这是向你双面发言的一种做法!第一大道的美景第一犹太基督教的苦恼

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses Pub Date : 2009-12-31 DOI:10.2143/ETL.85.4.2044766
B. A. Zimmermann
{"title":"这是向你双面发言的一种做法!第一大道的美景第一犹太基督教的苦恼","authors":"B. A. Zimmermann","doi":"10.2143/ETL.85.4.2044766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consensus between Lutherans and Catholics on some fundamental points of St. Paul's doctrine of justification by faith provoked some polemics, because the significant progress in Christian ecumenism has been achieved at the cost of the Jewish-Christian dialogue, in particular by enhancing the antithesis of faith-works of the law. This article gives some perspectives on Christian theology of justification which pay attention to anti-Jewish implications, and take into account the Jewish-Christian dialogue.","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"23 1","pages":"411-422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wider die Doppelzüngigkeit im ökumenischen Gespräch!: Ökumenische Perspektiven und jüdisch-christliche Irritationen in Sachen Rechtfertigung\",\"authors\":\"B. A. Zimmermann\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/ETL.85.4.2044766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The consensus between Lutherans and Catholics on some fundamental points of St. Paul's doctrine of justification by faith provoked some polemics, because the significant progress in Christian ecumenism has been achieved at the cost of the Jewish-Christian dialogue, in particular by enhancing the antithesis of faith-works of the law. This article gives some perspectives on Christian theology of justification which pay attention to anti-Jewish implications, and take into account the Jewish-Christian dialogue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"411-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.85.4.2044766\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.85.4.2044766","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

路德宗和天主教徒就圣保罗因信称义的教义的一些基本观点达成一致意见,这引起了一些争论,因为基督教合一主义取得的重大进展是以牺牲犹太-基督教对话为代价的,特别是通过加强信仰与律法行为的对立。本文对基督教称义神学提出了一些观点,这些观点关注反犹太人的含义,并考虑到犹太-基督教的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wider die Doppelzüngigkeit im ökumenischen Gespräch!: Ökumenische Perspektiven und jüdisch-christliche Irritationen in Sachen Rechtfertigung
The consensus between Lutherans and Catholics on some fundamental points of St. Paul's doctrine of justification by faith provoked some polemics, because the significant progress in Christian ecumenism has been achieved at the cost of the Jewish-Christian dialogue, in particular by enhancing the antithesis of faith-works of the law. This article gives some perspectives on Christian theology of justification which pay attention to anti-Jewish implications, and take into account the Jewish-Christian dialogue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses (ETL), founded in 1924, is a quarterly publication by professors of Theology and Canon Law at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and the Université catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve). Each volume totals ca. 1300 pages. Issues 1 (April) and 4 (December) contain articles, book reviews and chronicles in various languages (English, French, German). Issue 2-3 (September) represents the annual Elenchus Bibliographicus, an extensive bibliography of books and articles that appeared during the preceding year. The bibliography (ca. 15,000 entries) covers the entire field of Theology and Canon Law: History of Theology, History of Religions.
期刊最新文献
Returning to Mark 16, 8: What's new? Anastasius of Sinai and His Participation in the Monothelite Controversy Alternation between Aorist, Historical Present and Imperfect: Aspects of Markan Narrative Style The Sayings Gospel Q in Marcion’s Edition of Luke Phonemes, words and sentences, and the Buddhist unconditioned
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1