积极的重新评估作为COVID-19大流行期间的压力应对策略

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Salud Mental Pub Date : 2021-08-30 DOI:10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2021.023
J. Varela, C. D. L. C. L. Cruz, Jessica Giselle Leija Guerrero, Karen Estefanía Sánchez Rodríguez, Omar Kawas Valle
{"title":"积极的重新评估作为COVID-19大流行期间的压力应对策略","authors":"J. Varela, C. D. L. C. L. Cruz, Jessica Giselle Leija Guerrero, Karen Estefanía Sánchez Rodríguez, Omar Kawas Valle","doi":"10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2021.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The stress coping strategies people rely on impact their psychological well-being and may be related to the risk of developing psychopathology in the short- and long-term after an unfortunate event. Objective. To define the main stress coping strategies in our region as a first step in assessing the risk of developing psychopathology derived from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Method. This is an observational, cross-sectional, analytical study that includes 396 participants over 18 years of age residents of the state of Nuevo Leon. Using an online form, the participants were asked to complete the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CAE). Results. In general, after two months of mitigation measures in Mexico, positive reappraisal was the stress coping strategy with the highest score in the population studied. We found higher scores on negative auto-focused and overt emotional expression on the comparation between sociodemographic subgroups. Discussion and conclusion. The present study shows that, in our community, positive reappraisal was the stress coping strategy with the highest score. Positive reappraisal is an active form of coping associated with greater psychological well-being and fewer risk of developing psychopathology in the short and long term. Based on this, our hypothesis is that the predominant use of this strategy could translate into a higher psychological well-being during and after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the studied sample.","PeriodicalId":46510,"journal":{"name":"Salud Mental","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positive reappraisal as a stress coping strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"J. Varela, C. D. L. C. L. Cruz, Jessica Giselle Leija Guerrero, Karen Estefanía Sánchez Rodríguez, Omar Kawas Valle\",\"doi\":\"10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2021.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The stress coping strategies people rely on impact their psychological well-being and may be related to the risk of developing psychopathology in the short- and long-term after an unfortunate event. Objective. To define the main stress coping strategies in our region as a first step in assessing the risk of developing psychopathology derived from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Method. This is an observational, cross-sectional, analytical study that includes 396 participants over 18 years of age residents of the state of Nuevo Leon. Using an online form, the participants were asked to complete the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CAE). Results. In general, after two months of mitigation measures in Mexico, positive reappraisal was the stress coping strategy with the highest score in the population studied. We found higher scores on negative auto-focused and overt emotional expression on the comparation between sociodemographic subgroups. Discussion and conclusion. The present study shows that, in our community, positive reappraisal was the stress coping strategy with the highest score. Positive reappraisal is an active form of coping associated with greater psychological well-being and fewer risk of developing psychopathology in the short and long term. Based on this, our hypothesis is that the predominant use of this strategy could translate into a higher psychological well-being during and after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the studied sample.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Salud Mental\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Salud Mental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2021.023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Mental","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2021.023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

介绍。人们所依赖的压力应对策略会影响他们的心理健康,并可能与不幸事件发生后短期和长期发生精神病理的风险有关。目标。确定本地区主要的压力应对策略,作为评估SARS-CoV-2大流行引发的精神病理学风险的第一步。方法。这是一项观察性、横断面性、分析性研究,包括396名18岁以上的新莱昂州居民。使用在线表格,参与者被要求完成应对策略问卷(CAE)。结果。总体而言,在墨西哥采取了两个月的缓解措施后,积极的重新评价是所研究人口中得分最高的压力应对策略。我们发现在社会人口亚组之间的比较中,消极的自动聚焦和公开的情绪表达得分更高。讨论与结论。本研究表明,在我们的社区中,积极的重评价是得分最高的压力应对策略。积极的重新评价是一种积极的应对形式,与更大的心理健康和更少的短期和长期发展精神病理的风险有关。基于此,我们的假设是,在研究样本中,这种策略的主要使用可以在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间和之后转化为更高的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Positive reappraisal as a stress coping strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic
Introduction. The stress coping strategies people rely on impact their psychological well-being and may be related to the risk of developing psychopathology in the short- and long-term after an unfortunate event. Objective. To define the main stress coping strategies in our region as a first step in assessing the risk of developing psychopathology derived from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Method. This is an observational, cross-sectional, analytical study that includes 396 participants over 18 years of age residents of the state of Nuevo Leon. Using an online form, the participants were asked to complete the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CAE). Results. In general, after two months of mitigation measures in Mexico, positive reappraisal was the stress coping strategy with the highest score in the population studied. We found higher scores on negative auto-focused and overt emotional expression on the comparation between sociodemographic subgroups. Discussion and conclusion. The present study shows that, in our community, positive reappraisal was the stress coping strategy with the highest score. Positive reappraisal is an active form of coping associated with greater psychological well-being and fewer risk of developing psychopathology in the short and long term. Based on this, our hypothesis is that the predominant use of this strategy could translate into a higher psychological well-being during and after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the studied sample.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Salud Mental
Salud Mental PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Salud Mental receives original manuscripts dealing with various mental health-related topics (such as psychiatry, neurosciences, psychology, epidemiology, and addictions). The submission of a manuscript must be exclusively carried out through this website.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of suicide mortality in Mexican young people (ages 15-29) from 1990 to 2020 Mexico at the United Nations: A step forward for mental health Clinical practice stressors and anxiety in nursing students during COVID-19 Emotional distress and self-care during the COVID-19 pandemic in women from an indigenous migrant cultural collective in Mexico City Is there interest of Mexican adults in being prepared should they develop Alzheimer’s or other dementia?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1