伊朗应对COVID-19大流行:政策能力的动态视角

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Asian Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-06-02 DOI:10.1080/17516234.2021.1930682
H. Sajadi, K. Hartley
{"title":"伊朗应对COVID-19大流行:政策能力的动态视角","authors":"H. Sajadi, K. Hartley","doi":"10.1080/17516234.2021.1930682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Iran’s policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates how countries with pre-existing challenges manage acute crises. Already economically weakened by international sanctions, Iran’s government was forced to consider short-term tradeoffs between public health and social stability in pandemic response, with imminent unemployment and food insecurity used to justify a policy pivot from mitigation to economic continuity. This article investigates the policy responses of Iran’s government during the crucial first months of the pandemic, using data obtained through interviews structured around SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) and interpreted to elicit insights for policy capacity theory and practice. Explanations for Iran’s initially ineffective pandemic response are found to include weakness in economic policy, failure to coordinate public health initiatives, priority of treatment over prevention, insufficient public engagement, and inadequate healthcare facilities. Policy recommendations emerging from the study are comprehensive and coordinated pandemic management efforts, community-based and proactive approaches, targeted economic stimulus, and a clear policy vision for crisis resolution. The discussion integrates policy capacity into explanations and recommendations to illustrate the applied value of the concept in crisis settings characterized by uncertainty and rapid onset.","PeriodicalId":45051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","volume":"18 1","pages":"228 - 249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 pandemic response in Iran: a dynamic perspective on policy capacity\",\"authors\":\"H. Sajadi, K. Hartley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17516234.2021.1930682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Iran’s policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates how countries with pre-existing challenges manage acute crises. Already economically weakened by international sanctions, Iran’s government was forced to consider short-term tradeoffs between public health and social stability in pandemic response, with imminent unemployment and food insecurity used to justify a policy pivot from mitigation to economic continuity. This article investigates the policy responses of Iran’s government during the crucial first months of the pandemic, using data obtained through interviews structured around SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) and interpreted to elicit insights for policy capacity theory and practice. Explanations for Iran’s initially ineffective pandemic response are found to include weakness in economic policy, failure to coordinate public health initiatives, priority of treatment over prevention, insufficient public engagement, and inadequate healthcare facilities. Policy recommendations emerging from the study are comprehensive and coordinated pandemic management efforts, community-based and proactive approaches, targeted economic stimulus, and a clear policy vision for crisis resolution. The discussion integrates policy capacity into explanations and recommendations to illustrate the applied value of the concept in crisis settings characterized by uncertainty and rapid onset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asian Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"228 - 249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asian Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1930682\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1930682","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

伊朗应对COVID-19大流行的政策说明了面临挑战的国家如何管理严重危机。由于国际制裁,经济已经受到削弱,伊朗政府被迫考虑在应对大流行时在公共卫生和社会稳定之间进行短期权衡,迫在眉睫的失业和粮食不安全被用来证明从缓解转向经济连续性的政策是合理的。本文利用围绕SWOT分析(优势、劣势、机会和威胁)进行的访谈获得的数据,调查了伊朗政府在疫情关键的头几个月采取的政策应对措施,并对这些数据进行了解释,以获得对政策能力理论和实践的见解。报告发现,伊朗最初对大流行病的应对无效的解释包括经济政策薄弱、未能协调公共卫生举措、治疗优先于预防、公众参与不足以及卫生保健设施不足。该研究提出的政策建议包括全面和协调的大流行病管理工作、以社区为基础的积极主动办法、有针对性的经济刺激措施以及解决危机的明确政策愿景。讨论将政策能力整合到解释和建议中,以说明该概念在不确定性和快速爆发的危机环境中的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 pandemic response in Iran: a dynamic perspective on policy capacity
ABSTRACT Iran’s policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates how countries with pre-existing challenges manage acute crises. Already economically weakened by international sanctions, Iran’s government was forced to consider short-term tradeoffs between public health and social stability in pandemic response, with imminent unemployment and food insecurity used to justify a policy pivot from mitigation to economic continuity. This article investigates the policy responses of Iran’s government during the crucial first months of the pandemic, using data obtained through interviews structured around SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) and interpreted to elicit insights for policy capacity theory and practice. Explanations for Iran’s initially ineffective pandemic response are found to include weakness in economic policy, failure to coordinate public health initiatives, priority of treatment over prevention, insufficient public engagement, and inadequate healthcare facilities. Policy recommendations emerging from the study are comprehensive and coordinated pandemic management efforts, community-based and proactive approaches, targeted economic stimulus, and a clear policy vision for crisis resolution. The discussion integrates policy capacity into explanations and recommendations to illustrate the applied value of the concept in crisis settings characterized by uncertainty and rapid onset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The effect of incentives and procedure simplification in policy implementation: evidence from a survey experiment on waste sorting Situated usage of generative AI in policy education: implications for teaching, learning, and research Scaling up policy entrepreneurship strategies from the local to the national level: the unlikely rise of basic income from agenda universe to decision agenda Unveiling the impact of policy entrepreneurs on South Korea’s social economy: a media analysis Digital regulation, enforcement attitudes, and discretionary decision-making of regulatory street-level bureaucrats during a pandemic emergency: an experimental study in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1