案例研究:利用机器学习和超深读电阻率更好地圈定储层

Hsu-hsiang Wu, A. Walmsley, Pan Li, D. Weixin, M. Bittar, S. Gear
{"title":"案例研究:利用机器学习和超深读电阻率更好地圈定储层","authors":"Hsu-hsiang Wu, A. Walmsley, Pan Li, D. Weixin, M. Bittar, S. Gear","doi":"10.2523/iptc-20152-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Understanding reservoir fluid and facies distribution is crucial for optimal reservoir development. Ultra-deep, logging-while-drilling (LWD) resistivity measurements with a deep detection range into the formation have started a new chapter of formation evaluation. A hybrid inversion of statistical and deterministic approaches based on ultra-deep measurements has successfully determined formation resistivity profiles more than 100 ft away from drilled wellbores, providing proactive geosteering information for real-time well-placement decisions. However, the inversion sometimes produces artificial geological features because of so-called solution ambiguities attributable to lower measurement sensitivity in certain formation resistivity contrasts and reservoir geometries. Previously, geosteering geologists were trained to recognize such unrealistic geological structures based on multiple sources of information, rather than just the ultra-deep resistivity inversion results.\n This paper introduces machine-learning (ML) algorithms to evaluate the sensitivity of individual measurements, as well as to cluster the inverted models to acquire more geologically reasonable models of the surrounding formations. A case study shows significant improvement as a result of the ML algorithm in the structural consistency of the reservoirs. The boundaries were better determined with fine details using the ML algorithm, as compared to results from existing algorithms. The enhanced answer product enabled a better understanding of the formation properties surrounding the wellbore and retrieved several fine features that were not observed previously.","PeriodicalId":11058,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, January 14, 2020","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case Study: Using Machine Learning and Ultra-Deep-Reading Resistivity for Better Reservoir Delineation\",\"authors\":\"Hsu-hsiang Wu, A. Walmsley, Pan Li, D. Weixin, M. Bittar, S. Gear\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-20152-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Understanding reservoir fluid and facies distribution is crucial for optimal reservoir development. Ultra-deep, logging-while-drilling (LWD) resistivity measurements with a deep detection range into the formation have started a new chapter of formation evaluation. A hybrid inversion of statistical and deterministic approaches based on ultra-deep measurements has successfully determined formation resistivity profiles more than 100 ft away from drilled wellbores, providing proactive geosteering information for real-time well-placement decisions. However, the inversion sometimes produces artificial geological features because of so-called solution ambiguities attributable to lower measurement sensitivity in certain formation resistivity contrasts and reservoir geometries. Previously, geosteering geologists were trained to recognize such unrealistic geological structures based on multiple sources of information, rather than just the ultra-deep resistivity inversion results.\\n This paper introduces machine-learning (ML) algorithms to evaluate the sensitivity of individual measurements, as well as to cluster the inverted models to acquire more geologically reasonable models of the surrounding formations. A case study shows significant improvement as a result of the ML algorithm in the structural consistency of the reservoirs. The boundaries were better determined with fine details using the ML algorithm, as compared to results from existing algorithms. The enhanced answer product enabled a better understanding of the formation properties surrounding the wellbore and retrieved several fine features that were not observed previously.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, January 14, 2020\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, January 14, 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-20152-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, January 14, 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-20152-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

了解储层流体和相分布对于优化储层开发至关重要。超深随钻测井(LWD)电阻率测量,其探测范围深入地层,开启了地层评价的新篇章。基于超深测量的统计和确定性混合反演方法已经成功地确定了距钻孔100英尺以上的地层电阻率剖面,为实时井位决策提供了主动地质导向信息。然而,由于某些地层电阻率对比和储层几何形状的测量灵敏度较低,导致所谓的解模糊,反演有时会产生人为的地质特征。以前,地质导向地质学家接受的培训是基于多种信息来源,而不仅仅是超深电阻率反演结果,来识别这种不现实的地质构造。本文引入机器学习(ML)算法来评估单个测量的敏感性,并对反演模型进行聚类,以获得更合理的周围地层地质模型。实例研究表明,ML算法在储层结构一致性方面有显著改善。与现有算法的结果相比,使用ML算法可以更好地确定精细细节的边界。增强型应答产品能够更好地了解井筒周围的地层特性,并检索到以前未观察到的一些精细特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Case Study: Using Machine Learning and Ultra-Deep-Reading Resistivity for Better Reservoir Delineation
Understanding reservoir fluid and facies distribution is crucial for optimal reservoir development. Ultra-deep, logging-while-drilling (LWD) resistivity measurements with a deep detection range into the formation have started a new chapter of formation evaluation. A hybrid inversion of statistical and deterministic approaches based on ultra-deep measurements has successfully determined formation resistivity profiles more than 100 ft away from drilled wellbores, providing proactive geosteering information for real-time well-placement decisions. However, the inversion sometimes produces artificial geological features because of so-called solution ambiguities attributable to lower measurement sensitivity in certain formation resistivity contrasts and reservoir geometries. Previously, geosteering geologists were trained to recognize such unrealistic geological structures based on multiple sources of information, rather than just the ultra-deep resistivity inversion results. This paper introduces machine-learning (ML) algorithms to evaluate the sensitivity of individual measurements, as well as to cluster the inverted models to acquire more geologically reasonable models of the surrounding formations. A case study shows significant improvement as a result of the ML algorithm in the structural consistency of the reservoirs. The boundaries were better determined with fine details using the ML algorithm, as compared to results from existing algorithms. The enhanced answer product enabled a better understanding of the formation properties surrounding the wellbore and retrieved several fine features that were not observed previously.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of different ammonium lignosulfonate contents on the crystallization, rheological behaviors, and thermal and mechanical properties of ethylene propylene diene monomer/polypropylene/ammonium lignosulfonate composites Root cause analysis of cationic polymer additive efficiency decline in virgin and recycle containerboard mills Wheat straw as an alternative pulp fiber A new approach for the preparation of cellulose nanocrystals from bamboo pulp through extremely low acid hydrolysis Root traits and carbon input by sweet sorghum genotypes differs in two climatic conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1