E. Cosgrave, A. Sheridan, E. Murphy, M. Blake, Rikke Siersbaek, Sarah Parker, S. Burke, F. Doyle, P. Kavanagh
{"title":"公众对在爱尔兰戒烟服务中实施财政激励的态度","authors":"E. Cosgrave, A. Sheridan, E. Murphy, M. Blake, Rikke Siersbaek, Sarah Parker, S. Burke, F. Doyle, P. Kavanagh","doi":"10.1101/2023.01.13.23284530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Financial incentives improve stop smoking service outcomes. Views on acceptability can influence implementation success. To inform implementation planning in Ireland, public attitudes to financial incentives in stop smoking services were measured. METHODS: A cross-sectional telephone survey was administered to a random digit dialled sample of 1000 people in Ireland aged 15 years and older in 2022. The questionnaire included items on support for financial incentives under different conditions. Prevalence of support was calculated with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) and multiple logistic regression identified associated factors using Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs, with 95% CIs). RESULTS: Almost half (47.0%, 95% CI 43.9%-50.1%) supported at least one type of financial incentive to stop smoking, with support more prevalent for shopping vouchers (43.3%, 95% CI 40.3%-46.5%) than cash payments (32.1%, 95% CI 29.2%-35.0%). Support was similar for universal and income-restricted schemes. Of those who supported financial incentives, the majority (60.6%) believed the maximum amount given on proof of stopping smoking should be under euro250 (median=euro100, range=euro1-euro7000). Versus comparative counterparts, those of lower educational attainment (aOR 1.49 95% CI 1.10-2.03, p=0.010) and tobacco/e-cigarette users (aOR 1.43 95% CI 1.02-2.03, p=0.041) were significantly more likely to support either financial incentive type, as were younger people. CONCLUSIONS: While views on financial incentives to stop smoking in Ireland were mixed, the intervention is more acceptable in groups experiencing the heaviest burden of smoking-related harm and most capacity to benefit. Engagement and communication must be integral to planning for successful implementation to improve stop smoking service outcomes.","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public attitudes to implementing financial incentives in stopsmoking services in Ireland\",\"authors\":\"E. Cosgrave, A. Sheridan, E. Murphy, M. Blake, Rikke Siersbaek, Sarah Parker, S. Burke, F. Doyle, P. Kavanagh\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.01.13.23284530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Financial incentives improve stop smoking service outcomes. Views on acceptability can influence implementation success. To inform implementation planning in Ireland, public attitudes to financial incentives in stop smoking services were measured. METHODS: A cross-sectional telephone survey was administered to a random digit dialled sample of 1000 people in Ireland aged 15 years and older in 2022. The questionnaire included items on support for financial incentives under different conditions. Prevalence of support was calculated with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) and multiple logistic regression identified associated factors using Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs, with 95% CIs). RESULTS: Almost half (47.0%, 95% CI 43.9%-50.1%) supported at least one type of financial incentive to stop smoking, with support more prevalent for shopping vouchers (43.3%, 95% CI 40.3%-46.5%) than cash payments (32.1%, 95% CI 29.2%-35.0%). Support was similar for universal and income-restricted schemes. Of those who supported financial incentives, the majority (60.6%) believed the maximum amount given on proof of stopping smoking should be under euro250 (median=euro100, range=euro1-euro7000). Versus comparative counterparts, those of lower educational attainment (aOR 1.49 95% CI 1.10-2.03, p=0.010) and tobacco/e-cigarette users (aOR 1.43 95% CI 1.02-2.03, p=0.041) were significantly more likely to support either financial incentive type, as were younger people. CONCLUSIONS: While views on financial incentives to stop smoking in Ireland were mixed, the intervention is more acceptable in groups experiencing the heaviest burden of smoking-related harm and most capacity to benefit. Engagement and communication must be integral to planning for successful implementation to improve stop smoking service outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.13.23284530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.13.23284530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言:财政激励可以改善戒烟服务的效果。对可接受性的看法会影响实现的成功。为了向爱尔兰的实施计划提供信息,我们测量了公众对戒烟服务中财政激励措施的态度。方法:对2022年爱尔兰15岁及以上的1000名随机数字拨号样本进行横断面电话调查。问卷包括在不同情况下支持财政奖励的项目。采用95%置信区间(CIs)计算支持率,并采用调整优势比(aORs, 95% ci)进行多元logistic回归,确定相关因素。结果:几乎一半(47.0%,95% CI 43.9%-50.1%)的人支持至少一种财务激励戒烟,其中购物券(43.3%,95% CI 40.3%-46.5%)比现金支付(32.1%,95% CI 29.2%-35.0%)更受欢迎。对普遍计划和收入限制计划的支持情况类似。在那些支持财政奖励的人中,大多数(60.6%)认为戒烟证明的最高金额应低于250欧元(中位数= 100欧元,范围= 1- 7000欧元)。与比较对象相比,那些受教育程度较低的人(aOR 1.49 95% CI 1.10-2.03, p=0.010)和烟草/电子烟使用者(aOR 1.43 95% CI 1.02-2.03, p=0.041)与年轻人一样,更有可能支持任何一种经济激励类型。结论:尽管对爱尔兰戒烟财政激励的看法不一,但在经历吸烟相关危害负担最重、获益能力最强的群体中,这种干预更容易被接受。参与和沟通必须成为成功实施计划的组成部分,以改善戒烟服务的成果。
Public attitudes to implementing financial incentives in stopsmoking services in Ireland
INTRODUCTION: Financial incentives improve stop smoking service outcomes. Views on acceptability can influence implementation success. To inform implementation planning in Ireland, public attitudes to financial incentives in stop smoking services were measured. METHODS: A cross-sectional telephone survey was administered to a random digit dialled sample of 1000 people in Ireland aged 15 years and older in 2022. The questionnaire included items on support for financial incentives under different conditions. Prevalence of support was calculated with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) and multiple logistic regression identified associated factors using Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs, with 95% CIs). RESULTS: Almost half (47.0%, 95% CI 43.9%-50.1%) supported at least one type of financial incentive to stop smoking, with support more prevalent for shopping vouchers (43.3%, 95% CI 40.3%-46.5%) than cash payments (32.1%, 95% CI 29.2%-35.0%). Support was similar for universal and income-restricted schemes. Of those who supported financial incentives, the majority (60.6%) believed the maximum amount given on proof of stopping smoking should be under euro250 (median=euro100, range=euro1-euro7000). Versus comparative counterparts, those of lower educational attainment (aOR 1.49 95% CI 1.10-2.03, p=0.010) and tobacco/e-cigarette users (aOR 1.43 95% CI 1.02-2.03, p=0.041) were significantly more likely to support either financial incentive type, as were younger people. CONCLUSIONS: While views on financial incentives to stop smoking in Ireland were mixed, the intervention is more acceptable in groups experiencing the heaviest burden of smoking-related harm and most capacity to benefit. Engagement and communication must be integral to planning for successful implementation to improve stop smoking service outcomes.