泰国人群低密度脂蛋白胆固醇计算公式的比较

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.4103/jnsbm.jnsbm_53_21
L. Rerksuppaphol, S. Rerksuppaphol
{"title":"泰国人群低密度脂蛋白胆固醇计算公式的比较","authors":"L. Rerksuppaphol, S. Rerksuppaphol","doi":"10.4103/jnsbm.jnsbm_53_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been established as a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Various equations have been proposed for LDL-C calculation; however, the accuracy of these equations varies among different ethnicities. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and concordance of LDL-C equations for dyslipidemia classifications in Thai adults. Materials and Methods: The lipid profiles of 1091 healthy Thai adults were measured using a homogenous enzymatic assay. The estimated LDL-C equations by Friedewald, Ahmadi, Anandaraja, Chen, Cordova, Densethakul, Hattori, Martin, Puavillai, Sampson, and Vujovic were compared to directly measured LDL-C using Pearson's correlation test. Cohen's kappa statistic was also used to test the concordance of the LDL-C equations with directly measured LDL-C levels, according to the standard guidelines for blood cholesterol management. Results: The LDL-C values calculated by Friedewald, Sampson, and Chen equations showed a high degree of correlation and values close to directly measured LDL-C levels with mean differences ranging from − 0.04 to 0.07 mmol/L. All these three equations had a high degree of concordances with directly measured LDL-C levels for classifying the degree of dyslipidemia. Conclusion: Friedewald, Sampson, and Chen equations showed better estimations of LDL-C levels and had higher accuracy in classifying the degree of LDL-C strata than other equations in the Thai population.","PeriodicalId":16373,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"224 - 229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of equations for the calculation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in thai population\",\"authors\":\"L. Rerksuppaphol, S. Rerksuppaphol\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jnsbm.jnsbm_53_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been established as a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Various equations have been proposed for LDL-C calculation; however, the accuracy of these equations varies among different ethnicities. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and concordance of LDL-C equations for dyslipidemia classifications in Thai adults. Materials and Methods: The lipid profiles of 1091 healthy Thai adults were measured using a homogenous enzymatic assay. The estimated LDL-C equations by Friedewald, Ahmadi, Anandaraja, Chen, Cordova, Densethakul, Hattori, Martin, Puavillai, Sampson, and Vujovic were compared to directly measured LDL-C using Pearson's correlation test. Cohen's kappa statistic was also used to test the concordance of the LDL-C equations with directly measured LDL-C levels, according to the standard guidelines for blood cholesterol management. Results: The LDL-C values calculated by Friedewald, Sampson, and Chen equations showed a high degree of correlation and values close to directly measured LDL-C levels with mean differences ranging from − 0.04 to 0.07 mmol/L. All these three equations had a high degree of concordances with directly measured LDL-C levels for classifying the degree of dyslipidemia. Conclusion: Friedewald, Sampson, and Chen equations showed better estimations of LDL-C levels and had higher accuracy in classifying the degree of LDL-C strata than other equations in the Thai population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"224 - 229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsbm.jnsbm_53_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsbm.jnsbm_53_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)已被确定为心血管疾病的主要危险因素。各种计算LDL-C的方程已被提出;然而,这些方程的准确性在不同的种族之间有所不同。本研究旨在评估泰国成人血脂异常分类的LDL-C方程的准确性和一致性。材料和方法:1091名泰国健康成人的脂质谱采用均质酶法测定。使用Pearson相关检验将Friedewald、Ahmadi、Anandaraja、Chen、Cordova、Densethakul、Hattori、Martin、Puavillai、Sampson和Vujovic估计的LDL-C方程与直接测量的LDL-C进行比较。根据血胆固醇管理的标准指南,还使用Cohen的kappa统计量来检验LDL-C方程与直接测量的LDL-C水平的一致性。结果:Friedewald、Sampson和Chen方程计算的LDL-C值与直接测量的LDL-C水平高度相关,平均差值为- 0.04 ~ 0.07 mmol/L。这三个方程与直接测量的LDL-C水平在判定血脂异常程度上有高度的一致性。结论:在泰国人群中,Friedewald、Sampson和Chen方程能更好地估计LDL-C水平,并且在分类LDL-C分层程度方面比其他方程具有更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of equations for the calculation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in thai population
Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been established as a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Various equations have been proposed for LDL-C calculation; however, the accuracy of these equations varies among different ethnicities. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and concordance of LDL-C equations for dyslipidemia classifications in Thai adults. Materials and Methods: The lipid profiles of 1091 healthy Thai adults were measured using a homogenous enzymatic assay. The estimated LDL-C equations by Friedewald, Ahmadi, Anandaraja, Chen, Cordova, Densethakul, Hattori, Martin, Puavillai, Sampson, and Vujovic were compared to directly measured LDL-C using Pearson's correlation test. Cohen's kappa statistic was also used to test the concordance of the LDL-C equations with directly measured LDL-C levels, according to the standard guidelines for blood cholesterol management. Results: The LDL-C values calculated by Friedewald, Sampson, and Chen equations showed a high degree of correlation and values close to directly measured LDL-C levels with mean differences ranging from − 0.04 to 0.07 mmol/L. All these three equations had a high degree of concordances with directly measured LDL-C levels for classifying the degree of dyslipidemia. Conclusion: Friedewald, Sampson, and Chen equations showed better estimations of LDL-C levels and had higher accuracy in classifying the degree of LDL-C strata than other equations in the Thai population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine
Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biochemical role of zinc in dengue fever Concentration of chromium and nickel in serum of patients with orthopedic implant: An analysis Self-reliance in advanced diagnostic imaging for accessible, affordable, and quality health care in India A rare occurrence of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor in a young female Effects of muscle-specific exercises compared to existing interventions on insulin resistance among prediabetes population of South India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1