{"title":"总统营销:国事访问的贸易促进效应","authors":"Eugene Beaulieu, Zeng Lian, Shan Wan","doi":"10.1080/1226508X.2020.1792329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper studies the trade promotion effects of state visits paid by Chinese political leaders by analyzing China’s trade flow with 184 countries between 1998 and 2014. International events are used to instrument state visits. The results find that trade promotion effects come two years after the visits. Moreover, the promotion effects are biased towards the industries and firms with connections to the government. Trade barriers offset the promotion effects of state visits.","PeriodicalId":45235,"journal":{"name":"Global Economic Review","volume":"99 1","pages":"309 - 327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presidential Marketing: Trade Promotion Effects of State Visits\",\"authors\":\"Eugene Beaulieu, Zeng Lian, Shan Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1226508X.2020.1792329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper studies the trade promotion effects of state visits paid by Chinese political leaders by analyzing China’s trade flow with 184 countries between 1998 and 2014. International events are used to instrument state visits. The results find that trade promotion effects come two years after the visits. Moreover, the promotion effects are biased towards the industries and firms with connections to the government. Trade barriers offset the promotion effects of state visits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"309 - 327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2020.1792329\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2020.1792329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Presidential Marketing: Trade Promotion Effects of State Visits
ABSTRACT This paper studies the trade promotion effects of state visits paid by Chinese political leaders by analyzing China’s trade flow with 184 countries between 1998 and 2014. International events are used to instrument state visits. The results find that trade promotion effects come two years after the visits. Moreover, the promotion effects are biased towards the industries and firms with connections to the government. Trade barriers offset the promotion effects of state visits.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
