双嘧达莫ER和乙酰水杨酸200 mg + 25 mg胶囊在成年健康男女空腹条件下的稳态生物等效性研究

S. Tippabhotla, Sandeep Yergude, C. Gadiko, S. Thota, Sohel Md. Khan, R. Battula, V. Vobalaboina
{"title":"双嘧达莫ER和乙酰水杨酸200 mg + 25 mg胶囊在成年健康男女空腹条件下的稳态生物等效性研究","authors":"S. Tippabhotla, Sandeep Yergude, C. Gadiko, S. Thota, Sohel Md. Khan, R. Battula, V. Vobalaboina","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2013.803113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the study was to evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics and establish bioequivalence between the test (dipyridamole ER and acetyl salicylic acid 200 mg + 25 mg capsules of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, India) against equal doses of reference (AGGRENOX® retard capsule of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany) formulations in 72 healthy adult male and female volunteers under fasting conditions. This was an open-label, block randomized, multiple dose, two-period, two-sequence, cross-over study separated by a washout period of 8 days. On day 5 of each period, post-dose blood samples were collected up to 12 h and analyzed for dipyridamole, salicylic acid and acetyl salicylic acid using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The 90% CI for dipyridamole (AUC(0–τ).ss, Cmax.ss and Cmin.ss) and for salicylic acid (AUC(0–τ).ss, Cmax.ss and %ptf) lie within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00–125.00%, thus permitting one to conclude for bioequivalence. In conclusion, both the formulations were well tolerated and the test product was bioequivalent to the reference product in terms of the rate and extent of absorption at steady state.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"60 1","pages":"38 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Steady state bioequivalence study of dipyridamole ER and acetyl salicylic acid 200 mg + 25  mg capsules in adult healthy male and female volunteers under fasting condition\",\"authors\":\"S. Tippabhotla, Sandeep Yergude, C. Gadiko, S. Thota, Sohel Md. Khan, R. Battula, V. Vobalaboina\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10601333.2013.803113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of the study was to evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics and establish bioequivalence between the test (dipyridamole ER and acetyl salicylic acid 200 mg + 25 mg capsules of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, India) against equal doses of reference (AGGRENOX® retard capsule of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany) formulations in 72 healthy adult male and female volunteers under fasting conditions. This was an open-label, block randomized, multiple dose, two-period, two-sequence, cross-over study separated by a washout period of 8 days. On day 5 of each period, post-dose blood samples were collected up to 12 h and analyzed for dipyridamole, salicylic acid and acetyl salicylic acid using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The 90% CI for dipyridamole (AUC(0–τ).ss, Cmax.ss and Cmin.ss) and for salicylic acid (AUC(0–τ).ss, Cmax.ss and %ptf) lie within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00–125.00%, thus permitting one to conclude for bioequivalence. In conclusion, both the formulations were well tolerated and the test product was bioequivalent to the reference product in terms of the rate and extent of absorption at steady state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"38 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2013.803113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2013.803113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是在72名健康成年志愿者的禁食条件下,评估稳态药代动力学并建立试验(双嘧达莫ER和乙酰水杨酸200 mg + 25 mg胶囊,Dr. Reddy 's Laboratories Limited,印度)与等剂量参考(勃林格殷格翰制药有限公司,KG 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein,德国)配方的AGGRENOX®延迟胶囊之间的生物等效性。这是一项开放标签、块随机、多剂量、两期、两序列、交叉研究,中间间隔8天洗脱期。在每个周期的第5天,采集给药后12 h的血液样本,使用经过验证的LC-MS/MS方法分析双嘧达莫、水杨酸和乙酰水杨酸。双嘧达莫的90% CI (AUC(0 -τ))。党卫军,Cmax。ss和Cmin.ss)和水杨酸(AUC(0 -τ))。党卫军,Cmax。Ss和%ptf)在80.00-125.00%的可接受生物等效性范围内,因此可以得出生物等效性的结论。综上所述,两种制剂均具有良好的耐受性,在稳态吸收速率和吸收程度方面,试验产品与对照产品具有生物等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Steady state bioequivalence study of dipyridamole ER and acetyl salicylic acid 200 mg + 25  mg capsules in adult healthy male and female volunteers under fasting condition
Abstract The aim of the study was to evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics and establish bioequivalence between the test (dipyridamole ER and acetyl salicylic acid 200 mg + 25 mg capsules of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, India) against equal doses of reference (AGGRENOX® retard capsule of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany) formulations in 72 healthy adult male and female volunteers under fasting conditions. This was an open-label, block randomized, multiple dose, two-period, two-sequence, cross-over study separated by a washout period of 8 days. On day 5 of each period, post-dose blood samples were collected up to 12 h and analyzed for dipyridamole, salicylic acid and acetyl salicylic acid using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The 90% CI for dipyridamole (AUC(0–τ).ss, Cmax.ss and Cmin.ss) and for salicylic acid (AUC(0–τ).ss, Cmax.ss and %ptf) lie within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00–125.00%, thus permitting one to conclude for bioequivalence. In conclusion, both the formulations were well tolerated and the test product was bioequivalent to the reference product in terms of the rate and extent of absorption at steady state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes to protocol in the regulation of adverse drug reactions – historical and current European view Policy and regulations in light of the human body as a ‘superorganism’ containing multiple, intertwined symbiotic relationships Community pharmacists’ knowledge and perceptions on risk management plans in the Southern Region of Portugal Increasing the odds of effective drug development: Elevating regulatory affairs professionals to strategic partners Current regulatory challenges and approaches in the registration of herbal drugs in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1