英国患者对高血压管理的偏好:离散选择实验

B. Fletcher, Lisa Hinton, R. McManus, Oliver Rivero-Arias
{"title":"英国患者对高血压管理的偏好:离散选择实验","authors":"B. Fletcher, Lisa Hinton, R. McManus, Oliver Rivero-Arias","doi":"10.3399/bjgp19X705101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background With a variety of potentially effective hypertension management options, it is important to determine how patients value different models of care, and the relative importance of factors in their decision-making process. Aim To explore patient preferences for the management of hypertension in the UK. Design and setting Online survey of patients who have hypertension in the UK including an unlabelled discrete choice experiment (DCE). Method A DCE was developed to assess patient preferences for the management of hypertension based on four attributes: model of care, frequency of blood pressure (BP) measurement, reduction in 5-year cardiovascular risk, and costs to the NHS. A mixed logit model was used to estimate preferences, willingness-to-pay was modelled, and a scenario analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of changes in attribute levels on the uptake of different models of care. Results One hundred and sixty-seven participants completed the DCE (aged 61.4 years, 45.0% female, 82.0% >5 years since diagnosis). All four attributes were significant in choice (P<0.05). Reduction in 5-year cardiovascular risk was the main driver of patient preference as evidenced in the scenario and willingness-to-pay analyses. GP management was significantly preferred over self-management. Patients preferred scenarios with more frequent BP measurement, and lower costs to the NHS. Conclusion Participants had similar preferences for GP management, pharmacist management, and telehealth, but a negative preference for self-management. When introducing new models of care for hypertension to patients, discussion of the potential benefits in terms of risk reduction should be prioritised to maximise uptake.","PeriodicalId":22333,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of General Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"e629 - e637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient preferences for management of high blood pressure in the UK: a discrete choice experiment\",\"authors\":\"B. Fletcher, Lisa Hinton, R. McManus, Oliver Rivero-Arias\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/bjgp19X705101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background With a variety of potentially effective hypertension management options, it is important to determine how patients value different models of care, and the relative importance of factors in their decision-making process. Aim To explore patient preferences for the management of hypertension in the UK. Design and setting Online survey of patients who have hypertension in the UK including an unlabelled discrete choice experiment (DCE). Method A DCE was developed to assess patient preferences for the management of hypertension based on four attributes: model of care, frequency of blood pressure (BP) measurement, reduction in 5-year cardiovascular risk, and costs to the NHS. A mixed logit model was used to estimate preferences, willingness-to-pay was modelled, and a scenario analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of changes in attribute levels on the uptake of different models of care. Results One hundred and sixty-seven participants completed the DCE (aged 61.4 years, 45.0% female, 82.0% >5 years since diagnosis). All four attributes were significant in choice (P<0.05). Reduction in 5-year cardiovascular risk was the main driver of patient preference as evidenced in the scenario and willingness-to-pay analyses. GP management was significantly preferred over self-management. Patients preferred scenarios with more frequent BP measurement, and lower costs to the NHS. Conclusion Participants had similar preferences for GP management, pharmacist management, and telehealth, but a negative preference for self-management. When introducing new models of care for hypertension to patients, discussion of the potential benefits in terms of risk reduction should be prioritised to maximise uptake.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"e629 - e637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X705101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X705101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

背景:有多种潜在有效的高血压管理选择,确定患者如何评价不同的护理模式以及决策过程中各因素的相对重要性是很重要的。目的探讨英国患者对高血压治疗的偏好。设计和设置英国高血压患者的在线调查,包括一个未标记的离散选择实验(DCE)。方法采用DCE,根据以下四个属性评估患者对高血压管理的偏好:护理模式、血压(BP)测量频率、5年心血管风险降低以及NHS成本。采用混合logit模型对偏好进行估计,对支付意愿进行建模,并进行情景分析,以评估属性水平的变化对不同护理模式吸收的影响。结果167名参与者完成了DCE检查(年龄61.4岁,女性占45.0%,82.0%自诊断后>5年)。四项指标在选择上均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。情景和支付意愿分析证明,5年心血管风险的降低是患者偏好的主要驱动因素。GP管理明显优于自我管理。患者倾向于更频繁的血压测量和更低的NHS费用。结论参与者对全科医生管理、药师管理和远程医疗的偏好相似,但对自我管理的偏好为负。在向患者介绍新的高血压护理模式时,应优先讨论在降低风险方面的潜在益处,以最大限度地吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient preferences for management of high blood pressure in the UK: a discrete choice experiment
Background With a variety of potentially effective hypertension management options, it is important to determine how patients value different models of care, and the relative importance of factors in their decision-making process. Aim To explore patient preferences for the management of hypertension in the UK. Design and setting Online survey of patients who have hypertension in the UK including an unlabelled discrete choice experiment (DCE). Method A DCE was developed to assess patient preferences for the management of hypertension based on four attributes: model of care, frequency of blood pressure (BP) measurement, reduction in 5-year cardiovascular risk, and costs to the NHS. A mixed logit model was used to estimate preferences, willingness-to-pay was modelled, and a scenario analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of changes in attribute levels on the uptake of different models of care. Results One hundred and sixty-seven participants completed the DCE (aged 61.4 years, 45.0% female, 82.0% >5 years since diagnosis). All four attributes were significant in choice (P<0.05). Reduction in 5-year cardiovascular risk was the main driver of patient preference as evidenced in the scenario and willingness-to-pay analyses. GP management was significantly preferred over self-management. Patients preferred scenarios with more frequent BP measurement, and lower costs to the NHS. Conclusion Participants had similar preferences for GP management, pharmacist management, and telehealth, but a negative preference for self-management. When introducing new models of care for hypertension to patients, discussion of the potential benefits in terms of risk reduction should be prioritised to maximise uptake.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: leading the fight in primary care Dealing with symptoms in the general population: lessons learned from the Danish Symptom Cohort Towards new definitions of avoidable hospital admissions Diagnosing myeloma in general practice: how might earlier diagnosis be achieved? General practice and the Medical Licensing Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1