耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株暴露后的吞噬细胞活性

O. Kolenchukova, V. D. Belenuk
{"title":"耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株暴露后的吞噬细胞活性","authors":"O. Kolenchukova, V. D. Belenuk","doi":"10.37489/0235-2990-2022-67-1-2-4-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research focuses on the study of phagocyte activity of blood neutrophilic granulocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils under the exposure to methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. The subjects of the research were represented by blood neutrophilic granulocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils, isolated from healthy people, as well as methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive S.aureus bacteria strains  (MRSA and MSSA). Phagocytosis functions (phagocytic number and phagocytic index)  were estimated by FITC-labeled bacteria. The analysis of stained cells was performed using  FC-500 flow cytofluorimeter (Beckman Coulter,  USA) for whole  peripheral blood. Phagocytosis research  resulted in the following findings. In response to MRSA, the percentage of neutrophils involved in phagocytosis and average  number of bacteria being  present inside the cells  increase as compared to those within  sensitive strains. In response to MRSA exposure, the phagocytic index  is higher  in monocytes with CD14+CD16¯phenotype. At the same time, phagocytic number is higher in non-classic populations of monocytes CD14+CD16+and CD14lowCD16+. Moreover, it should be noted that the classical type of monocytes CD14+CD16¯tends to be activated faster in regard to MRSA, but phagocytosis efficiency is lowered. Blood eosinophils also actively respond to MRSA. Thus, changes in functional activity of neutrophilic granulocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils in peripheral blood were established during MRSA induction. The bacterial receptor apparatus changes due to the modification of cellular wall as a result of acquired resistance to antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":8471,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics and Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phagocyte Activity in Response to Exposure to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains\",\"authors\":\"O. Kolenchukova, V. D. Belenuk\",\"doi\":\"10.37489/0235-2990-2022-67-1-2-4-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research focuses on the study of phagocyte activity of blood neutrophilic granulocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils under the exposure to methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. The subjects of the research were represented by blood neutrophilic granulocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils, isolated from healthy people, as well as methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive S.aureus bacteria strains  (MRSA and MSSA). Phagocytosis functions (phagocytic number and phagocytic index)  were estimated by FITC-labeled bacteria. The analysis of stained cells was performed using  FC-500 flow cytofluorimeter (Beckman Coulter,  USA) for whole  peripheral blood. Phagocytosis research  resulted in the following findings. In response to MRSA, the percentage of neutrophils involved in phagocytosis and average  number of bacteria being  present inside the cells  increase as compared to those within  sensitive strains. In response to MRSA exposure, the phagocytic index  is higher  in monocytes with CD14+CD16¯phenotype. At the same time, phagocytic number is higher in non-classic populations of monocytes CD14+CD16+and CD14lowCD16+. Moreover, it should be noted that the classical type of monocytes CD14+CD16¯tends to be activated faster in regard to MRSA, but phagocytosis efficiency is lowered. Blood eosinophils also actively respond to MRSA. Thus, changes in functional activity of neutrophilic granulocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils in peripheral blood were established during MRSA induction. The bacterial receptor apparatus changes due to the modification of cellular wall as a result of acquired resistance to antibiotics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2022-67-1-2-4-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2022-67-1-2-4-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是研究耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株暴露下血液中性粒细胞、单核细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞的吞噬活性。研究对象为健康人群分离的血液中性粒细胞、单核细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞,以及耐甲氧西林和敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株(MRSA和MSSA)。通过fitc标记的细菌估计其吞噬功能(吞噬数和吞噬指数)。全外周血用FC-500流式细胞荧光仪(Beckman Coulter, USA)对染色细胞进行分析。吞噬作用的研究结果如下。在对MRSA的反应中,与敏感菌株相比,参与吞噬的中性粒细胞的百分比和存在于细胞内的细菌的平均数量增加。在MRSA暴露下,CD14+CD16¯表型的单核细胞的吞噬指数更高。同时,CD14+CD16+和CD14lowCD16+单核细胞非经典群体的吞噬数量较高。此外,值得注意的是,经典类型的单核细胞CD14+CD16¯在MRSA中往往被更快地激活,但吞噬效率降低。血嗜酸性粒细胞也对MRSA有积极反应。因此,在MRSA诱导过程中,外周血中性粒细胞、单核细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞的功能活性发生了变化。由于获得性抗生素耐药性,细菌的细胞壁发生了修饰,从而导致了受体装置的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Phagocyte Activity in Response to Exposure to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains
The research focuses on the study of phagocyte activity of blood neutrophilic granulocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils under the exposure to methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. The subjects of the research were represented by blood neutrophilic granulocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils, isolated from healthy people, as well as methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive S.aureus bacteria strains  (MRSA and MSSA). Phagocytosis functions (phagocytic number and phagocytic index)  were estimated by FITC-labeled bacteria. The analysis of stained cells was performed using  FC-500 flow cytofluorimeter (Beckman Coulter,  USA) for whole  peripheral blood. Phagocytosis research  resulted in the following findings. In response to MRSA, the percentage of neutrophils involved in phagocytosis and average  number of bacteria being  present inside the cells  increase as compared to those within  sensitive strains. In response to MRSA exposure, the phagocytic index  is higher  in monocytes with CD14+CD16¯phenotype. At the same time, phagocytic number is higher in non-classic populations of monocytes CD14+CD16+and CD14lowCD16+. Moreover, it should be noted that the classical type of monocytes CD14+CD16¯tends to be activated faster in regard to MRSA, but phagocytosis efficiency is lowered. Blood eosinophils also actively respond to MRSA. Thus, changes in functional activity of neutrophilic granulocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils in peripheral blood were established during MRSA induction. The bacterial receptor apparatus changes due to the modification of cellular wall as a result of acquired resistance to antibiotics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the Protective Activity of Thymogen® Dosed Nasal Spray on a Model of Experimental Influenza Pneumonia in Laboratory Animals New Approaches to Etiotropic Therapy of ARVI Patients with Riamilovir Predictors of the Effectiveness of Psychological Support in Addition to the Base Treatment in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Present Strategy and Tactics of Antibacterial Therapy for Hospital Infections: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic Antimicrobial Resistance in Sexually Transmitted Infections: Current Trends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1