condyle fracture was the most common accompanying fracture type in multiple fractures. 88 patients were treated with the open and, 56 with the closed approach, and 32 with both the open and closed approach. Conclusion: Fracture type and etiologic cause are closely related with the type of the fracture. Mandible fractures should be carefully examined and the most appropriate treatment for the type of fracture should be applied as soon as possible.","PeriodicalId":8248,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medical Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF MANDIBULAR FRACTURE PATTERNS AND TREATMENT METHODS: A SINGLE CENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY\",\"authors\":\"C. Asan, Emil Mursalov, A. Demirba, E. Soylu, S. Bilge, C. Topan, Y. Kaba, A. Alkan\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.05.120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Mandible fractures are among the most common bone fractures in the maxillofacial region. Correct and early treatment is important in mandible fractures. The aim of this study is to retrospectively examine and analyze the patterns and treatment methods of mandibular fractures seen in patients admitted with trauma. Methods: Patients treated for mandible fractures between 2006- 2021 years were included in this retrospective study. The files and archive records of the patients were scanned retrospectively. Demographic, clinical and radiological data were recorded. The treatment methods of the patients included in the study were evaluated. Results: 176 patients with a total of 246 fractures were included to the study. Simple fractures were found in 130 patients, green tree fractures in 12 patients, and comminuted fractures in 34 patients. There were 147 un-favorable and 29 favorable fractures in total. Fall was found to be the most common etiologic cause in all gender and age groups (n=55, 31.2%). Angle fracture was observed most frequently in single fracture cases, while condyle fracture was the most common accompanying fracture type in multiple fractures. 88 patients were treated with the open and, 56 with the closed approach, and 32 with both the open and closed approach. Conclusion: Fracture type and etiologic cause are closely related with the type of the fracture. Mandible fractures should be carefully examined and the most appropriate treatment for the type of fracture should be applied as soon as possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.05.120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.05.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:下颌骨骨折是颌面部最常见的骨折之一。正确的早期治疗对下颌骨骨折至关重要。本研究的目的是回顾性研究和分析创伤患者下颌骨骨折的模式和治疗方法。方法:2006- 2021年间接受下颌骨骨折治疗的患者纳入本回顾性研究。对患者的档案和档案记录进行回顾性扫描。记录了人口统计学、临床和放射学数据。对纳入研究的患者的治疗方法进行评价。结果:176例患者共246例骨折纳入研究。单纯性骨折130例,青树性骨折12例,粉碎性骨折34例。不良骨折147例,有利骨折29例。跌倒是所有性别和年龄组中最常见的病因(n=55, 31.2%)。单发骨折以角度骨折为多见,多发骨折以髁状骨折为多见。其中开放入路88例,封闭入路56例,开合入路32例。结论:骨折类型及病因与骨折类型密切相关。下颌骨骨折应仔细检查,并应尽快采用最适合骨折类型的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EVALUATION OF MANDIBULAR FRACTURE PATTERNS AND TREATMENT METHODS: A SINGLE CENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
Objectives: Mandible fractures are among the most common bone fractures in the maxillofacial region. Correct and early treatment is important in mandible fractures. The aim of this study is to retrospectively examine and analyze the patterns and treatment methods of mandibular fractures seen in patients admitted with trauma. Methods: Patients treated for mandible fractures between 2006- 2021 years were included in this retrospective study. The files and archive records of the patients were scanned retrospectively. Demographic, clinical and radiological data were recorded. The treatment methods of the patients included in the study were evaluated. Results: 176 patients with a total of 246 fractures were included to the study. Simple fractures were found in 130 patients, green tree fractures in 12 patients, and comminuted fractures in 34 patients. There were 147 un-favorable and 29 favorable fractures in total. Fall was found to be the most common etiologic cause in all gender and age groups (n=55, 31.2%). Angle fracture was observed most frequently in single fracture cases, while condyle fracture was the most common accompanying fracture type in multiple fractures. 88 patients were treated with the open and, 56 with the closed approach, and 32 with both the open and closed approach. Conclusion: Fracture type and etiologic cause are closely related with the type of the fracture. Mandible fractures should be carefully examined and the most appropriate treatment for the type of fracture should be applied as soon as possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The correlation between vitamin D levels and inflammation, as well as the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), in people who are over the age of 60. Anxiety, Depression and Coping Styles in Mothers of Children with Cow's Milk Protein Allergy The relationship between spousal support and depression, anxiety, stress, and prenatal attachment in high-risk pregnancies Comparison of serum iron, hemoglobin, ferritin and crp levels in prostate cancer patients with a control group Running title: Serum iron levels in prostate cancer Investigation of Electrocardiogram and Inflammation Parameters in Patients with First Episode Mania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1