J. Spaeth, M. Ott, W. Karzai, A. Grimm, S. Wirth, Stefan Schumann, T. Loop
{"title":"单肺通气时双腔管和自动peep。","authors":"J. Spaeth, M. Ott, W. Karzai, A. Grimm, S. Wirth, Stefan Schumann, T. Loop","doi":"10.1097/01.sa.0000490231.29771.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nDouble-lumen tubes (DLT) are routinely used to enable one-lung-ventilation (OLV) during thoracic anaesthesia. The flow-dependent resistance of the DLT's bronchial limb may be high as a result of its narrow inner diameter and length, and thus potentially contribute to an unintended increase in positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP). We therefore studied the impact of adult sized DLTs on the dynamic auto-PEEP during OLV.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn this prospective clinical study, dynamic auto-PEEP was determined in 72 patients undergoing thoracic surgery, with right- and left-sided DLTs of various sizes. During OLV, air trapping was provoked by increasing inspiration to expiration ratio from 1:2 to 2:1 (five steps). Based on measured flow rate, airway pressure (Paw) and bronchial pressure (Pbronch), the pressure gradient across the DLT (ΔPDLT) and the total auto-PEEP in the respiratory system (i.e. the lungs, the DLT and the ventilator circuit) were determined. Subsequently the DLT's share in total auto-PEEP was calculated.\n\n\nRESULTS\nΔPDLT was 2.3 (0.7) cm H2O over the entire breathing cycle. At the shortest expiratory time the mean total auto-PEEP was 2.9 (1.5) cm H2O (range 0-5.9 cm H2O). The DLT caused 27 to 31% of the total auto-PEEP. Size and side of the DLT's bronchial limb did not impact auto-PEEP significantly.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAlthough the DLT contributes to the overall auto-PEEP, its contribution is small and independent of size and side of the DLT's bronchial limb. The choice of DLT does not influence the risk of auto-PEEP during OLV to a clinically relevant extent.\n\n\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION\nDRKS00005648.","PeriodicalId":22104,"journal":{"name":"Survey of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double-lumen tubes and auto-PEEP during one-lung ventilation.\",\"authors\":\"J. Spaeth, M. Ott, W. Karzai, A. Grimm, S. Wirth, Stefan Schumann, T. Loop\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.sa.0000490231.29771.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nDouble-lumen tubes (DLT) are routinely used to enable one-lung-ventilation (OLV) during thoracic anaesthesia. The flow-dependent resistance of the DLT's bronchial limb may be high as a result of its narrow inner diameter and length, and thus potentially contribute to an unintended increase in positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP). We therefore studied the impact of adult sized DLTs on the dynamic auto-PEEP during OLV.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nIn this prospective clinical study, dynamic auto-PEEP was determined in 72 patients undergoing thoracic surgery, with right- and left-sided DLTs of various sizes. During OLV, air trapping was provoked by increasing inspiration to expiration ratio from 1:2 to 2:1 (five steps). Based on measured flow rate, airway pressure (Paw) and bronchial pressure (Pbronch), the pressure gradient across the DLT (ΔPDLT) and the total auto-PEEP in the respiratory system (i.e. the lungs, the DLT and the ventilator circuit) were determined. Subsequently the DLT's share in total auto-PEEP was calculated.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nΔPDLT was 2.3 (0.7) cm H2O over the entire breathing cycle. At the shortest expiratory time the mean total auto-PEEP was 2.9 (1.5) cm H2O (range 0-5.9 cm H2O). The DLT caused 27 to 31% of the total auto-PEEP. Size and side of the DLT's bronchial limb did not impact auto-PEEP significantly.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nAlthough the DLT contributes to the overall auto-PEEP, its contribution is small and independent of size and side of the DLT's bronchial limb. The choice of DLT does not influence the risk of auto-PEEP during OLV to a clinically relevant extent.\\n\\n\\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION\\nDRKS00005648.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000490231.29771.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000490231.29771.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
背景:在胸部麻醉期间,双腔管(DLT)通常用于实现单肺通气(OLV)。由于DLT的内径和长度较窄,其支气管肢体的血流依赖性阻力可能很高,因此可能导致呼气末正压(自动peep)的意外增加。因此,我们研究了成人大小的dlt对OLV期间动态自动peep的影响。方法在这项前瞻性临床研究中,对72例胸外科手术患者进行动态自动peep测定,这些患者有不同大小的左右侧dlt。在OLV过程中,通过将吸气与呼气比从1:2增加到2:1(五个步骤)来引起空气捕获。根据测量的流速、气道压力(Paw)和支气管压力(phbronch),确定DLT上的压力梯度(ΔPDLT)和呼吸系统(即肺、DLT和呼吸机回路)的总自动peep。随后计算DLT在总自动peep中的份额。RESULTSΔPDLT在整个呼吸周期中为2.3 (0.7)cm H2O。在最短呼气时间,平均总自动peep为2.9 (1.5)cm H2O(范围0-5.9 cm H2O)。DLT引起了总自动peep的27 - 31%。DLT支气管肢体的大小和侧边对自动peep无明显影响。结论虽然DLT对整体的自动peep有贡献,但其贡献较小,且与DLT支气管肢的大小和侧边无关。在临床相关程度上,DLT的选择并未影响OLV期间的自peep风险。临床试验注册drks00005648。
Double-lumen tubes and auto-PEEP during one-lung ventilation.
BACKGROUND
Double-lumen tubes (DLT) are routinely used to enable one-lung-ventilation (OLV) during thoracic anaesthesia. The flow-dependent resistance of the DLT's bronchial limb may be high as a result of its narrow inner diameter and length, and thus potentially contribute to an unintended increase in positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP). We therefore studied the impact of adult sized DLTs on the dynamic auto-PEEP during OLV.
METHODS
In this prospective clinical study, dynamic auto-PEEP was determined in 72 patients undergoing thoracic surgery, with right- and left-sided DLTs of various sizes. During OLV, air trapping was provoked by increasing inspiration to expiration ratio from 1:2 to 2:1 (five steps). Based on measured flow rate, airway pressure (Paw) and bronchial pressure (Pbronch), the pressure gradient across the DLT (ΔPDLT) and the total auto-PEEP in the respiratory system (i.e. the lungs, the DLT and the ventilator circuit) were determined. Subsequently the DLT's share in total auto-PEEP was calculated.
RESULTS
ΔPDLT was 2.3 (0.7) cm H2O over the entire breathing cycle. At the shortest expiratory time the mean total auto-PEEP was 2.9 (1.5) cm H2O (range 0-5.9 cm H2O). The DLT caused 27 to 31% of the total auto-PEEP. Size and side of the DLT's bronchial limb did not impact auto-PEEP significantly.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the DLT contributes to the overall auto-PEEP, its contribution is small and independent of size and side of the DLT's bronchial limb. The choice of DLT does not influence the risk of auto-PEEP during OLV to a clinically relevant extent.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
DRKS00005648.