Conspecific Carcass Removal from a Wind Project Study Plot by a Great Horned Owl (Bubo virginianus)

Assessing impacts of wind farms on volant animals requires conducting fatality monitoring studies that incorporate integrated carcass detection trials to account for searcher detection probability and carcass persistence and to reduce biases in the estimated number of fatalities (Smallwood et al. 2018). These trials involve placing a wide range of volant animal carcasses that mimic the expected species composition and actual spatial and temporal patterns of fatalities deposited by the wind turbines and measuring rates of carcass detection (Smallwood et al. 2018). When combined with remote cameras, carcass placement trials can reveal the suite of local scavengers that affect carcass persistence. We report here on an incident of conspecific carcass removal by a Great Horned Owl (Bubo virginianus) documented during a study designed to assess scavenger removal rates of avian carcasses at a wind energy project (Smallwood et al. 2009, 2010). We conducted the scavenger removal study from 12 December 2006 to 28 September 2007 on a 250ha parcel of land administered by the East Bay Regional Park District in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California, USA. The study area contained 52 functional wind turbines situated in rows along ridgelines within a landscape dominated by annual grasses. Sixty-three avian carcasses representing diverse avian species and body sizes, including two Great Horned Owls, were used for this study. Carcasses were obtained fresh-dead as either road kills or from animal rehabilitation hospitals and were kept frozen until used. To avoid scavenger swamping, from one to five carcasses were placed each week at randomly chosen locations within 60-m radii of wind turbine bases throughout the facility. Infrared, motion-activated cameras (Reconyxt, Holmen, WI, USA) were attached to metal posts approximately 1 m above the ground and 1.5 m away from each carcass. When activated, the cameras were set to take five pictures in rapid succession, with a recovery phase of approximately 1 sec between firings. All scavenging trial locations were monitored with cameras for 21 d after carcass placement or until a carcass was removed by scavengers, whichever came first. In some instances, camera removals were delayed beyond 21 d due to field conditions. After cameras were removed, all trial locations with either partial carcasses or feathers continued to be monitored weekly by biologists until the end of the study. For more details on this study, see Smallwood et al. (2009). A Great Horned Owl carcass was placed on 19 December 2006 at 1500 H in front of a remote camera set-up. On 13 January 2007, at 1843 H, a Great Horned Owl was photographed landing on