克服本土和过度自信偏见:基于元分析的私人投资者有效指导

Prof. Sebastian Wenning, PhD, DBA
{"title":"克服本土和过度自信偏见:基于元分析的私人投资者有效指导","authors":"Prof. Sebastian Wenning, PhD, DBA","doi":"10.22158/jepf.v9n1p72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Private investors’ underperformance compared to institutional investors is attributed to a combination of factors, including home bias and overconfidence bias. Home bias refers to the tendency of private investors to overinvest in their domestic markets, which can result in missed opportunities for diversification and exposure to international markets. Institutional investors are less likely to exhibit this bias as they have the resources and expertise to invest globally. Overconfidence bias, on the other hand, refers to private investors’ tendency to believe they have an informational advantage and can outperform the market. This can lead to excessive trading and suboptimal investment decisions. Institutional investors, with their experience and disciplined investment processes, are less likely to fall prey to overconfidence bias. Together, these biases contribute to the underperformance of private investors compared to institutional investors. The following abstract presents four strategies to overcome home- and overconfidence bias derived from the insights of this literature reviewed meta analysis.","PeriodicalId":73718,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economics and public finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming home- and overconfidence bias: an effective guideline for private investors based on meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Prof. Sebastian Wenning, PhD, DBA\",\"doi\":\"10.22158/jepf.v9n1p72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Private investors’ underperformance compared to institutional investors is attributed to a combination of factors, including home bias and overconfidence bias. Home bias refers to the tendency of private investors to overinvest in their domestic markets, which can result in missed opportunities for diversification and exposure to international markets. Institutional investors are less likely to exhibit this bias as they have the resources and expertise to invest globally. Overconfidence bias, on the other hand, refers to private investors’ tendency to believe they have an informational advantage and can outperform the market. This can lead to excessive trading and suboptimal investment decisions. Institutional investors, with their experience and disciplined investment processes, are less likely to fall prey to overconfidence bias. Together, these biases contribute to the underperformance of private investors compared to institutional investors. The following abstract presents four strategies to overcome home- and overconfidence bias derived from the insights of this literature reviewed meta analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of economics and public finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of economics and public finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22158/jepf.v9n1p72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economics and public finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/jepf.v9n1p72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与机构投资者相比,私人投资者的表现不佳是由一系列因素造成的,包括本土偏见和过度自信偏见。本土偏见是指私人投资者在国内市场过度投资的倾向,这可能导致错过多元化和接触国际市场的机会。机构投资者不太可能表现出这种偏见,因为他们拥有全球投资的资源和专业知识。另一方面,过度自信偏见指的是私人投资者倾向于相信他们有信息优势,可以跑赢市场。这可能导致过度交易和次优投资决策。机构投资者拥有丰富的经验和严谨的投资流程,不太可能成为过度自信偏见的牺牲品。总的来说,这些偏见导致了私人投资者与机构投资者相比表现不佳。以下摘要提出了四种策略来克服家庭和过度自信的偏见,这些偏见来自于本文献综述的meta分析的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Overcoming home- and overconfidence bias: an effective guideline for private investors based on meta-analysis
Private investors’ underperformance compared to institutional investors is attributed to a combination of factors, including home bias and overconfidence bias. Home bias refers to the tendency of private investors to overinvest in their domestic markets, which can result in missed opportunities for diversification and exposure to international markets. Institutional investors are less likely to exhibit this bias as they have the resources and expertise to invest globally. Overconfidence bias, on the other hand, refers to private investors’ tendency to believe they have an informational advantage and can outperform the market. This can lead to excessive trading and suboptimal investment decisions. Institutional investors, with their experience and disciplined investment processes, are less likely to fall prey to overconfidence bias. Together, these biases contribute to the underperformance of private investors compared to institutional investors. The following abstract presents four strategies to overcome home- and overconfidence bias derived from the insights of this literature reviewed meta analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Nexus between Profitability, Dividend Policy and Share Prices in Kuwaiti Insurance Companies Corporate Transformation, Income Inequality, and Consumer Commodity Choice: The Economic Cycle in the Rise and Fall of Industries The U.S. Sanitary Pads Market: A Competitive Profile The Economic Implications of China’s Demographic Problems Social Spending and Long-term Economic Performance in the US
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1