未来投资者-国家争端解决中的调解

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Journal of International Dispute Settlement Pub Date : 2022-07-12 DOI:10.1093/jnlids/idac015
Catherine Kessedjian, Anne van Aaken, R. Lie, L. Mistelis, José Maria Reis
{"title":"未来投资者-国家争端解决中的调解","authors":"Catherine Kessedjian, Anne van Aaken, R. Lie, L. Mistelis, José Maria Reis","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idac015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Mediation is an intensely discussed topic as a possibly promising venue for investor–State dispute settlement (ISDS) and conflict prevention. Given that mediation can be used within ‘cooling-off’ (amicable settlement) periods in International Investment Agreements, this article takes stock of those as well as explicit mediation rules which are on the rise in new IIAs. It draws lessons from the small amount of known cases which went to mediation and presents business view on mediation. It also draws a list of common obstacles for business and states preventing the use of mediation in the investor–State context. Finally, this article attempts to map future work which could be useful in the context of UNCITRAL negotiations towards the reform of ISDS.","PeriodicalId":44660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mediation in Future Investor–State Dispute Settlement\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Kessedjian, Anne van Aaken, R. Lie, L. Mistelis, José Maria Reis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnlids/idac015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Mediation is an intensely discussed topic as a possibly promising venue for investor–State dispute settlement (ISDS) and conflict prevention. Given that mediation can be used within ‘cooling-off’ (amicable settlement) periods in International Investment Agreements, this article takes stock of those as well as explicit mediation rules which are on the rise in new IIAs. It draws lessons from the small amount of known cases which went to mediation and presents business view on mediation. It also draws a list of common obstacles for business and states preventing the use of mediation in the investor–State context. Finally, this article attempts to map future work which could be useful in the context of UNCITRAL negotiations towards the reform of ISDS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Dispute Settlement\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Dispute Settlement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idac015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idac015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

调解作为投资者与国家争端解决(ISDS)和预防冲突的一个可能有前途的场所,是一个被热烈讨论的话题。鉴于调解可以在国际投资协定的“冷静期”(友好解决)期间使用,本文对这些调解以及在新的国际投资协定中正在增加的明确调解规则进行了总结。从目前已知的为数不多的诉诸调解的案例中吸取教训,提出商业调解的观点。报告还列出了企业和国家在投资者与国家之间使用调解的常见障碍。最后,本文试图对今后在贸易法委员会就改革ISDS进行谈判的背景下可能有用的工作作出规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mediation in Future Investor–State Dispute Settlement
Mediation is an intensely discussed topic as a possibly promising venue for investor–State dispute settlement (ISDS) and conflict prevention. Given that mediation can be used within ‘cooling-off’ (amicable settlement) periods in International Investment Agreements, this article takes stock of those as well as explicit mediation rules which are on the rise in new IIAs. It draws lessons from the small amount of known cases which went to mediation and presents business view on mediation. It also draws a list of common obstacles for business and states preventing the use of mediation in the investor–State context. Finally, this article attempts to map future work which could be useful in the context of UNCITRAL negotiations towards the reform of ISDS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the ‘author’ of international law — The ‘legal effect’ of ICJ’s advisory opinions Continental shelf delimitation beyond 200 nautical miles: Mauritius/Maldives and the forking paths in the jurisprudence The legitimation of international adjudication Reflecting on the rule of law contestations narratives in the world trading system When the Dragon comes Home to Roost: Chinese Investments in the EU, National Security, and Investor–State Arbitration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1