{"title":"基底硬骨鱼与发育形态单系问题。形态学和分子方法","authors":"Arnaud Filleul , Sébastien Lavoué","doi":"10.1016/S0764-4469(00)01302-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The methodology used by previous authors to resolve the relationships of the elopomorphan taxa is criticized. The morphological characters that have been proposed to support the monophyly of the Elopomorpha are reviewed and it is shown that most of them are weak. A new hypothesis of relationships is proposed on the basis of nucleotidic sequences of ribosomal RNA 18S, 16S and 12S. In order to really test all the possible relationships, the monophyly of the Elopomorpha was not considered a priori. The tree was rooted on <em>Amia calva</em> and <em>Lepisosteus osseus</em> and the ingroup taxa sampling was subsequently increased. The obtained topology shows that the Elopomorpha is a non-monophyletic taxon. Elopiforms, anguilliforms, albuliforms and notacanthiforms are considered here as four monophyletic, <em>incertae sedis</em> taxa among basal teleosts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100306,"journal":{"name":"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie","volume":"324 4","pages":"Pages 393-399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0764-4469(00)01302-0","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basal teleosts and the question of elopomorph monophyly. Morphological and molecular approaches\",\"authors\":\"Arnaud Filleul , Sébastien Lavoué\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0764-4469(00)01302-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The methodology used by previous authors to resolve the relationships of the elopomorphan taxa is criticized. The morphological characters that have been proposed to support the monophyly of the Elopomorpha are reviewed and it is shown that most of them are weak. A new hypothesis of relationships is proposed on the basis of nucleotidic sequences of ribosomal RNA 18S, 16S and 12S. In order to really test all the possible relationships, the monophyly of the Elopomorpha was not considered a priori. The tree was rooted on <em>Amia calva</em> and <em>Lepisosteus osseus</em> and the ingroup taxa sampling was subsequently increased. The obtained topology shows that the Elopomorpha is a non-monophyletic taxon. Elopiforms, anguilliforms, albuliforms and notacanthiforms are considered here as four monophyletic, <em>incertae sedis</em> taxa among basal teleosts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie\",\"volume\":\"324 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 393-399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0764-4469(00)01302-0\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0764446900013020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0764446900013020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Basal teleosts and the question of elopomorph monophyly. Morphological and molecular approaches
The methodology used by previous authors to resolve the relationships of the elopomorphan taxa is criticized. The morphological characters that have been proposed to support the monophyly of the Elopomorpha are reviewed and it is shown that most of them are weak. A new hypothesis of relationships is proposed on the basis of nucleotidic sequences of ribosomal RNA 18S, 16S and 12S. In order to really test all the possible relationships, the monophyly of the Elopomorpha was not considered a priori. The tree was rooted on Amia calva and Lepisosteus osseus and the ingroup taxa sampling was subsequently increased. The obtained topology shows that the Elopomorpha is a non-monophyletic taxon. Elopiforms, anguilliforms, albuliforms and notacanthiforms are considered here as four monophyletic, incertae sedis taxa among basal teleosts.