变应性鼻炎患者鼻腔过敏原激发过程中症状评估的综述

A. Zetchi, M. Rousseau, A. Leblanc, M. Boulay, L. Boulet
{"title":"变应性鼻炎患者鼻腔过敏原激发过程中症状评估的综述","authors":"A. Zetchi, M. Rousseau, A. Leblanc, M. Boulay, L. Boulet","doi":"10.2174/1874838401003010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Allergic rhinitis is the most prevalent allergic disease. Nasal provocation tests (NPTs) may be useful for its clinical diagnostic and therapy monitoring although they are mostly used in clinical research. However, the lack of standardisation in the symptoms assessed and the variety of instruments used make effective comparison between studies difficult. Objective: To review the published literature searching for instruments assessing nasal symptoms during NPTs for allergic rhinitis. Methods: Pubmed and Embase electronic databases were reviewed, looking for all methods in- cluding an instrument assessing symptoms during or following NPTs. Studies on animal models, pediatric subjects, and patients without allergic rhinitis were excluded. Studies were also excluded if they did not assess nasal symptoms during or following the NPT. Only NPT studies performed with allergen extracts or histamine were included. Results: A total of 520 studies were retrieved, from which 81 different instruments from 81 studies were included in the present analysis. There was no instrument reporting a validation process for the assessment of symptoms during NPTs. From the remaining instruments, the most common symptoms assessed were rhinorrhea (67), sneezing (70), congestion (67), and nasal pruri- tus (50). The most frequently used type of scales among those instruments was the four-point Likert scale (39), although different methods were used. Conclusions: This review illustrates the large variety of symptoms and methods used to as- sess the aforementioned NPTs. The lack of validation studies suggests the need to develop and validate a standardized in- strument assessing symptoms following NPTs.","PeriodicalId":22835,"journal":{"name":"The Open Allergy Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Symptoms Assessment During Nasal Allergen Provocation in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis\",\"authors\":\"A. Zetchi, M. Rousseau, A. Leblanc, M. Boulay, L. Boulet\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874838401003010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Allergic rhinitis is the most prevalent allergic disease. Nasal provocation tests (NPTs) may be useful for its clinical diagnostic and therapy monitoring although they are mostly used in clinical research. However, the lack of standardisation in the symptoms assessed and the variety of instruments used make effective comparison between studies difficult. Objective: To review the published literature searching for instruments assessing nasal symptoms during NPTs for allergic rhinitis. Methods: Pubmed and Embase electronic databases were reviewed, looking for all methods in- cluding an instrument assessing symptoms during or following NPTs. Studies on animal models, pediatric subjects, and patients without allergic rhinitis were excluded. Studies were also excluded if they did not assess nasal symptoms during or following the NPT. Only NPT studies performed with allergen extracts or histamine were included. Results: A total of 520 studies were retrieved, from which 81 different instruments from 81 studies were included in the present analysis. There was no instrument reporting a validation process for the assessment of symptoms during NPTs. From the remaining instruments, the most common symptoms assessed were rhinorrhea (67), sneezing (70), congestion (67), and nasal pruri- tus (50). The most frequently used type of scales among those instruments was the four-point Likert scale (39), although different methods were used. Conclusions: This review illustrates the large variety of symptoms and methods used to as- sess the aforementioned NPTs. The lack of validation studies suggests the need to develop and validate a standardized in- strument assessing symptoms following NPTs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Allergy Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Allergy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874838401003010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Allergy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874838401003010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:变应性鼻炎是最常见的过敏性疾病。鼻激发试验(NPTs)虽然多用于临床研究,但在临床诊断和治疗监测方面仍有一定的应用价值。然而,缺乏标准化的症状评估和各种工具的使用使得有效比较研究之间的困难。目的:回顾已发表的文献,寻找评估变应性鼻炎npt期间鼻部症状的仪器。方法:回顾Pubmed和Embase电子数据库,寻找所有方法,包括评估npt期间或之后症状的仪器。排除动物模型、儿童受试者和无变应性鼻炎患者的研究。如果研究在NPT期间或之后没有评估鼻腔症状,也被排除在外。仅包括使用过敏原提取物或组胺进行的NPT研究。结果:共检索到520项研究,其中81项研究的81种不同的仪器被纳入本分析。没有仪器报告npt期间症状评估的验证过程。从剩余的仪器中,最常见的症状是鼻漏(67)、打喷嚏(70)、充血(67)和鼻瘙痒(50)。尽管使用了不同的方法,但这些工具中最常用的量表类型是四点李克特量表(39)。结论:这篇综述说明了用于评估上述npt的各种症状和方法。验证性研究的缺乏表明需要开发和验证一种标准化的评估npt后症状的仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review of Symptoms Assessment During Nasal Allergen Provocation in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis
Background: Allergic rhinitis is the most prevalent allergic disease. Nasal provocation tests (NPTs) may be useful for its clinical diagnostic and therapy monitoring although they are mostly used in clinical research. However, the lack of standardisation in the symptoms assessed and the variety of instruments used make effective comparison between studies difficult. Objective: To review the published literature searching for instruments assessing nasal symptoms during NPTs for allergic rhinitis. Methods: Pubmed and Embase electronic databases were reviewed, looking for all methods in- cluding an instrument assessing symptoms during or following NPTs. Studies on animal models, pediatric subjects, and patients without allergic rhinitis were excluded. Studies were also excluded if they did not assess nasal symptoms during or following the NPT. Only NPT studies performed with allergen extracts or histamine were included. Results: A total of 520 studies were retrieved, from which 81 different instruments from 81 studies were included in the present analysis. There was no instrument reporting a validation process for the assessment of symptoms during NPTs. From the remaining instruments, the most common symptoms assessed were rhinorrhea (67), sneezing (70), congestion (67), and nasal pruri- tus (50). The most frequently used type of scales among those instruments was the four-point Likert scale (39), although different methods were used. Conclusions: This review illustrates the large variety of symptoms and methods used to as- sess the aforementioned NPTs. The lack of validation studies suggests the need to develop and validate a standardized in- strument assessing symptoms following NPTs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap Syndrome (ACOS) are Risk Factors for Cryptococcosis Association Between Endoscopic, Radiologic and Patient-reported Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Food Allergy Knowledge and Attitudes Among School Teachers in Jazan, Saudi Arabia Anaphylaxis to Glatiramer Acetate Dynamics of Plasma and Granule Membrane in Murine Bone Marrow- Derived Mast Cells after Re-stimulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1