使用单一神经影像学特征对早发性阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆进行分类

Agnès Pérez-Millan, Laia Borrell, José Contador, M. Balasa, A. Lladó, R. Sánchez-Valle, R. Sala‐Llonch
{"title":"使用单一神经影像学特征对早发性阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆进行分类","authors":"Agnès Pérez-Millan, Laia Borrell, José Contador, M. Balasa, A. Lladó, R. Sánchez-Valle, R. Sala‐Llonch","doi":"10.1117/12.2632990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease (EOAD, <65 years) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) are common forms of early-onset dementia. Therefore, there is a need to establish accurate diagnosis and to obtain markers for disease tracking. We combined supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) to discriminate between EOAD and FTD patients. METHODS: We included 3T-T1 MRI of 203 subjects under 65 years old: 66 healthy controls (CTR, age: 55.0 ± 8.4 years), 85 EOAD patients (age: 57.3 ± 6.1 years) and 52 FTD patients (age: 57.9 ± 4.8 years). We obtained subcortical gray matter volumes and cortical thickness (CTh) regional measures using FreeSurfer. For ML, we performed a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of all volumes and CTh values. Then, the first principal component (PC) was introduced into a Support Vector Machine (SVM). Overall performance was assessed using k-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Our algorithm had an accuracy of 87.2 ± 14.2 % in the CTR vs EOAD classification, 80.8 ± 20.4% for CTR vs FTD, 66.5 ± 12.9 % for EOAD vs FTD and 65.2 ± 10.6% when discriminating the three groups. We used the weights of the first PC to create disease-specific patterns. CONCLUSION: By using a single feature that combines information from CTh and subcortical volumes, our algorithm classifies CTR, EOAD and FTD with good accuracy. We suggest that this approach can be used as a feature reduction strategy in ML algorithms while providing interpretable atrophy patterns.","PeriodicalId":13820,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)","volume":"71 1","pages":"122040D - 122040D-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification between early onset Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia using a single neuroimaging feature\",\"authors\":\"Agnès Pérez-Millan, Laia Borrell, José Contador, M. Balasa, A. Lladó, R. Sánchez-Valle, R. Sala‐Llonch\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2632990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease (EOAD, <65 years) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) are common forms of early-onset dementia. Therefore, there is a need to establish accurate diagnosis and to obtain markers for disease tracking. We combined supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) to discriminate between EOAD and FTD patients. METHODS: We included 3T-T1 MRI of 203 subjects under 65 years old: 66 healthy controls (CTR, age: 55.0 ± 8.4 years), 85 EOAD patients (age: 57.3 ± 6.1 years) and 52 FTD patients (age: 57.9 ± 4.8 years). We obtained subcortical gray matter volumes and cortical thickness (CTh) regional measures using FreeSurfer. For ML, we performed a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of all volumes and CTh values. Then, the first principal component (PC) was introduced into a Support Vector Machine (SVM). Overall performance was assessed using k-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Our algorithm had an accuracy of 87.2 ± 14.2 % in the CTR vs EOAD classification, 80.8 ± 20.4% for CTR vs FTD, 66.5 ± 12.9 % for EOAD vs FTD and 65.2 ± 10.6% when discriminating the three groups. We used the weights of the first PC to create disease-specific patterns. CONCLUSION: By using a single feature that combines information from CTh and subcortical volumes, our algorithm classifies CTR, EOAD and FTD with good accuracy. We suggest that this approach can be used as a feature reduction strategy in ML algorithms while providing interpretable atrophy patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"122040D - 122040D-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2632990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2632990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:早发性阿尔茨海默病(EOAD, <65岁)和额颞叶痴呆(FTD)是早发性痴呆的常见形式。因此,有必要建立准确的诊断并获得疾病跟踪的标记物。我们结合监督和非监督机器学习(ML)来区分EOAD和FTD患者。方法:对203例65岁以下患者进行3T-T1 MRI检查,其中健康对照66例(CTR,年龄55.0±8.4岁),EOAD患者85例(年龄57.3±6.1岁),FTD患者52例(年龄57.9±4.8岁)。我们使用FreeSurfer获得皮层下灰质体积和皮层厚度(CTh)区域测量。对于ML,我们对所有体积和CTh值进行了主成分分析(PCA)。然后,将第一主成分(PC)引入支持向量机(SVM)。使用k-fold交叉验证评估总体性能。结果:该算法对CTR与EOAD的分类准确率为87.2±14.2%,对CTR与FTD的分类准确率为80.8±20.4%,对EOAD与FTD的分类准确率为66.5±12.9%,对三组的分类准确率为65.2±10.6%。我们使用第一台PC的重量来创建特定疾病的模式。结论:该算法利用CTh和皮层下体积信息相结合的单一特征,对CTR、EOAD和FTD进行了较好的分类。我们建议这种方法可以用作ML算法中的特征约简策略,同时提供可解释的萎缩模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Classification between early onset Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia using a single neuroimaging feature
INTRODUCTION: Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease (EOAD, <65 years) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) are common forms of early-onset dementia. Therefore, there is a need to establish accurate diagnosis and to obtain markers for disease tracking. We combined supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) to discriminate between EOAD and FTD patients. METHODS: We included 3T-T1 MRI of 203 subjects under 65 years old: 66 healthy controls (CTR, age: 55.0 ± 8.4 years), 85 EOAD patients (age: 57.3 ± 6.1 years) and 52 FTD patients (age: 57.9 ± 4.8 years). We obtained subcortical gray matter volumes and cortical thickness (CTh) regional measures using FreeSurfer. For ML, we performed a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of all volumes and CTh values. Then, the first principal component (PC) was introduced into a Support Vector Machine (SVM). Overall performance was assessed using k-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Our algorithm had an accuracy of 87.2 ± 14.2 % in the CTR vs EOAD classification, 80.8 ± 20.4% for CTR vs FTD, 66.5 ± 12.9 % for EOAD vs FTD and 65.2 ± 10.6% when discriminating the three groups. We used the weights of the first PC to create disease-specific patterns. CONCLUSION: By using a single feature that combines information from CTh and subcortical volumes, our algorithm classifies CTR, EOAD and FTD with good accuracy. We suggest that this approach can be used as a feature reduction strategy in ML algorithms while providing interpretable atrophy patterns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Moiré metalens-based fluorescence optical sectioning microscopy Novel high entropy alloy (AgAlCuNiTi) hybridized MoS2/Si nanowires heterostructure with plasmonic enhanced photocatalytic activity Structured surface plasmon generated with interfered evanescent waves Dielectric nanoantenna stickers for photoluminescence control A new optomechanical interaction and a model with non-trivial classical dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1