内窥镜和内窥镜辅助的腹壁疝的微型或较少开放的下网状修补术(EMILOS和MILOS):更新和单一机构的10年经验

W. Reinpold, C. Berger, R. Bittner
{"title":"内窥镜和内窥镜辅助的腹壁疝的微型或较少开放的下网状修补术(EMILOS和MILOS):更新和单一机构的10年经验","authors":"W. Reinpold, C. Berger, R. Bittner","doi":"10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_61_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Abdominal wall hernia and incisional hernia repair are among the most frequent operations in general surgery. However, despite the use of mesh and other recent improvements, the open mesh techniques and laparoscopic IPOM repair have specific disadvantages and risks. Materials and Methods: To minimize complications of the existing open and laparoscopic techniques we developed the endoscopic Mini- or Less Open Sublay (EMILOS) and endoscopically assisted Mini- or Less Open Sublay (MILOS) concept. We report on our large series of minimally invasive sublay repair of and ventral incisional hernias. The operation is performed transhernially with light-holding laparoscopic instruments either under direct, or endoscopic visualization, while the abdominal wall is circumferentially elevated with retractors. An endoscopic light tube was developed to facilitate this approach (Endotorch,TM Wolf Company). Each MILOS operation can be converted to standard total extraperitoneal gas endoscopy (EMILOS repair) once an extraperitoneal space of at least 8 cm has been created. The technique allows minimal invasive repair of ventral hernias with concomitant rectus diastasis. In large eventrations E/MILOS m. transversus abdominis release (TAR) can be performed. All MILOS operations were prospectively documented in the German Hernia registry Herniamed. Technical modifications and improvements from the inception of the E/MILOS concept including variants of the EMILOS technique are addressed. Results: The total and surgical complication rates of 1745 E/MILOS incisional hernia operations were 4.6% and 3.1%, respectively. The reoperation rate was 1.7%. Haemorrhage, seroma, enterotomy, infection and bowel obstruction were detected in 1.0, 0.9, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 percent of the cases, respectively. The recurrence rate after one year was 1.2%. Chronic pain at rest, at activities and chronic pain requiring therapy was reported in 3.8, 7.4 and 3.6 percent, respectively. Conclusion: The MILOS technique allows minimally invasive transhernial repair of incisional hernias using large retromuscular / preperitoneal meshes with low morbidity. The technique is reproducible, cost effective, easy to standardize and combines the advantages of open sublay and the laparoscopic IPOM repair.","PeriodicalId":34200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","volume":"45 1","pages":"165 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic and endoscopically assisted mini or less open sublay mesh repair (EMILOS and MILOS) of abdominal wall hernias: Update and 10-year experience of a single insitution\",\"authors\":\"W. Reinpold, C. Berger, R. Bittner\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_61_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Abdominal wall hernia and incisional hernia repair are among the most frequent operations in general surgery. However, despite the use of mesh and other recent improvements, the open mesh techniques and laparoscopic IPOM repair have specific disadvantages and risks. Materials and Methods: To minimize complications of the existing open and laparoscopic techniques we developed the endoscopic Mini- or Less Open Sublay (EMILOS) and endoscopically assisted Mini- or Less Open Sublay (MILOS) concept. We report on our large series of minimally invasive sublay repair of and ventral incisional hernias. The operation is performed transhernially with light-holding laparoscopic instruments either under direct, or endoscopic visualization, while the abdominal wall is circumferentially elevated with retractors. An endoscopic light tube was developed to facilitate this approach (Endotorch,TM Wolf Company). Each MILOS operation can be converted to standard total extraperitoneal gas endoscopy (EMILOS repair) once an extraperitoneal space of at least 8 cm has been created. The technique allows minimal invasive repair of ventral hernias with concomitant rectus diastasis. In large eventrations E/MILOS m. transversus abdominis release (TAR) can be performed. All MILOS operations were prospectively documented in the German Hernia registry Herniamed. Technical modifications and improvements from the inception of the E/MILOS concept including variants of the EMILOS technique are addressed. Results: The total and surgical complication rates of 1745 E/MILOS incisional hernia operations were 4.6% and 3.1%, respectively. The reoperation rate was 1.7%. Haemorrhage, seroma, enterotomy, infection and bowel obstruction were detected in 1.0, 0.9, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 percent of the cases, respectively. The recurrence rate after one year was 1.2%. Chronic pain at rest, at activities and chronic pain requiring therapy was reported in 3.8, 7.4 and 3.6 percent, respectively. Conclusion: The MILOS technique allows minimally invasive transhernial repair of incisional hernias using large retromuscular / preperitoneal meshes with low morbidity. The technique is reproducible, cost effective, easy to standardize and combines the advantages of open sublay and the laparoscopic IPOM repair.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"165 - 178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_61_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_61_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

腹壁疝和切口疝修补术是普通外科中最常见的手术。然而,尽管使用了补片和其他最近的改进,开放式补片技术和腹腔镜IPOM修复有特定的缺点和风险。材料和方法:为了最大限度地减少现有的开放和腹腔镜技术的并发症,我们开发了内镜下的迷你或更少开放的subblay (EMILOS)和内镜辅助的迷你或更少开放的subblay (MILOS)概念。我们报告了我们大量的微创下疝修补术和腹侧切口疝。手术是在直接或内窥镜观察下,通过光线保持的腹腔镜器械进行的,同时用牵开器将腹壁沿周抬高。开发了一种内窥镜光管来促进这种方法(Endotorch,TM Wolf公司)。每次MILOS手术可以转换为标准的全腹膜外气体内窥镜(EMILOS修复),一旦腹腔外空间至少创造8cm。该技术允许微创修复腹疝合并直肌转移。在大的手术中,可以进行E/MILOS m.腹侧松解(TAR)。所有MILOS手术都在德国疝登记中心进行前瞻性记录。从E/MILOS概念开始的技术修改和改进,包括EMILOS技术的变体。结果:1745例E/MILOS切口疝手术总发生率为4.6%,手术并发症发生率为3.1%。再手术率为1.7%。出血、血肿、肠切开、感染和肠梗阻的发生率分别为1.0、0.9、0.2、0.3和0.4%。1年后复发率为1.2%。休息时的慢性疼痛、活动时的慢性疼痛和需要治疗的慢性疼痛分别占3.8%、7.4%和3.6%。结论:MILOS技术允许使用大的肌肉后/腹膜前补片进行切口疝的微创经疝修补,且发病率低。该技术具有可重复性好、成本低、易于标准化等特点,并结合了腹腔镜IPOM修复和开放式下腔修复的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic and endoscopically assisted mini or less open sublay mesh repair (EMILOS and MILOS) of abdominal wall hernias: Update and 10-year experience of a single insitution
Introduction: Abdominal wall hernia and incisional hernia repair are among the most frequent operations in general surgery. However, despite the use of mesh and other recent improvements, the open mesh techniques and laparoscopic IPOM repair have specific disadvantages and risks. Materials and Methods: To minimize complications of the existing open and laparoscopic techniques we developed the endoscopic Mini- or Less Open Sublay (EMILOS) and endoscopically assisted Mini- or Less Open Sublay (MILOS) concept. We report on our large series of minimally invasive sublay repair of and ventral incisional hernias. The operation is performed transhernially with light-holding laparoscopic instruments either under direct, or endoscopic visualization, while the abdominal wall is circumferentially elevated with retractors. An endoscopic light tube was developed to facilitate this approach (Endotorch,TM Wolf Company). Each MILOS operation can be converted to standard total extraperitoneal gas endoscopy (EMILOS repair) once an extraperitoneal space of at least 8 cm has been created. The technique allows minimal invasive repair of ventral hernias with concomitant rectus diastasis. In large eventrations E/MILOS m. transversus abdominis release (TAR) can be performed. All MILOS operations were prospectively documented in the German Hernia registry Herniamed. Technical modifications and improvements from the inception of the E/MILOS concept including variants of the EMILOS technique are addressed. Results: The total and surgical complication rates of 1745 E/MILOS incisional hernia operations were 4.6% and 3.1%, respectively. The reoperation rate was 1.7%. Haemorrhage, seroma, enterotomy, infection and bowel obstruction were detected in 1.0, 0.9, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 percent of the cases, respectively. The recurrence rate after one year was 1.2%. Chronic pain at rest, at activities and chronic pain requiring therapy was reported in 3.8, 7.4 and 3.6 percent, respectively. Conclusion: The MILOS technique allows minimally invasive transhernial repair of incisional hernias using large retromuscular / preperitoneal meshes with low morbidity. The technique is reproducible, cost effective, easy to standardize and combines the advantages of open sublay and the laparoscopic IPOM repair.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Importance of Shared Decision Making in the Decision to Prevent a Parastomal Hernia With Prosthetic Mesh Hernia Basecamp—A Free to Use, Online Hernia Learning Platform. Analysis of Its Use Since Launch in June 2021 Female Groin Hernia Repairs in the Swedish Hernia Register 1992–2022: A Review With Updates Long-Term Outcomes After Epigastric Hernia Repair in Women—A Nationwide Database Study EHS Rapid Guideline: Evidence-Informed European Recommendations on Parastomal Hernia Prevention—With ESCP and EAES Participation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1