评价软牙套治疗特发性脊柱侧凸的有效性:文献综述

M. Karimi, M. Kavyani
{"title":"评价软牙套治疗特发性脊柱侧凸的有效性:文献综述","authors":"M. Karimi, M. Kavyani","doi":"10.1177/22104917231191800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Various treatment approaches are used for subjects with idiopathic scoliosis, however using a brace is one of the most common approaches in this regard. The braces used for idiopathic scoliosis can be divided into soft and rigid braces. SpineCor brace is mostly recommended for subjects who refused to use rigid braces. However, it is not well understood whether soft braces are as effective as rigid braces to control scoliosis curve progression or not. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of soft braces used for idiopathic scoliotic curves compared to other available braces. Method: A search was done in databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, ISI Web of Knowledge, Ebsco, Embasco, and Scopus. Keywords of the soft brace, SpineCor were used in combination with scoliosis. The quality of the selected studies was evaluated by use of the Down and Black tool, which is a reliable method to evaluate the quality of the studies. Results: Based on the aforementioned keywords, 52 studies were achieved. After reviewing the title and abstract of each study 11 papers were selected for final analysis. Eight studies were on the evaluation of the effectiveness of the SpineCor brace on scoliosis. There were three studies on the comparison of the SpineCor with other available rigid braces. Conclusion: The results of selected studies confirmed that the SpineCor brace can be used to control the progression of idiopathic scoliosis. However, its effectiveness is limited to the curves with a severity of fewer than 30° and for the patients with Risser signs 0–3. The effectiveness of SpineCor is not comparable with a rigid brace, especially for the curve above 40°. SpineCor stabilizes the spine with high compliance and with significant improvement in posture, rib hump, lumbar predominance, and muscle contraction.","PeriodicalId":42408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the effectiveness of soft braces on idiopathic scoliosis: A review of literature\",\"authors\":\"M. Karimi, M. Kavyani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22104917231191800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Various treatment approaches are used for subjects with idiopathic scoliosis, however using a brace is one of the most common approaches in this regard. The braces used for idiopathic scoliosis can be divided into soft and rigid braces. SpineCor brace is mostly recommended for subjects who refused to use rigid braces. However, it is not well understood whether soft braces are as effective as rigid braces to control scoliosis curve progression or not. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of soft braces used for idiopathic scoliotic curves compared to other available braces. Method: A search was done in databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, ISI Web of Knowledge, Ebsco, Embasco, and Scopus. Keywords of the soft brace, SpineCor were used in combination with scoliosis. The quality of the selected studies was evaluated by use of the Down and Black tool, which is a reliable method to evaluate the quality of the studies. Results: Based on the aforementioned keywords, 52 studies were achieved. After reviewing the title and abstract of each study 11 papers were selected for final analysis. Eight studies were on the evaluation of the effectiveness of the SpineCor brace on scoliosis. There were three studies on the comparison of the SpineCor with other available rigid braces. Conclusion: The results of selected studies confirmed that the SpineCor brace can be used to control the progression of idiopathic scoliosis. However, its effectiveness is limited to the curves with a severity of fewer than 30° and for the patients with Risser signs 0–3. The effectiveness of SpineCor is not comparable with a rigid brace, especially for the curve above 40°. SpineCor stabilizes the spine with high compliance and with significant improvement in posture, rib hump, lumbar predominance, and muscle contraction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231191800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231191800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:特发性脊柱侧凸的治疗方法多种多样,但支架是最常用的治疗方法之一。用于特发性脊柱侧凸的牙套可分为软牙套和硬牙套。SpineCor支具主要推荐给拒绝使用刚性支具的受试者。然而,软牙套是否与硬牙套一样有效地控制脊柱侧凸曲线进展尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在评估软牙套与其他可用牙套相比用于特发性脊柱侧凸弯曲的有效性。方法:检索PubMed、Google Scholar、ISI Web of Knowledge、Ebsco、embassy、Scopus等数据库。关键词:软支具;脊柱侧凸;脊柱侧凸;所选研究的质量通过使用Down和Black工具进行评估,这是评估研究质量的可靠方法。结果:基于上述关键词共获得52项研究。在审阅了每一篇研究的题目和摘要后,我们选择了11篇论文进行最终分析。8项研究评估了脊柱侧凸的脊柱支撑的有效性。SpineCor与其他刚性支具的比较研究有三篇。结论:选定的研究结果证实SpineCor支具可用于控制特发性脊柱侧凸的进展。然而,其有效性仅限于严重程度小于30°的弯曲和Risser体征0-3的患者。SpineCor的有效性无法与刚性支撑相比,特别是对于40°以上的弯曲。SpineCor稳定脊柱,具有高度顺应性,并显著改善姿势、肋骨隆起、腰椎优势和肌肉收缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the effectiveness of soft braces on idiopathic scoliosis: A review of literature
Background: Various treatment approaches are used for subjects with idiopathic scoliosis, however using a brace is one of the most common approaches in this regard. The braces used for idiopathic scoliosis can be divided into soft and rigid braces. SpineCor brace is mostly recommended for subjects who refused to use rigid braces. However, it is not well understood whether soft braces are as effective as rigid braces to control scoliosis curve progression or not. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of soft braces used for idiopathic scoliotic curves compared to other available braces. Method: A search was done in databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, ISI Web of Knowledge, Ebsco, Embasco, and Scopus. Keywords of the soft brace, SpineCor were used in combination with scoliosis. The quality of the selected studies was evaluated by use of the Down and Black tool, which is a reliable method to evaluate the quality of the studies. Results: Based on the aforementioned keywords, 52 studies were achieved. After reviewing the title and abstract of each study 11 papers were selected for final analysis. Eight studies were on the evaluation of the effectiveness of the SpineCor brace on scoliosis. There were three studies on the comparison of the SpineCor with other available rigid braces. Conclusion: The results of selected studies confirmed that the SpineCor brace can be used to control the progression of idiopathic scoliosis. However, its effectiveness is limited to the curves with a severity of fewer than 30° and for the patients with Risser signs 0–3. The effectiveness of SpineCor is not comparable with a rigid brace, especially for the curve above 40°. SpineCor stabilizes the spine with high compliance and with significant improvement in posture, rib hump, lumbar predominance, and muscle contraction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasonic measurement for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: A study in the Hong Kong Chinese population The surgical outcome of postoperative radial neck nonunion: Retrospective case series with systematic review Tip-to-apex distance does not predict fixation failure regardless of reduction quality in intra-capsular neck of femur fractures treated with femoral neck system Real world patient-reported and health care professional-perceived pain severity in outpatient fracture clinic procedures Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sports and arthroscopic surgery in local hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1