{"title":"比较用手抓片的指法","authors":"Katrin Wolf, N. Henze","doi":"10.1145/2628363.2628371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the recent success of tablet devices a new device type became available for mobile interaction. Just as for mobile phones, touch is the dominant way people interact with tablets. In contrast to the much smaller phones a firm grip with both hands is needed to securely hold tablet devices. While a large body of work has investigated touch interaction on smaller devices, is little empirical research has been carried out on touch-based pointing while holding the device with both hands. To understand touch-based interactions using tablet devices, we conducted an experiment to compare four pointing techniques on both the front and back of the devices while it was held in landscape format. We compare direct touch with the following alternatives for selecting targets, indirect pointing on a virtual touchpad, an inverse cursor, and a miniature interaction area. While direct touch is 35% faster than the fastest alternative, only 74% of the touchscreen and 64% of a back-of-device can be reached by each hand. We show that among the indirect pointing techniques, the miniaturized interaction area is significantly faster and received the best subjective ratings. We conclude that a miniaturized interaction area is a viable alternative to direct touch especially on the backside of tablet devices.","PeriodicalId":74207,"journal":{"name":"MobileHCI : proceedings of the ... International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. MobileHCI (Conference)","volume":"9 1","pages":"53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing pointing techniques for grasping hands on tablets\",\"authors\":\"Katrin Wolf, N. Henze\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2628363.2628371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the recent success of tablet devices a new device type became available for mobile interaction. Just as for mobile phones, touch is the dominant way people interact with tablets. In contrast to the much smaller phones a firm grip with both hands is needed to securely hold tablet devices. While a large body of work has investigated touch interaction on smaller devices, is little empirical research has been carried out on touch-based pointing while holding the device with both hands. To understand touch-based interactions using tablet devices, we conducted an experiment to compare four pointing techniques on both the front and back of the devices while it was held in landscape format. We compare direct touch with the following alternatives for selecting targets, indirect pointing on a virtual touchpad, an inverse cursor, and a miniature interaction area. While direct touch is 35% faster than the fastest alternative, only 74% of the touchscreen and 64% of a back-of-device can be reached by each hand. We show that among the indirect pointing techniques, the miniaturized interaction area is significantly faster and received the best subjective ratings. We conclude that a miniaturized interaction area is a viable alternative to direct touch especially on the backside of tablet devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MobileHCI : proceedings of the ... International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. MobileHCI (Conference)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"53-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MobileHCI : proceedings of the ... International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. MobileHCI (Conference)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MobileHCI : proceedings of the ... International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. MobileHCI (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

随着最近平板设备的成功,一种新的设备类型出现在移动交互中。就像手机一样,触摸是人们与平板电脑互动的主要方式。与小得多的手机相比,平板设备需要双手紧紧握住。虽然已经有大量的工作调查了小型设备上的触摸交互,但很少有实证研究在双手拿着设备时进行基于触摸的指向。为了理解平板设备的触控互动,我们进行了一项实验,比较了四种指向设备正面和背面的技术。我们比较了直接触摸与以下选择目标的替代方法,虚拟触摸板上的间接指向,反向光标和微型交互区域。虽然直接触摸比最快的替代方式快35%,但每只手只能触摸到74%的触摸屏和64%的设备背面。研究表明,在间接指向技术中,小型化交互区域明显更快,并获得了最好的主观评价。我们的结论是,小型化的交互区域是直接触摸的可行选择,尤其是在平板设备的背面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing pointing techniques for grasping hands on tablets
With the recent success of tablet devices a new device type became available for mobile interaction. Just as for mobile phones, touch is the dominant way people interact with tablets. In contrast to the much smaller phones a firm grip with both hands is needed to securely hold tablet devices. While a large body of work has investigated touch interaction on smaller devices, is little empirical research has been carried out on touch-based pointing while holding the device with both hands. To understand touch-based interactions using tablet devices, we conducted an experiment to compare four pointing techniques on both the front and back of the devices while it was held in landscape format. We compare direct touch with the following alternatives for selecting targets, indirect pointing on a virtual touchpad, an inverse cursor, and a miniature interaction area. While direct touch is 35% faster than the fastest alternative, only 74% of the touchscreen and 64% of a back-of-device can be reached by each hand. We show that among the indirect pointing techniques, the miniaturized interaction area is significantly faster and received the best subjective ratings. We conclude that a miniaturized interaction area is a viable alternative to direct touch especially on the backside of tablet devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling Gliding-based Target Selection for Blind Touchscreen Users. MobileHCI '21: 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction, Extented Abstracts, Toulouse & Virtual Event, France, 27 September 2021 - 1 October 2021 Mobile Manifestations of Alertness: Connecting Biological Rhythms with Patterns of Smartphone App Use. Designing a multi-input modality architecture for universal accessibility Monox: extensible gesture notation for mobile devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1