消费者在哪里就是商品:当前商业言语定义的难点

E. Bernstein, Theresa J. Lee
{"title":"消费者在哪里就是商品:当前商业言语定义的难点","authors":"E. Bernstein, Theresa J. Lee","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2019270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The business model for many online companies — Facebook, Google, and Pinterest are prime examples — does not involve a direct economic transaction with users. Rather companies entice consumers to provide personal information in exchange for access to free services. Although consumers, privacy advocates, scholars, and these companies may assume that the government can regulate the companies' advertising and compel the posting of a privacy policy, the current test for commercial speech only encompasses speech that proposes a direct economic transaction. This Article examines alternate formulations of a commercial speech test that would cover the speech of companies favoring indirect business models that \"sell against\" the personal information of those availing themselves of free products.","PeriodicalId":18488,"journal":{"name":"Michigan State international law review","volume":"39 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where the Consumer is the Commodity: The Difficulty with the Current Definition of Commercial Speech\",\"authors\":\"E. Bernstein, Theresa J. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2019270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The business model for many online companies — Facebook, Google, and Pinterest are prime examples — does not involve a direct economic transaction with users. Rather companies entice consumers to provide personal information in exchange for access to free services. Although consumers, privacy advocates, scholars, and these companies may assume that the government can regulate the companies' advertising and compel the posting of a privacy policy, the current test for commercial speech only encompasses speech that proposes a direct economic transaction. This Article examines alternate formulations of a commercial speech test that would cover the speech of companies favoring indirect business models that \\\"sell against\\\" the personal information of those availing themselves of free products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Michigan State international law review\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Michigan State international law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2019270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan State international law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2019270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

许多在线公司的商业模式——Facebook、谷歌和Pinterest是最好的例子——不涉及与用户的直接经济交易。相反,公司会诱使消费者提供个人信息,以换取免费服务。尽管消费者、隐私倡导者、学者和这些公司可能认为政府可以监管公司的广告并强制发布隐私政策,但目前对商业言论的检验只包括提出直接经济交易的言论。本文研究了商业语音测试的替代方案,该测试将涵盖那些倾向于“销售”那些利用免费产品的个人信息的间接商业模式的公司的语音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Where the Consumer is the Commodity: The Difficulty with the Current Definition of Commercial Speech
The business model for many online companies — Facebook, Google, and Pinterest are prime examples — does not involve a direct economic transaction with users. Rather companies entice consumers to provide personal information in exchange for access to free services. Although consumers, privacy advocates, scholars, and these companies may assume that the government can regulate the companies' advertising and compel the posting of a privacy policy, the current test for commercial speech only encompasses speech that proposes a direct economic transaction. This Article examines alternate formulations of a commercial speech test that would cover the speech of companies favoring indirect business models that "sell against" the personal information of those availing themselves of free products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Incomparable Chief Justiceship of William Howard Taft Looking for a Life Raft: Citizen Voice and Votes of No Confidence Retracing the Right to Free Movement: Mapping a Path Forward Patent Reform, Then and Now The Obligation to Grant Nationality to Stateless Children under Customary International Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1