组织中的倾听:综合和未来议程

IF 14.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Academy of Management Annals Pub Date : 2022-03-15 DOI:10.5465/annals.2020.0367
Jeffrey Yip, C. Fisher
{"title":"组织中的倾听:综合和未来议程","authors":"Jeffrey Yip, C. Fisher","doi":"10.5465/annals.2020.0367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conducted an integrative review of research on listening relevant to work and organizations published from 2000 to 2021 and across three disciplines (management, psychology, and communication studies). We found that listening research is fragmented across three perspectives: (a) perceived listening , (b) the listener ’ s experience and (c) listening structures . We discuss how integrating these perspectives highlights two major tensions in listening research. First, there is a tension between the speaker ’ s perceptions and the listener ’ s experience that reveals a listening paradox — while listening is perceived to be beneficial for speakers, it can be experienced as costly and depleting for listeners. This paradox reveals why people struggle with listening when it is needed the most. Second, listening structures in organizations can create tensions between organizational goals and the listener ’ s experience. While organizations use listening structures to enable and signal listening, these efforts can impose greater costs on listeners, reinforce existing power structures, and create opportunities for unwanted surveillance. Managing these tensions provides fertile ground for future research, in part because recent advances in communication technologies are changing the dynamics and structure of listening in organizations.","PeriodicalId":48333,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Annals","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Listening in Organizations: A Synthesis and Future Agenda\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Yip, C. Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/annals.2020.0367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We conducted an integrative review of research on listening relevant to work and organizations published from 2000 to 2021 and across three disciplines (management, psychology, and communication studies). We found that listening research is fragmented across three perspectives: (a) perceived listening , (b) the listener ’ s experience and (c) listening structures . We discuss how integrating these perspectives highlights two major tensions in listening research. First, there is a tension between the speaker ’ s perceptions and the listener ’ s experience that reveals a listening paradox — while listening is perceived to be beneficial for speakers, it can be experienced as costly and depleting for listeners. This paradox reveals why people struggle with listening when it is needed the most. Second, listening structures in organizations can create tensions between organizational goals and the listener ’ s experience. While organizations use listening structures to enable and signal listening, these efforts can impose greater costs on listeners, reinforce existing power structures, and create opportunities for unwanted surveillance. Managing these tensions provides fertile ground for future research, in part because recent advances in communication technologies are changing the dynamics and structure of listening in organizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academy of Management Annals\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academy of Management Annals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0367\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Annals","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0367","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

我们对2000年至2021年间发表的与工作和组织相关的倾听研究进行了综合回顾,涉及三个学科(管理学、心理学和传播学)。我们发现,听力研究在三个方面是支离破碎的:(a)感知听力,(b)听者的经验和(c)听力结构。我们将讨论如何整合这些观点来突出听力研究中的两个主要紧张关系。首先,说话者的感知和听者的体验之间存在紧张关系,这揭示了一个倾听悖论——虽然倾听被认为对说话者有益,但对听者来说却可能是昂贵和消耗的。这个悖论揭示了为什么人们在最需要倾听的时候却很难倾听。其次,组织中的倾听结构会在组织目标和倾听者的体验之间造成紧张关系。虽然组织使用倾听结构来启用和发出倾听的信号,但这些努力可能会给听众带来更大的成本,加强现有的权力结构,并为不必要的监视创造机会。管理这些紧张关系为未来的研究提供了肥沃的土壤,部分原因是最近通信技术的进步正在改变组织中倾听的动态和结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Listening in Organizations: A Synthesis and Future Agenda
We conducted an integrative review of research on listening relevant to work and organizations published from 2000 to 2021 and across three disciplines (management, psychology, and communication studies). We found that listening research is fragmented across three perspectives: (a) perceived listening , (b) the listener ’ s experience and (c) listening structures . We discuss how integrating these perspectives highlights two major tensions in listening research. First, there is a tension between the speaker ’ s perceptions and the listener ’ s experience that reveals a listening paradox — while listening is perceived to be beneficial for speakers, it can be experienced as costly and depleting for listeners. This paradox reveals why people struggle with listening when it is needed the most. Second, listening structures in organizations can create tensions between organizational goals and the listener ’ s experience. While organizations use listening structures to enable and signal listening, these efforts can impose greater costs on listeners, reinforce existing power structures, and create opportunities for unwanted surveillance. Managing these tensions provides fertile ground for future research, in part because recent advances in communication technologies are changing the dynamics and structure of listening in organizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The mission of the Academy of Management Annals (Annals) is to publish up-to-date, in-depth and integrative reviews of research advances in management. Often called "reviews with an attitude," Annals papers summarize and/or challenge established assumptions and concepts, pinpoint problems and factual errors, inspire discussions, and illuminate possible avenues for further study. Reviews published in Annals move above and beyond descriptions of the field–they motivate conceptual integration and set agendas for future research.
期刊最新文献
Categorizing Concepts and Phenomena in Management Research: A Four-Phase Integrative Review and Recommendations Standardization: Research Trends, Current Debates, and Interdisciplinarity Purpose in Management Research: Navigating a Complex and Fragmented Area of Study Heuristics in Organizations: Toward an Integrative Process Model Understanding How People React to Change: A Domain of Uncertainty Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1