{"title":"树状网络的有效特征值计数","authors":"Grover E. C. Guzman, P. Stadler, André Fujita","doi":"10.1093/comnet/cnac040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Estimating the number of eigenvalues $\\mu_{[a,b]}$ of a network’s adjacency matrix in a given interval $[a,b]$ is essential in several fields. The straightforward approach consists of calculating all the eigenvalues in $O(n^3)$ (where $n$ is the number of nodes in the network) and then counting the ones that belong to the interval $[a,b]$. Another approach is to use Sylvester’s law of inertia, which also requires $O(n^3)$. Although both methods provide the exact number of eigenvalues in $[a,b]$, their application for large networks is computationally infeasible. Sometimes, an approximation of $\\mu_{[a,b]}$ is enough. In this case, Chebyshev’s method approximates $\\mu_{[a,b]}$ in $O(|E|)$ (where $|E|$ is the number of edges). This study presents two alternatives to compute $\\mu_{[a,b]}$ for locally tree-like networks: edge- and degree-based algorithms. The former presented a better accuracy than Chebyshev’s method. It runs in $O(d|E|)$, where $d$ is the number of iterations. The latter presented slightly lower accuracy but ran linearly ($O(n)$).","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient eigenvalue counts for tree-like networks\",\"authors\":\"Grover E. C. Guzman, P. Stadler, André Fujita\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/comnet/cnac040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Estimating the number of eigenvalues $\\\\mu_{[a,b]}$ of a network’s adjacency matrix in a given interval $[a,b]$ is essential in several fields. The straightforward approach consists of calculating all the eigenvalues in $O(n^3)$ (where $n$ is the number of nodes in the network) and then counting the ones that belong to the interval $[a,b]$. Another approach is to use Sylvester’s law of inertia, which also requires $O(n^3)$. Although both methods provide the exact number of eigenvalues in $[a,b]$, their application for large networks is computationally infeasible. Sometimes, an approximation of $\\\\mu_{[a,b]}$ is enough. In this case, Chebyshev’s method approximates $\\\\mu_{[a,b]}$ in $O(|E|)$ (where $|E|$ is the number of edges). This study presents two alternatives to compute $\\\\mu_{[a,b]}$ for locally tree-like networks: edge- and degree-based algorithms. The former presented a better accuracy than Chebyshev’s method. It runs in $O(d|E|)$, where $d$ is the number of iterations. The latter presented slightly lower accuracy but ran linearly ($O(n)$).\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnac040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnac040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficient eigenvalue counts for tree-like networks
Estimating the number of eigenvalues $\mu_{[a,b]}$ of a network’s adjacency matrix in a given interval $[a,b]$ is essential in several fields. The straightforward approach consists of calculating all the eigenvalues in $O(n^3)$ (where $n$ is the number of nodes in the network) and then counting the ones that belong to the interval $[a,b]$. Another approach is to use Sylvester’s law of inertia, which also requires $O(n^3)$. Although both methods provide the exact number of eigenvalues in $[a,b]$, their application for large networks is computationally infeasible. Sometimes, an approximation of $\mu_{[a,b]}$ is enough. In this case, Chebyshev’s method approximates $\mu_{[a,b]}$ in $O(|E|)$ (where $|E|$ is the number of edges). This study presents two alternatives to compute $\mu_{[a,b]}$ for locally tree-like networks: edge- and degree-based algorithms. The former presented a better accuracy than Chebyshev’s method. It runs in $O(d|E|)$, where $d$ is the number of iterations. The latter presented slightly lower accuracy but ran linearly ($O(n)$).