第三语言协作写作:作者在协作写作任务中如何使用和看待他们的多语库

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2022-03-07 DOI:10.37213/cjal.2022.31288
Caroline Payant, Zeina Maatouk
{"title":"第三语言协作写作:作者在协作写作任务中如何使用和看待他们的多语库","authors":"Caroline Payant, Zeina Maatouk","doi":"10.37213/cjal.2022.31288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have witnessed major development in plurilingual pedagogies which support the use of learners’ repertoire of languages in language learning contexts (Payant & Galante, 2022; Piccardo, 2013).  However, little research has been undertaken to examine adult plurilingual learners’ perceptions towards the use of their languages during authentic collaborative writing tasks and contrasted these views with their actual behaviours.  In this case study, six plurilingual adult learners of English in a Canadian university with three unique L1s (Romanian, Russian, Spanish) completed two collaborative writing tasks on two separate occasions.  Each dyad shared the same linguistic profiles and were encouraged to draw on their entire repertoire to complete the tasks.  Semi-structured interview data shows differing levels of openness towards L1 and L2 (French) use during language-learning writing tasks.  The analysis of the interaction confirms multiple uses for the L1; however, the L2 was seldom observed during interactions.  The findings are discussed from a plurilingual lens and pedagogical implications are discussed.\n ","PeriodicalId":43961,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative Writing in a Third Language: How Writers Use and View Their Plurilingual Repertoire During Collaborative Writing Tasks\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Payant, Zeina Maatouk\",\"doi\":\"10.37213/cjal.2022.31288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent years have witnessed major development in plurilingual pedagogies which support the use of learners’ repertoire of languages in language learning contexts (Payant & Galante, 2022; Piccardo, 2013).  However, little research has been undertaken to examine adult plurilingual learners’ perceptions towards the use of their languages during authentic collaborative writing tasks and contrasted these views with their actual behaviours.  In this case study, six plurilingual adult learners of English in a Canadian university with three unique L1s (Romanian, Russian, Spanish) completed two collaborative writing tasks on two separate occasions.  Each dyad shared the same linguistic profiles and were encouraged to draw on their entire repertoire to complete the tasks.  Semi-structured interview data shows differing levels of openness towards L1 and L2 (French) use during language-learning writing tasks.  The analysis of the interaction confirms multiple uses for the L1; however, the L2 was seldom observed during interactions.  The findings are discussed from a plurilingual lens and pedagogical implications are discussed.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":43961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2022.31288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2022.31288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

近年来,支持学习者在语言学习环境中使用语言库的多语教学法取得了重大发展(Payant & Galante, 2022;Piccardo, 2013)。然而,很少有研究调查成人多语学习者在真正的协作写作任务中对语言使用的看法,并将这些观点与他们的实际行为进行对比。在本案例研究中,加拿大一所大学的六名多语成人英语学习者在两个不同的场合完成了两个协作写作任务,他们使用了三种独特的语言(罗马尼亚语、俄语、西班牙语)。每一对都有相同的语言背景,并被鼓励利用他们的全部技能来完成任务。半结构化访谈数据显示,在语言学习写作任务中,对第一语言和第二语言(法语)使用的开放程度不同。对交互作用的分析证实了L1的多种用途;然而,在相互作用过程中很少观察到L2。研究结果从多语言的角度进行了讨论,并讨论了教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collaborative Writing in a Third Language: How Writers Use and View Their Plurilingual Repertoire During Collaborative Writing Tasks
Recent years have witnessed major development in plurilingual pedagogies which support the use of learners’ repertoire of languages in language learning contexts (Payant & Galante, 2022; Piccardo, 2013).  However, little research has been undertaken to examine adult plurilingual learners’ perceptions towards the use of their languages during authentic collaborative writing tasks and contrasted these views with their actual behaviours.  In this case study, six plurilingual adult learners of English in a Canadian university with three unique L1s (Romanian, Russian, Spanish) completed two collaborative writing tasks on two separate occasions.  Each dyad shared the same linguistic profiles and were encouraged to draw on their entire repertoire to complete the tasks.  Semi-structured interview data shows differing levels of openness towards L1 and L2 (French) use during language-learning writing tasks.  The analysis of the interaction confirms multiple uses for the L1; however, the L2 was seldom observed during interactions.  The findings are discussed from a plurilingual lens and pedagogical implications are discussed.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Évaluer la compréhension en lecture d’un récit et d’un texte informatif auprès d’élèves de 8 ans Review of Mackey, A. (2020). Interaction, feedback and task research in second language learning: Methods and design. Cambridge University Press. Review of Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Teachers’ Perceptions Toward Video as a Tool for Feedback on Students’ Oral Performance English-Language Proficiency Requirements for Migration to Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and the Implications for Language Testing Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1