基于讨论模式的学习者学习工作表的发展,以学习推理技能和批判性思维

Rila Putri Anasty Mellenia, S. Admoko
{"title":"基于讨论模式的学习者学习工作表的发展,以学习推理技能和批判性思维","authors":"Rila Putri Anasty Mellenia, S. Admoko","doi":"10.20527/jipf.v6i2.5248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) pembelajaran diskusi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin untuk melatihkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis serta mengetahui validitas, keparaktisan, dan keefektifan LKPD yang telah dikembangkan. Metode Research & Development (R&D) digunakan dengan model penelitian pengembangan yang digunakan yaitu ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). Subjek penelitian yaitu 10 peserta didik kelas XI. Objek penelitian yaitu LKPD pembelajaran diskusi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin. Instrumen penelitian antara lain lembar validasi LKPD, lembar observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran, angket respon peserta didik, serta soal pretest dan posttest. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan: 1) Validitas LKPD berkategori sangat valid dengan persentase 90%. 2) LKPD yang telah dikembangkan dinyatakan praktis berdasarkan hasil observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran berkategori sangat praktis dengan persentase 88% dan berdasarkan hasil respon peserta didik berkategori praktis dengan persentase 77%. 3) Skor rata-rata N-gain adalah 0,6 berkategori sedang, dapat dikatakan bahwa LKPD efektif dalam meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa LKPD pembelajaran diskusi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin untuk melatihkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis dinyatakan valid, efektif, dan praktis, sehingga dapat dimanfaatkan dalam pembelajaran fisika kedepannya. Pengembangan LKPD sejenis pada materi fisika dengan karakteristik yang sama dapat dilakukan lagi untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan argumentasi ilmiah.This study aims to develop discussion learning worksheets based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern to train scientific argumentation skills and critical thinking and to know the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of the worksheets that have been developed. The Research & Development (R&D) method is used with the development research model adopted, namely ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). The object of research is 10 11th students. The research subject is discussion learning worksheets based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern. The research instruments include student worksheets validation sheets, learning implementation observation sheets, student response questionnaires, as well as pretest and post-test questions. The results of this study indicate: 1) The validity of the worksheets is categorized as very valid with a percentage of 90%. 2) Student worksheets that have been developed are declared practical based on the results of observations of the implementation of learning are in the very practical category with a percentage of 88% and based on the results of student responses are in the practical category with a percentage of 77%. 3) The average N-gain score is 0.6 in the medium category, it can be said that the worksheets are effective in improving students' scientific argumentation and critical thinking skills. It can be said that the discussion worksheet based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern to train scientific argumentation and critical thinking skills is declared valid, effective, and practical, so that it can be used in future physics learning. The development of similar student worksheets on physics material with the same characteristics can be done again to improve critical thinking skills and scientific argumentation. ","PeriodicalId":31460,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Pembelajaran Diskusi Berbasis Pola Argumentasi Toulmin untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi dan Berpikir Kritis\",\"authors\":\"Rila Putri Anasty Mellenia, S. Admoko\",\"doi\":\"10.20527/jipf.v6i2.5248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) pembelajaran diskusi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin untuk melatihkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis serta mengetahui validitas, keparaktisan, dan keefektifan LKPD yang telah dikembangkan. Metode Research & Development (R&D) digunakan dengan model penelitian pengembangan yang digunakan yaitu ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). Subjek penelitian yaitu 10 peserta didik kelas XI. Objek penelitian yaitu LKPD pembelajaran diskusi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin. Instrumen penelitian antara lain lembar validasi LKPD, lembar observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran, angket respon peserta didik, serta soal pretest dan posttest. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan: 1) Validitas LKPD berkategori sangat valid dengan persentase 90%. 2) LKPD yang telah dikembangkan dinyatakan praktis berdasarkan hasil observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran berkategori sangat praktis dengan persentase 88% dan berdasarkan hasil respon peserta didik berkategori praktis dengan persentase 77%. 3) Skor rata-rata N-gain adalah 0,6 berkategori sedang, dapat dikatakan bahwa LKPD efektif dalam meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa LKPD pembelajaran diskusi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin untuk melatihkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis dinyatakan valid, efektif, dan praktis, sehingga dapat dimanfaatkan dalam pembelajaran fisika kedepannya. Pengembangan LKPD sejenis pada materi fisika dengan karakteristik yang sama dapat dilakukan lagi untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan argumentasi ilmiah.This study aims to develop discussion learning worksheets based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern to train scientific argumentation skills and critical thinking and to know the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of the worksheets that have been developed. The Research & Development (R&D) method is used with the development research model adopted, namely ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). The object of research is 10 11th students. The research subject is discussion learning worksheets based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern. The research instruments include student worksheets validation sheets, learning implementation observation sheets, student response questionnaires, as well as pretest and post-test questions. The results of this study indicate: 1) The validity of the worksheets is categorized as very valid with a percentage of 90%. 2) Student worksheets that have been developed are declared practical based on the results of observations of the implementation of learning are in the very practical category with a percentage of 88% and based on the results of student responses are in the practical category with a percentage of 77%. 3) The average N-gain score is 0.6 in the medium category, it can be said that the worksheets are effective in improving students' scientific argumentation and critical thinking skills. It can be said that the discussion worksheet based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern to train scientific argumentation and critical thinking skills is declared valid, effective, and practical, so that it can be used in future physics learning. The development of similar student worksheets on physics material with the same characteristics can be done again to improve critical thinking skills and scientific argumentation. \",\"PeriodicalId\":31460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v6i2.5248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v6i2.5248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究旨在开发基于Toulmin论证模式的讨论学习表,以训练科学推理技能和批判性思维,并了解所学知识的有效性。研究开发方法(R&D)与ADDIE(分析、设计、开发、实现、评估)的应用研究模型一起使用。研究对象为10名大二学生。研究对象是基于学习的讨论模式Toulmin。研究工具包括对学习的验证表、对学习者的观察表、学习者的反应能力以及之前和之后的问题。研究结果显示:1)该报告的有效性是90%。2)研究所得的结论是基于基于88%的论文研究结果,以及基于基于77%学习者的实际反应。3) n -增益的平均分数是0.6个中等水平的文件,可以说是有效地提高了参与者的科学推理技能和批判性思维。可以得出结论,基于讨论模式的托尔敏推理技能的训练和批判性思维技能被认为是有效的、有效的和实用的,因此可以用于未来的物理学习。具有相同特征的物理物质的类似发展可以再次发展,以提高批判性思维和科学推理能力。这项研究以培训工作为基础,基于工具的推理技巧和批判性思维模式,并了解已经发展的工作的有效性、实践和效果。研究与发展(R&D)方法用于开发研究模型adopted, namely ADDIE(分析,设计,开发,实现,评估)。研究的目标是10个学生。这项研究主席团基于土明的论点模式,反对学习工作。研究工具包括学生工作保障sheets,学习执行表,学生回答问题,如前所述和后问问题。这项研究的结果是:这项工作的有效性与90%的percentage非常有效。2)学生worksheets,以至于有被developed是declared practical改编自《implementation of the results of一名学习是非常practical类别中的a percentage of 88%和改编自the results of学生和a percentage of practical类别中的“回嘴是77%。3)在媒介类别中,平均增益分数为0.6分,这可以说,这项工作在培养学生的科学推理和批判性思维技能方面是有效的。可以这样说,基于托尔敏对《科学推理与批判思维技能》的讨论模式的讨论模式是有效的、有效的和实用的,所以它可以在未来的物理学习中使用。在物理材料上与具有相同特征的类似学生工作的发展可以再次进行修正,修正科学的思维技巧和科学论证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Pembelajaran Diskusi Berbasis Pola Argumentasi Toulmin untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi dan Berpikir Kritis
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) pembelajaran diskusi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin untuk melatihkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis serta mengetahui validitas, keparaktisan, dan keefektifan LKPD yang telah dikembangkan. Metode Research & Development (R&D) digunakan dengan model penelitian pengembangan yang digunakan yaitu ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). Subjek penelitian yaitu 10 peserta didik kelas XI. Objek penelitian yaitu LKPD pembelajaran diskusi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin. Instrumen penelitian antara lain lembar validasi LKPD, lembar observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran, angket respon peserta didik, serta soal pretest dan posttest. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan: 1) Validitas LKPD berkategori sangat valid dengan persentase 90%. 2) LKPD yang telah dikembangkan dinyatakan praktis berdasarkan hasil observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran berkategori sangat praktis dengan persentase 88% dan berdasarkan hasil respon peserta didik berkategori praktis dengan persentase 77%. 3) Skor rata-rata N-gain adalah 0,6 berkategori sedang, dapat dikatakan bahwa LKPD efektif dalam meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa LKPD pembelajaran diskusi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin untuk melatihkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis dinyatakan valid, efektif, dan praktis, sehingga dapat dimanfaatkan dalam pembelajaran fisika kedepannya. Pengembangan LKPD sejenis pada materi fisika dengan karakteristik yang sama dapat dilakukan lagi untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan argumentasi ilmiah.This study aims to develop discussion learning worksheets based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern to train scientific argumentation skills and critical thinking and to know the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of the worksheets that have been developed. The Research & Development (R&D) method is used with the development research model adopted, namely ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). The object of research is 10 11th students. The research subject is discussion learning worksheets based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern. The research instruments include student worksheets validation sheets, learning implementation observation sheets, student response questionnaires, as well as pretest and post-test questions. The results of this study indicate: 1) The validity of the worksheets is categorized as very valid with a percentage of 90%. 2) Student worksheets that have been developed are declared practical based on the results of observations of the implementation of learning are in the very practical category with a percentage of 88% and based on the results of student responses are in the practical category with a percentage of 77%. 3) The average N-gain score is 0.6 in the medium category, it can be said that the worksheets are effective in improving students' scientific argumentation and critical thinking skills. It can be said that the discussion worksheet based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern to train scientific argumentation and critical thinking skills is declared valid, effective, and practical, so that it can be used in future physics learning. The development of similar student worksheets on physics material with the same characteristics can be done again to improve critical thinking skills and scientific argumentation. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploration of Increasing Students’ Critical Thinking in the Guided Discovery Learning Model on Light Waves An Analysis of Learning Styles on Renewable Energy Material in Independent Curriculum for Differentiation Learning REACT Learning on the Topic of Elasticity to Enhance Students' Analytical Abilities The Effect of Ethnoscience-Based Science Environment Technology Society (SETS) Learning Model in Learning Physics and Biology Is 21st Century Learning Need STEM Approach built into Physics Comics?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1