经腹平面阻滞或腰方肌阻滞用于全腹子宫切除术后镇痛的回顾性研究

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care Pub Date : 2021-11-25 DOI:10.25284/2519-2078.4(97).2021.248399
A. Ryzhkovskyi, O. Filyk, R. Trokhymovych
{"title":"经腹平面阻滞或腰方肌阻滞用于全腹子宫切除术后镇痛的回顾性研究","authors":"A. Ryzhkovskyi, O. Filyk, R. Trokhymovych","doi":"10.25284/2519-2078.4(97).2021.248399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Techniques of myofascial blockades are widely used after gynecological surgeries. The aim of study was to compare TAP block and QL block for postoperative analgesia of total abdominal hysterectomies.\nMaterials and methods. We provided the retrospective single-center cohort study and included 51 patients 40-65 years old with complicated symptomatic uterus fibroids, who need total abdominal hysterectomy. Both groups underwent general anesthesia. In addition, in I group it was performed TAP block bilaterally via lateral access; in II group – QL block bilaterally via anterior (transmuscular) access. After surgery both groups` patients received multimodal analgesia with dexketoprofen, paracetamol, nefopam; in case of severe pain - nalbuphine. The stages of the study were 6 hours (h6), 12 hours (h12), 24 hours (h24), 48 hours (h48), 72 hours (h72) after surgery. We made the analysis pain level (with visual analogue scale - VAS), heart rate, mean arterial pressure, daily requirement of nalbuphine, duration of hospitalization.\nResults and discussion. It was found that the level of pain according to VAS in I group reached its maximum values on the stages h6 and h12 and was 4.8 [3,3; 5.8] points and 5.0 [3.9; 6.4] points, while in II group - 2.5 [2,3; 3.5] points and 2.1 [1.6; 4.1] points, respectively (p <0.05). We found significant differences in heart rate between groups on h12 stage when it was 86 [82; 90] beats / min in I group, and 72 [63; 79] beats / min in II group (p = 0.05). The daily requirement of nalbuphine on h12 stage had the tendency (p = 0.07) to be lower in II group (20.9 ± 1.1 mg / day), compared with the I group I (31.4 ± 2.9 mg / day). The need for nalbuphine use on h24 stage was significantly lower (p <0.05) in II group (5.8 ± 0.8 mg / day), compared with I group (22.5 ± 4.1 mg / day). The duration of hospitalization in I group was 7.8 ± 0.5 days, in II group - 6.2 ± 0.5 days (p>0,05).\nConclusion. The use of QL block, compared with TAP block, showed a pain severity decreasing in 2 times (p <0.05), a tendency to reduce the need for nalbuphine use in 2.5 times (p> 0.05), and a tendency to reduce the duration of hospitalization by 1.6 days (p> 0.05).","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK OR QUADRATUS LUMBORUM BLOCK FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER TOTAL ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMIES: THE RETROSPECTIVE STUDY\",\"authors\":\"A. Ryzhkovskyi, O. Filyk, R. Trokhymovych\",\"doi\":\"10.25284/2519-2078.4(97).2021.248399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Techniques of myofascial blockades are widely used after gynecological surgeries. The aim of study was to compare TAP block and QL block for postoperative analgesia of total abdominal hysterectomies.\\nMaterials and methods. We provided the retrospective single-center cohort study and included 51 patients 40-65 years old with complicated symptomatic uterus fibroids, who need total abdominal hysterectomy. Both groups underwent general anesthesia. In addition, in I group it was performed TAP block bilaterally via lateral access; in II group – QL block bilaterally via anterior (transmuscular) access. After surgery both groups` patients received multimodal analgesia with dexketoprofen, paracetamol, nefopam; in case of severe pain - nalbuphine. The stages of the study were 6 hours (h6), 12 hours (h12), 24 hours (h24), 48 hours (h48), 72 hours (h72) after surgery. We made the analysis pain level (with visual analogue scale - VAS), heart rate, mean arterial pressure, daily requirement of nalbuphine, duration of hospitalization.\\nResults and discussion. It was found that the level of pain according to VAS in I group reached its maximum values on the stages h6 and h12 and was 4.8 [3,3; 5.8] points and 5.0 [3.9; 6.4] points, while in II group - 2.5 [2,3; 3.5] points and 2.1 [1.6; 4.1] points, respectively (p <0.05). We found significant differences in heart rate between groups on h12 stage when it was 86 [82; 90] beats / min in I group, and 72 [63; 79] beats / min in II group (p = 0.05). The daily requirement of nalbuphine on h12 stage had the tendency (p = 0.07) to be lower in II group (20.9 ± 1.1 mg / day), compared with the I group I (31.4 ± 2.9 mg / day). The need for nalbuphine use on h24 stage was significantly lower (p <0.05) in II group (5.8 ± 0.8 mg / day), compared with I group (22.5 ± 4.1 mg / day). The duration of hospitalization in I group was 7.8 ± 0.5 days, in II group - 6.2 ± 0.5 days (p>0,05).\\nConclusion. The use of QL block, compared with TAP block, showed a pain severity decreasing in 2 times (p <0.05), a tendency to reduce the need for nalbuphine use in 2.5 times (p> 0.05), and a tendency to reduce the duration of hospitalization by 1.6 days (p> 0.05).\",\"PeriodicalId\":7735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.4(97).2021.248399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.4(97).2021.248399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。肌筋膜阻滞技术在妇科手术后被广泛应用。本研究的目的是比较TAP阻滞和QL阻滞在腹部全子宫切除术后的镇痛效果。材料和方法。我们提供了一项回顾性的单中心队列研究,纳入了51例40-65岁的复杂症状性子宫肌瘤患者,他们需要全腹子宫切除术。两组均行全身麻醉。此外,在I组中,通过侧通路进行双侧TAP阻滞;II组- QL通过前路(经肌肉)通道阻断双侧。术后两组患者均采用右酮洛芬、扑热息痛、尼福泮多模式镇痛;如果剧烈疼痛,用纳布芬。研究分期为术后6小时(h6)、12小时(h12)、24小时(h24)、48小时(h48)、72小时(h72)。对疼痛程度(视觉模拟评分- VAS)、心率、平均动脉压、纳布啡日需用量、住院时间进行分析。结果和讨论。结果发现,I组疼痛评分在h6、h12期达到最高值,为4.8 [3,3];5.8分,5.0分,3.9分;6.4分,II组- 2.5分[2,3];3.5分,2.1分,1.6分;4.1分,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。使用QL阻滞与TAP阻滞相比,疼痛严重程度降低2倍(p 0.05),住院时间有缩短1.6天的趋势(p> 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK OR QUADRATUS LUMBORUM BLOCK FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER TOTAL ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMIES: THE RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
Background. Techniques of myofascial blockades are widely used after gynecological surgeries. The aim of study was to compare TAP block and QL block for postoperative analgesia of total abdominal hysterectomies. Materials and methods. We provided the retrospective single-center cohort study and included 51 patients 40-65 years old with complicated symptomatic uterus fibroids, who need total abdominal hysterectomy. Both groups underwent general anesthesia. In addition, in I group it was performed TAP block bilaterally via lateral access; in II group – QL block bilaterally via anterior (transmuscular) access. After surgery both groups` patients received multimodal analgesia with dexketoprofen, paracetamol, nefopam; in case of severe pain - nalbuphine. The stages of the study were 6 hours (h6), 12 hours (h12), 24 hours (h24), 48 hours (h48), 72 hours (h72) after surgery. We made the analysis pain level (with visual analogue scale - VAS), heart rate, mean arterial pressure, daily requirement of nalbuphine, duration of hospitalization. Results and discussion. It was found that the level of pain according to VAS in I group reached its maximum values on the stages h6 and h12 and was 4.8 [3,3; 5.8] points and 5.0 [3.9; 6.4] points, while in II group - 2.5 [2,3; 3.5] points and 2.1 [1.6; 4.1] points, respectively (p <0.05). We found significant differences in heart rate between groups on h12 stage when it was 86 [82; 90] beats / min in I group, and 72 [63; 79] beats / min in II group (p = 0.05). The daily requirement of nalbuphine on h12 stage had the tendency (p = 0.07) to be lower in II group (20.9 ± 1.1 mg / day), compared with the I group I (31.4 ± 2.9 mg / day). The need for nalbuphine use on h24 stage was significantly lower (p <0.05) in II group (5.8 ± 0.8 mg / day), compared with I group (22.5 ± 4.1 mg / day). The duration of hospitalization in I group was 7.8 ± 0.5 days, in II group - 6.2 ± 0.5 days (p>0,05). Conclusion. The use of QL block, compared with TAP block, showed a pain severity decreasing in 2 times (p <0.05), a tendency to reduce the need for nalbuphine use in 2.5 times (p> 0.05), and a tendency to reduce the duration of hospitalization by 1.6 days (p> 0.05).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
NSAIDs in COVID-19, friend or foe? Post cervical spine surgery hyperpyrexia (108?F) in a patient with COVID-19: a case report Extreme physical exhaustion leading to hypokalemic periodic paralysis- a case report Difficult airway management in Apert syndrome for maxillofacial reconstruction: a case report Anesthesia without opioids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1