超声引导区域麻醉中高级阻滞的解剖结构超声识别建议

T. Ashken, J. Bowness, A. Macfarlane, L. Turbitt, B. Bellew, N. Bedforth, D. Burckett-St Laurent, A. Delbos, K. El-Boghdadly, N. Elkassabany, Jenny Ferry, B. Fox, J. French, C. Grant, Ashwani Gupta, R. Gupta, Y. Gürkan, N. Haslam, H. Higham, Rosemary Hogg, D. Johnston, R. Kearns, C. Lobo, S. McKinlay, E. Mariano, S. Memtsoudis, P. Merjavy, M. Narayanan, J. A. Noble, David Phillips, M. Rosenblatt, A. Sadler, M. Sebastian, E. Schwenk, Alasdair Taylor, A. Thottungal, L. Valdés-Vilches, T. Volk, S. West, M. Wolmarans, J. Womack, A. Pawa
{"title":"超声引导区域麻醉中高级阻滞的解剖结构超声识别建议","authors":"T. Ashken, J. Bowness, A. Macfarlane, L. Turbitt, B. Bellew, N. Bedforth, D. Burckett-St Laurent, A. Delbos, K. El-Boghdadly, N. Elkassabany, Jenny Ferry, B. Fox, J. French, C. Grant, Ashwani Gupta, R. Gupta, Y. Gürkan, N. Haslam, H. Higham, Rosemary Hogg, D. Johnston, R. Kearns, C. Lobo, S. McKinlay, E. Mariano, S. Memtsoudis, P. Merjavy, M. Narayanan, J. A. Noble, David Phillips, M. Rosenblatt, A. Sadler, M. Sebastian, E. Schwenk, Alasdair Taylor, A. Thottungal, L. Valdés-Vilches, T. Volk, S. West, M. Wolmarans, J. Womack, A. Pawa","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2022-103738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent recommendations describe a set of core anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of basic blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA). This project aimed to generate consensus recommendations for core structures to identify during the performance of intermediate and advanced blocks. An initial longlist of structures was refined by an international panel of key opinion leaders in UGRA over a three-round Delphi process. All rounds were conducted virtually and anonymously. Blocks were considered twice in each round: for “orientation scanning” (the dynamic process of acquiring the final view) and for “block view” (which visualizes the block site and is maintained for needle insertion/injection). A “strong recommendation” was made if ≥75% of participants rated any structure as “definitely include” in any round. A “weak recommendation” was made if >50% of participants rated it as “definitely include” or “probably include” for all rounds, but the criterion for strong recommendation was never met. Structures which did not meet either criterion were excluded. Forty-one participants were invited and 40 accepted; 38 completed all three rounds. Participants considered the ultrasound scanning for 19 peripheral nerve blocks across all three rounds. Two hundred and seventy-four structures were reviewed for both orientation scanning and block view; a “strong recommendation” was made for 60 structures on orientation scanning and 44 on the block view. A “weak recommendation” was made for 107 and 62 structures, respectively. These recommendations are intended to help standardize teaching and research in UGRA and support widespread and consistent practice.","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of intermediate and advanced blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"T. Ashken, J. Bowness, A. Macfarlane, L. Turbitt, B. Bellew, N. Bedforth, D. Burckett-St Laurent, A. Delbos, K. El-Boghdadly, N. Elkassabany, Jenny Ferry, B. Fox, J. French, C. Grant, Ashwani Gupta, R. Gupta, Y. Gürkan, N. Haslam, H. Higham, Rosemary Hogg, D. Johnston, R. Kearns, C. Lobo, S. McKinlay, E. Mariano, S. Memtsoudis, P. Merjavy, M. Narayanan, J. A. Noble, David Phillips, M. Rosenblatt, A. Sadler, M. Sebastian, E. Schwenk, Alasdair Taylor, A. Thottungal, L. Valdés-Vilches, T. Volk, S. West, M. Wolmarans, J. Womack, A. Pawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2022-103738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent recommendations describe a set of core anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of basic blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA). This project aimed to generate consensus recommendations for core structures to identify during the performance of intermediate and advanced blocks. An initial longlist of structures was refined by an international panel of key opinion leaders in UGRA over a three-round Delphi process. All rounds were conducted virtually and anonymously. Blocks were considered twice in each round: for “orientation scanning” (the dynamic process of acquiring the final view) and for “block view” (which visualizes the block site and is maintained for needle insertion/injection). A “strong recommendation” was made if ≥75% of participants rated any structure as “definitely include” in any round. A “weak recommendation” was made if >50% of participants rated it as “definitely include” or “probably include” for all rounds, but the criterion for strong recommendation was never met. Structures which did not meet either criterion were excluded. Forty-one participants were invited and 40 accepted; 38 completed all three rounds. Participants considered the ultrasound scanning for 19 peripheral nerve blocks across all three rounds. Two hundred and seventy-four structures were reviewed for both orientation scanning and block view; a “strong recommendation” was made for 60 structures on orientation scanning and 44 on the block view. A “weak recommendation” was made for 107 and 62 structures, respectively. These recommendations are intended to help standardize teaching and research in UGRA and support widespread and consistent practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2022-103738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2022-103738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

最近的建议描述了一组核心解剖结构,以确定超声引导区域麻醉(UGRA)中基本阻滞的性能。该项目旨在产生核心结构的共识建议,以便在中级和高级区块的开发过程中确定。由安盟主要意见领袖组成的国际小组经过三轮德尔菲进程,拟定了初步的结构清单。所有的回合都是匿名进行的。在每一轮中,块被考虑两次:“定向扫描”(获得最终视图的动态过程)和“块视图”(将块位置可视化并保持针头插入/注射)。如果≥75%的参与者认为任何结构在任何一轮中“绝对包括”,则表示“强烈推荐”。如果50 - 50%的参与者在所有回合中都将其评为“肯定包括”或“可能包括”,则给出“弱推荐”,但从未达到强烈推荐的标准。不符合任何标准的结构都被排除在外。邀请了41人,接受了40人;38人完成了全部三轮。参与者考虑在所有三轮中超声扫描19个周围神经阻滞。对274个结构进行了定向扫描和块视图检查;“强烈建议”60个结构进行定向扫描,44个结构进行块视图。分别对107座和62座建筑物提出“弱建议”。这些建议旨在帮助UGRA的教学和研究标准化,并支持广泛和一致的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recommendations for anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of intermediate and advanced blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia
Recent recommendations describe a set of core anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of basic blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA). This project aimed to generate consensus recommendations for core structures to identify during the performance of intermediate and advanced blocks. An initial longlist of structures was refined by an international panel of key opinion leaders in UGRA over a three-round Delphi process. All rounds were conducted virtually and anonymously. Blocks were considered twice in each round: for “orientation scanning” (the dynamic process of acquiring the final view) and for “block view” (which visualizes the block site and is maintained for needle insertion/injection). A “strong recommendation” was made if ≥75% of participants rated any structure as “definitely include” in any round. A “weak recommendation” was made if >50% of participants rated it as “definitely include” or “probably include” for all rounds, but the criterion for strong recommendation was never met. Structures which did not meet either criterion were excluded. Forty-one participants were invited and 40 accepted; 38 completed all three rounds. Participants considered the ultrasound scanning for 19 peripheral nerve blocks across all three rounds. Two hundred and seventy-four structures were reviewed for both orientation scanning and block view; a “strong recommendation” was made for 60 structures on orientation scanning and 44 on the block view. A “weak recommendation” was made for 107 and 62 structures, respectively. These recommendations are intended to help standardize teaching and research in UGRA and support widespread and consistent practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks—a cadaveric study Multimodal analgesia and the erector spinae plane block in a rapid recovery pathway after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized controlled study of practicality In reply: evaluating the efficacy of PENG and SIFICB in hip fracture analgesia – a critical analysis Invited reply letter: optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks – a cadaveric study Postoperative epidural analgesia and outcomes following pediatric bilateral lung and heart-lung transplantation: a retrospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1