神学院与学生发展的多案例探讨:神学教育中的属灵形成

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Christian Education Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1177/07398913231177722
David C. Wang, Angela H. Reed, Stephen P. Greggo, L. Bowersox, Amy Drennan, Brad D. Strawn, P. E. King, Steven L. Porter, Peter C. Hill
{"title":"神学院与学生发展的多案例探讨:神学教育中的属灵形成","authors":"David C. Wang, Angela H. Reed, Stephen P. Greggo, L. Bowersox, Amy Drennan, Brad D. Strawn, P. E. King, Steven L. Porter, Peter C. Hill","doi":"10.1177/07398913231177722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, theological schools have demonstrated increased interest in educational models that not only transmit knowledge and skill to students, but also prepare them to have the character and virtue dispositions needed to successfully navigate the moral challenges that await them in future ministry settings. This shift is reflected in the most recent 2020 accreditation standards of the Association of Theological Schools (ATS), which highlight the importance of “personal and spiritual formation” as a key facet to seminary programs. Research conducted by the ATS (2018) into how seminaries understood the terms “personal and spiritual formation” revealed that over 40% of seminaries do not have a formal or working institutional definition of personal and spiritual formation. While this finding may be understandable given the complexities of terms and definitions in light of diverse Christian spiritual traditions, it also highlights an area of crucial need given the centrality of spiritual formation to the mission of theological education. Accordingly, the aim of this present paper is to support work in this area and to stimulate a larger discussion into the topic of spiritual formation within the seminary context by articulating and putting forth four different institutional perspectives on the topic (from Fuller Theological Seminary, George Truett Theological Seminary, Talbot School of Theology, and Trinity Evangelical Divinity School).","PeriodicalId":37144,"journal":{"name":"Christian Education Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"65 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spiritual Formation in Theological Education: A Multi-case Exploration on Seminaries and Student Development\",\"authors\":\"David C. Wang, Angela H. Reed, Stephen P. Greggo, L. Bowersox, Amy Drennan, Brad D. Strawn, P. E. King, Steven L. Porter, Peter C. Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07398913231177722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent decades, theological schools have demonstrated increased interest in educational models that not only transmit knowledge and skill to students, but also prepare them to have the character and virtue dispositions needed to successfully navigate the moral challenges that await them in future ministry settings. This shift is reflected in the most recent 2020 accreditation standards of the Association of Theological Schools (ATS), which highlight the importance of “personal and spiritual formation” as a key facet to seminary programs. Research conducted by the ATS (2018) into how seminaries understood the terms “personal and spiritual formation” revealed that over 40% of seminaries do not have a formal or working institutional definition of personal and spiritual formation. While this finding may be understandable given the complexities of terms and definitions in light of diverse Christian spiritual traditions, it also highlights an area of crucial need given the centrality of spiritual formation to the mission of theological education. Accordingly, the aim of this present paper is to support work in this area and to stimulate a larger discussion into the topic of spiritual formation within the seminary context by articulating and putting forth four different institutional perspectives on the topic (from Fuller Theological Seminary, George Truett Theological Seminary, Talbot School of Theology, and Trinity Evangelical Divinity School).\",\"PeriodicalId\":37144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Christian Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"65 - 86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Christian Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07398913231177722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07398913231177722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近几十年来,神学院对教育模式表现出越来越大的兴趣,这种教育模式不仅要向学生传授知识和技能,而且要培养他们的品格和美德,以成功地应对未来事工环境中等待他们的道德挑战。这一转变反映在神学院协会(ATS)最新的2020年认证标准中,该标准强调了“个人和精神形成”作为神学院课程关键方面的重要性。ATS(2018)对神学院如何理解“个人和精神形成”这一术语进行的研究显示,超过40%的神学院没有对个人和精神形成的正式或有效的制度定义。鉴于不同基督教精神传统的术语和定义的复杂性,这一发现可能是可以理解的,但它也强调了一个至关重要的需要领域,因为精神形成对神学教育的使命至关重要。因此,本文的目的是支持这一领域的工作,并通过阐述和提出四种不同的机构观点(来自富勒神学院、乔治·特鲁特神学院、塔尔博特神学院和三一福音神学院),激发对神学院背景下的属灵形成主题的更广泛讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spiritual Formation in Theological Education: A Multi-case Exploration on Seminaries and Student Development
In recent decades, theological schools have demonstrated increased interest in educational models that not only transmit knowledge and skill to students, but also prepare them to have the character and virtue dispositions needed to successfully navigate the moral challenges that await them in future ministry settings. This shift is reflected in the most recent 2020 accreditation standards of the Association of Theological Schools (ATS), which highlight the importance of “personal and spiritual formation” as a key facet to seminary programs. Research conducted by the ATS (2018) into how seminaries understood the terms “personal and spiritual formation” revealed that over 40% of seminaries do not have a formal or working institutional definition of personal and spiritual formation. While this finding may be understandable given the complexities of terms and definitions in light of diverse Christian spiritual traditions, it also highlights an area of crucial need given the centrality of spiritual formation to the mission of theological education. Accordingly, the aim of this present paper is to support work in this area and to stimulate a larger discussion into the topic of spiritual formation within the seminary context by articulating and putting forth four different institutional perspectives on the topic (from Fuller Theological Seminary, George Truett Theological Seminary, Talbot School of Theology, and Trinity Evangelical Divinity School).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Christian Education Journal
Christian Education Journal Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
66.70%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Kinematic and Kinetic Variables After Knee Joint Surgery Before and After 8 Weeks of Individual Training (Case Study) The Impact of Educational Structure on Job Satisfaction of Employees in District and Zone Education Office The Application of Online and Offline Blended Teaching Mode in College English Reading Teaching Dynamic Managerial Capabilities and New Product Development in the Fashion and Apparel Design Industry Research on the Dilemma of "Hard Integration" of Ideological and Political Education in Higher Education Curriculum and Its Digital Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1