从动物考古学的角度看青铜时代亚洲的中央集权

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Mediterranean Archaeology & Archaeometry Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.5281/ZENODO.824731
Stella Macheridis
{"title":"从动物考古学的角度看青铜时代亚洲的中央集权","authors":"Stella Macheridis","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.824731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From at least the Late Neolithic through the end of the Bronze Age and onwards, people continued to inhabit the settlement of Asine. For this reason, the site makes an interesting starting point for discussing long term change. This short paper presents new data on the animal bones from Bronze Age Asine. The data set is used for a zooarchaeological discussion of the site from a diachronic perspective in terms of centralization and regional change. This has not been attempted previously. Zooarchaeological patterns from urban or central sites in other parts of the world are compiled as a framework for this purpose. The focus is on patterns of relative taxonomic abundances, anatomical distribution, mortality curves and sex distributions of cattle, sheep/goat and pigs. These are examined specifically for the animal bone assemblage from Bronze Age Asine. Differences and/or similarities with the general trends indicative of centralization are discussed for the study site. The results show that the Early Helladic Asine should be seen as a smaller rural site. The even relative abundances of cattle, sheep, goat and pigs indicate that the animal management was not specialized but rather mixed, pointing the site was relatively independent in terms of animal management. The increase in sheep/goat during the Middle Helladic indicates an increasing dependency on animals yielding secondary products, symptomatic of regional and centralized organization. This supports the archaeological evidence of the site, indicating that it was an important village to its immediate valley during this period. This function persisted during the Late Bronze Age. From a zooarchaeological perspective, it is not likely that Asine was a regional center. Some degree of sustainable animal management was probably existent near or at the site. I propose that Asine should be seen as an intermediary key site in the communication system as well as for the exchange of animals.","PeriodicalId":46130,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Archaeology & Archaeometry","volume":"18 1","pages":"159-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Centralization at Asine during the Bronze Age from a zooarchaeological perspective\",\"authors\":\"Stella Macheridis\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.824731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From at least the Late Neolithic through the end of the Bronze Age and onwards, people continued to inhabit the settlement of Asine. For this reason, the site makes an interesting starting point for discussing long term change. This short paper presents new data on the animal bones from Bronze Age Asine. The data set is used for a zooarchaeological discussion of the site from a diachronic perspective in terms of centralization and regional change. This has not been attempted previously. Zooarchaeological patterns from urban or central sites in other parts of the world are compiled as a framework for this purpose. The focus is on patterns of relative taxonomic abundances, anatomical distribution, mortality curves and sex distributions of cattle, sheep/goat and pigs. These are examined specifically for the animal bone assemblage from Bronze Age Asine. Differences and/or similarities with the general trends indicative of centralization are discussed for the study site. The results show that the Early Helladic Asine should be seen as a smaller rural site. The even relative abundances of cattle, sheep, goat and pigs indicate that the animal management was not specialized but rather mixed, pointing the site was relatively independent in terms of animal management. The increase in sheep/goat during the Middle Helladic indicates an increasing dependency on animals yielding secondary products, symptomatic of regional and centralized organization. This supports the archaeological evidence of the site, indicating that it was an important village to its immediate valley during this period. This function persisted during the Late Bronze Age. From a zooarchaeological perspective, it is not likely that Asine was a regional center. Some degree of sustainable animal management was probably existent near or at the site. I propose that Asine should be seen as an intermediary key site in the communication system as well as for the exchange of animals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediterranean Archaeology & Archaeometry\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"159-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediterranean Archaeology & Archaeometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.824731\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Archaeology & Archaeometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.824731","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

至少从新石器时代晚期到青铜时代末期及以后,人们继续居住在亚洲的定居点。出于这个原因,该站点为讨论长期变化提供了一个有趣的起点。这篇短文介绍了有关青铜时代亚洲动物骨骼的新数据。该数据集用于从集中化和区域变化的历时性角度对该遗址进行动物考古学讨论。这是以前没有尝试过的。世界其他地区的城市或中心遗址的动物考古模式被汇编为为此目的的框架。重点是牛、绵羊/山羊和猪的相对分类丰度、解剖分布、死亡率曲线和性别分布模式。这些是专门为青铜时代亚洲的动物骨骼组合进行检查的。讨论了研究地点与指示集中化的一般趋势的差异和/或相似之处。结果表明,早期希腊亚洲应该被视为一个较小的农村遗址。牛、羊、山羊和猪的相对丰度均匀,表明该遗址的动物管理不是专业化的,而是混合的,表明该遗址在动物管理方面相对独立。中希腊时期绵羊/山羊数量的增加表明人们越来越依赖于生产次要产品的动物,这是区域和集中组织的症状。这支持了该遗址的考古证据,表明在这一时期,它是与其紧邻的山谷的一个重要村庄。这种功能一直延续到青铜时代晚期。从动物考古学的角度来看,亚洲不太可能是一个区域中心。该遗址附近或附近可能存在一定程度的可持续动物管理。我建议亚洲应该被看作是交流系统和动物交换的一个中介关键站点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Centralization at Asine during the Bronze Age from a zooarchaeological perspective
From at least the Late Neolithic through the end of the Bronze Age and onwards, people continued to inhabit the settlement of Asine. For this reason, the site makes an interesting starting point for discussing long term change. This short paper presents new data on the animal bones from Bronze Age Asine. The data set is used for a zooarchaeological discussion of the site from a diachronic perspective in terms of centralization and regional change. This has not been attempted previously. Zooarchaeological patterns from urban or central sites in other parts of the world are compiled as a framework for this purpose. The focus is on patterns of relative taxonomic abundances, anatomical distribution, mortality curves and sex distributions of cattle, sheep/goat and pigs. These are examined specifically for the animal bone assemblage from Bronze Age Asine. Differences and/or similarities with the general trends indicative of centralization are discussed for the study site. The results show that the Early Helladic Asine should be seen as a smaller rural site. The even relative abundances of cattle, sheep, goat and pigs indicate that the animal management was not specialized but rather mixed, pointing the site was relatively independent in terms of animal management. The increase in sheep/goat during the Middle Helladic indicates an increasing dependency on animals yielding secondary products, symptomatic of regional and centralized organization. This supports the archaeological evidence of the site, indicating that it was an important village to its immediate valley during this period. This function persisted during the Late Bronze Age. From a zooarchaeological perspective, it is not likely that Asine was a regional center. Some degree of sustainable animal management was probably existent near or at the site. I propose that Asine should be seen as an intermediary key site in the communication system as well as for the exchange of animals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry (MAA) is an Open Access Journal that covers the following interdisciplinary topics: 1. Natural Sciences applied to Archaeology (Archaeometry): Methods and Techniques of Dating, Analysis, Provenance, Archaeogeophysical surveys and Remote Sensing, Geochemical surveys, Statistics, Artifact and Conservation studies, Ancient Astronomy of both the Old and New Worlds, all applied to Archaeology, History of Art, and in general the Hominid Biological and Cultural evolution. 2. Biomolecular Archaeology. 3. Environmental Archaeology. 4. Osteoarchaeology. 5. Digital Archaeology. 6. Palaeo-climatological/geographical/ecological impact on ancient humans. 7. STEMAC (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics in Art and Culture). 8. Reports on Early Science and Ancient Technology. 9. Special Issues on Archaeology and Archaeometry. 10. Palaeolithic, Prehistoric, Classical, Hellenistic, Roman, Protochristian, Byzantine, Etruscan periods, and Megalithic cultures in the Mediterranean region. 11. Egyptian and Middle Eastern Archaeology. 12. Biblical Archaeology. 13. Early Arab cultures. 14. Ethnoarchaeology. 15. Theoretical and Experimental Archaeology. 16. Mythology and Archaeology. 17. Archaeology and International Law. 18. Cultural Heritage Management. 19. Completed Excavation Reports. 20. Archaeology and the Origins of Writing. 21. Cultural interactions of the ancient Mediterraneans with people further inland.
期刊最新文献
Archaeometric analysis of Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age pottery from Setefilla (SW Spain) Roman land division in Istria, Croatia: historiography, LIDAR, structural survey and excavations PANDEMICS - FROM ANCIENT TIMES TO COVID19 SOME THOUGHTS Aristotle, King David, King Zhou and Pharao Thutmosis III have seen comet Encke Evaluation of Mallorca Cathedral seismic behavior using different analysis techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1