第二语言语法语素的准确顺序:来自不同水平土耳其英语学习者的语料库证据

IF 3.7 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching Pub Date : 2021-12-26 DOI:10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.6
Erdem Akbas, Zeynep Ölçü-Dinçer
{"title":"第二语言语法语素的准确顺序:来自不同水平土耳其英语学习者的语料库证据","authors":"Erdem Akbas, Zeynep Ölçü-Dinçer","doi":"10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study empirically scrutinizes the fixed natural order of grammatical morphemes relying on a manual analysis of an EFL learner corpus. Specifically, we test whether the accuracy order of L2 grammatical morphemes in the case of L1 Turkish speakers of English deviates from Krashen’s (1977) natural order and whether proficiency levels play a role in the order of acquisition of these morphemes. With this in mind, we focus on the (in)accuracy of nine English grammatical morphemes with 2883 cases manually tagged by the UAM Corpus Tool in the written exam scripts of Turkish learners of English. The results based on target-like use scores provide evidence for deviation from what is widely believed to be a set order of acquisition of these grammatical morphemes by second language learners. In light of such findings, we challenge the view that the internally driven processes of mastering grammatical morphemes in English for interlanguage users are largely independent of their L1. Regardless of L2 grammar proficiency in our data, the observed accuracy of some morphemes ranked low in comparison with the so-called natural order. These grammatical morphemes were almost exclusively non-existent features in participants’ mother tongue (e.g., third person singular –s, articles and the irregular past tense forms), thus suggesting the influence of L1 in this respect.","PeriodicalId":46277,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy order in L2 grammatical morphemes: Corpus evidence from different proficiency levels of Turkish learners of English\",\"authors\":\"Erdem Akbas, Zeynep Ölçü-Dinçer\",\"doi\":\"10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study empirically scrutinizes the fixed natural order of grammatical morphemes relying on a manual analysis of an EFL learner corpus. Specifically, we test whether the accuracy order of L2 grammatical morphemes in the case of L1 Turkish speakers of English deviates from Krashen’s (1977) natural order and whether proficiency levels play a role in the order of acquisition of these morphemes. With this in mind, we focus on the (in)accuracy of nine English grammatical morphemes with 2883 cases manually tagged by the UAM Corpus Tool in the written exam scripts of Turkish learners of English. The results based on target-like use scores provide evidence for deviation from what is widely believed to be a set order of acquisition of these grammatical morphemes by second language learners. In light of such findings, we challenge the view that the internally driven processes of mastering grammatical morphemes in English for interlanguage users are largely independent of their L1. Regardless of L2 grammar proficiency in our data, the observed accuracy of some morphemes ranked low in comparison with the so-called natural order. These grammatical morphemes were almost exclusively non-existent features in participants’ mother tongue (e.g., third person singular –s, articles and the irregular past tense forms), thus suggesting the influence of L1 in this respect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究通过对英语学习者语料库的人工分析,实证地考察了语法语素的固定自然顺序。具体来说,我们测试了母语为土耳其语的英语使用者的第二语言语法语素的准确顺序是否偏离了Krashen(1977)的自然顺序,以及熟练程度是否对这些语素的习得顺序起作用。考虑到这一点,我们专注于UAM语料库工具在土耳其英语学习者的笔试脚本中手动标记的2883个案例中的9个英语语法语素的准确性。基于类目标使用分数的结果为第二语言学习者对这些语法语素的习得顺序的偏离提供了证据,人们普遍认为这是第二语言学习者习得这些语法语素的既定顺序。鉴于这些发现,我们挑战了中介语使用者掌握英语语法语素的内在驱动过程在很大程度上独立于他们的母语的观点。不管我们数据中的第二语言语法熟练程度如何,与所谓的自然顺序相比,观察到的一些语素的准确性排名较低。这些语法语素几乎完全是参与者母语中不存在的特征(如第三人称单数-s、冠词和不规则过去时形式),因此表明L1在这方面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy order in L2 grammatical morphemes: Corpus evidence from different proficiency levels of Turkish learners of English
The present study empirically scrutinizes the fixed natural order of grammatical morphemes relying on a manual analysis of an EFL learner corpus. Specifically, we test whether the accuracy order of L2 grammatical morphemes in the case of L1 Turkish speakers of English deviates from Krashen’s (1977) natural order and whether proficiency levels play a role in the order of acquisition of these morphemes. With this in mind, we focus on the (in)accuracy of nine English grammatical morphemes with 2883 cases manually tagged by the UAM Corpus Tool in the written exam scripts of Turkish learners of English. The results based on target-like use scores provide evidence for deviation from what is widely believed to be a set order of acquisition of these grammatical morphemes by second language learners. In light of such findings, we challenge the view that the internally driven processes of mastering grammatical morphemes in English for interlanguage users are largely independent of their L1. Regardless of L2 grammar proficiency in our data, the observed accuracy of some morphemes ranked low in comparison with the so-called natural order. These grammatical morphemes were almost exclusively non-existent features in participants’ mother tongue (e.g., third person singular –s, articles and the irregular past tense forms), thus suggesting the influence of L1 in this respect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching (ISSN 2083-5205) is a refereed journal published four times a year by the Department of English Studies, Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Adam Mickiewicz University, Kalisz, Poland. The language of publication is English. The journal is devoted to reporting previously unpublished highest quality theoretical and empirical research on learning and teaching second and foreign languages. It deals with the learning and teaching of any language, not only English, and focuses on a variety of topics ranging from the processes underlying second language acquisition, various aspects of language learning in instructed and non-instructed settings, as well as different facets of the teaching process, including syllabus choice, materials design, classroom practices and evaluation. Each issue carries about 6 papers, 6000-8000 words in length, as well as reply articles and reviews. At least one of the four issues per year is a special focus issue devoted to a particular area of second language learning and teaching, sometimes with a guest editor who is an expert on a specific topic.
期刊最新文献
Reviewers for Volume 13/2023 Collaboration network of applied linguistics research articles with different methodological orientations Interaction in written texts: A bibliometric study of published research Modeling quality and prestige in applied linguistics journals: A bibliometric and synthetic analysis Introduction to the special issue on Introducing bibliometrics in applied linguistics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1