{"title":"在伦敦-法国跨国空间中航行:语言作为具体化和嵌入符号资本的得失","authors":"S. Huc-Hepher","doi":"10.3390/LANGUAGES6010057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, an interdisciplinary lens is applied to French migrants’ reflections on their everyday language practices, investigating how embodied and embedded language, such as accent and London-French translanguaging, serve as both in-group and out-group symbolic markers in different transnational spaces. Key sociological concepts developed by Pierre Bourdieu are deployed, including field, habitus, hysteresis and symbolic capital, to assess the varying symbolic conversion rates of the migrants’ languaging practices across transnational spaces. A mixed-methodological and analytical approach is taken, combining narratives from ethnographic interviews and autobiography. Based on the data gathered, the article posits that the French accent is an embodied symbolic marker, experienced as an internalised dialectic: a barrier to inclusion/belonging in London and an escape from the symbolic weight of the originary accent in France. Subsequently, it argues that the migrants’ translanguaging functions as a spontaneous insider vernacular conducive to community identity construction in the postmigration space, but (mis)interpreted as an exclusionary articulation of symbolic distinction in the premigration context. Finally, the article asks whether participants’ linguistic repertoires, self-identifications and spatialities go beyond the notion of the ‘cleft habitus’, or even hybridity, to a post-structural, translanguaging third space that transcends borders.","PeriodicalId":45337,"journal":{"name":"Langages","volume":"59 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the London-French Transnational Space: The Losses and Gains of Language as Embodied and Embedded Symbolic Capital\",\"authors\":\"S. Huc-Hepher\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/LANGUAGES6010057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, an interdisciplinary lens is applied to French migrants’ reflections on their everyday language practices, investigating how embodied and embedded language, such as accent and London-French translanguaging, serve as both in-group and out-group symbolic markers in different transnational spaces. Key sociological concepts developed by Pierre Bourdieu are deployed, including field, habitus, hysteresis and symbolic capital, to assess the varying symbolic conversion rates of the migrants’ languaging practices across transnational spaces. A mixed-methodological and analytical approach is taken, combining narratives from ethnographic interviews and autobiography. Based on the data gathered, the article posits that the French accent is an embodied symbolic marker, experienced as an internalised dialectic: a barrier to inclusion/belonging in London and an escape from the symbolic weight of the originary accent in France. Subsequently, it argues that the migrants’ translanguaging functions as a spontaneous insider vernacular conducive to community identity construction in the postmigration space, but (mis)interpreted as an exclusionary articulation of symbolic distinction in the premigration context. Finally, the article asks whether participants’ linguistic repertoires, self-identifications and spatialities go beyond the notion of the ‘cleft habitus’, or even hybridity, to a post-structural, translanguaging third space that transcends borders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langages\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langages\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/LANGUAGES6010057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langages","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/LANGUAGES6010057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Navigating the London-French Transnational Space: The Losses and Gains of Language as Embodied and Embedded Symbolic Capital
In this article, an interdisciplinary lens is applied to French migrants’ reflections on their everyday language practices, investigating how embodied and embedded language, such as accent and London-French translanguaging, serve as both in-group and out-group symbolic markers in different transnational spaces. Key sociological concepts developed by Pierre Bourdieu are deployed, including field, habitus, hysteresis and symbolic capital, to assess the varying symbolic conversion rates of the migrants’ languaging practices across transnational spaces. A mixed-methodological and analytical approach is taken, combining narratives from ethnographic interviews and autobiography. Based on the data gathered, the article posits that the French accent is an embodied symbolic marker, experienced as an internalised dialectic: a barrier to inclusion/belonging in London and an escape from the symbolic weight of the originary accent in France. Subsequently, it argues that the migrants’ translanguaging functions as a spontaneous insider vernacular conducive to community identity construction in the postmigration space, but (mis)interpreted as an exclusionary articulation of symbolic distinction in the premigration context. Finally, the article asks whether participants’ linguistic repertoires, self-identifications and spatialities go beyond the notion of the ‘cleft habitus’, or even hybridity, to a post-structural, translanguaging third space that transcends borders.
期刊介绍:
Créée en 1966 par R. Barthes, J. Dubois, A.-J. Greimas, B. Pottier, B. Quemada, N. Ruwet, la revue Langages a été dirigée scientifiquement par D. Leeman jusqu’en 2009. Langages met à la disposition d’une communauté scientifique pluridisciplinaire, sans exclusive théorique ou méthodologique, les résultats des recherches contemporaines de pointe, originales, nationales et internationales, menées dans l’ensemble des domaines couverts par les sciences du langage entendues au sens le plus large du terme, y compris dans leurs interfaces avec leurs disciplines connexes (psycholinguistique, traitement automatique du langage, didactique, traduction…). Langages accueille toutes les thématiques reflétant les préoccupations qui dominent selon les époques ou les mutations disciplinaires, ainsi que les bilans de champs linguistiques particuliers assortis de visée prospective. Langages édite chaque année 4 volumes, chacun sous la responsabilité scientifique d’un coordinateur qui sollicite les contributeurs, français ou étrangers, experts du thème traité. Les volumes proposés sont soumis à une double expertise : les propositions de numéros sont agréées par un comité scientifique international multi-disciplinaire ; les volumes dans leur état final sont expertisés par des spécialistes de la thématique abordée français et étrangers, extérieurs au comité.